It took 6 months for the first review, and major revision was required. There were three reviewers, and reviewers 1 and 2 didn’t raised big questions. Reviewer 3 raised more than ten questions. After replying seriously, I submitted the revised manuscript. It took 2 months for the second review. The reviewer 3 was satisfied, and agreed to accept it. However, reviewer 4 was added; this is the one I didn’t see in the first review. Fortunately, there were no big problems. Half a month after the submission of the reply, it was accepted.

(3) Thank | 修炼的韭菜

Excuse me, does the status date keep changing during the review of the manuscript? My status date has not changed, and I am really very anxious!

(0) Thank | amao1264

Submitted in April 19, major revision was required in June; There were three reviewers, two gave good comments, one gave negative comments. It was submitted in July after major revision. Then it was required a major revision in August. One reviewer recommended for acceptance, and two felt that it would be better after modification. After the major revision, it was submitted on October, and then a major revision was required on November. The first three reviewers all recommended for acceptance, but the editor invited the fourth reviewer. It was resubmitted in December, and got accepted at the end of December. A minor revision was required to adjust the format. Because it is the first SCI paper, with a relatively poor quality, and underwent many troubles. The editor patiently found someone to review the manuscript, which is of great help to the improvement of the article. The reviewer despised it very fiercely, but always gave me the opportunity to revise. Except for the first time it took 2 months, they would reply within 1 month afterwards.

(13) Thank | 南门的花海

The journal staff is very friendly. The editors will give you very good advice and assistance.

(5) Thank | yinchiyen@gmail.com

Additional information: Submitted on 3.30, reviewed on 4.3, the editor processed it quickly.
Continuation: Proofread on 8.1, peer review online on 8.6.

(0) Thank | 倔强的奥斯特

May I ask how long it takes to submit to invite reviewers?

(0) Thank | JLC

Why haven't I received your response yet?

(0) Thank | 麻辣拌粉

May I ask where you obtained the Ethical statement from? Has it been reviewed yet?

(0) Thank | 辰熙

This time it was pretty fast, record:
3.30 submit
5.15 major revision, three reviewers, three weeks for revisions
6.1 revision submitted
6.3 editor assigned & editor invited
6.20 Required Reviews Completed
6.25 minor revision, one reviewer dropped out, one reviewer accepted, one reviewer had questions, only gave 10 days for revisions
7.1 revision submitted
7.4 under review, had to resubmit, thought it would be accepted directly
7.13 the last reviewer also agreed, didn't expect to be asked to resubmit a clean version, have to write a response again, but should be considered accepted.

(0) Thank | 倔强的奥斯特

Translate the following paragraph into English: I've been rejected for 20 nights now, they said there is currently more research in this area. As for the ethical statement, you can find a template online, or just have DeepSeek write one for you and make some modifications.

(0) Thank | 那就试着读下去

How to write an Ethical statement? I couldn't find a template on the official website, so I wrote one myself with the author's signature. However, the editor still rejected it today, saying there was no Ethical statement.

(0) Thank | 刘明浩

How should an Ethical statement be written?

(0) Thank | 刘明浩

6-20 Editor Assignment Pending

(0) Thank | 那就试着读下去

Record submission for everyone's reference (like someone like me who doesn't have much control, it will definitely be helpful, just pay attention when browsing quickly)
Created on 25-6-14, wrote a cover letter (note: foreign countries attach great importance to this, it is recommended to prepare), and other fillable content (title, funding, etc.)
On 6-16, confirmed the list of authors with the research institute (related to physical production of enterprises, providing quotas to enterprises), and finalized the list with school teachers, requesting teachers to provide OCRID and email (he is the corresponding author, but not very involved, so I can only use his email for handling). Sent cover letter and manuscript through the manuscript interface.
Note: OCRID needs to be linked to the journal submission website, make sure to get the teacher's email, after submitting by yourself, the corresponding author needs to check the merged PDF and then confirm.
On 6-17 noon, it was mentioned that an Ethical statement was missing. Note: It is recommended to write a separate Ethical statement.
On 6-18 noon, it was mentioned that author information was missing. Note: All author information must be complete, all of it!

(2) Thank | 那就试着读下去

I withdrew my submission from the editor-in-chief, it's too slow, I can't stand it.

(0) Thank | Huo Wang

Similarly, no news from EI for a month.

(0) Thank | jackyqu

It's too slow. The editor invited me a long time ago, but there has been no news. What's going on?

(0) Thank | Huo Wang

May I ask how are the results? Is the review speed of the artificial intelligence direction quite fast?

(0) Thank | ccf2025

Open a pit to record, it feels very fast:
10 Apr 2025 Submission
11 Apr 2025 Content modification
12 Apr 2025 Submission to journal
13 Apr 2025 EAP
14 Apr 2025 EI
15 Apr 2025 RC

(0) Thank | WineCool

Have you got any results yet?

(0) Thank | ccf2025

According to people in the group, this journal has a first review in just one month, is that possible? I withdrew my submission after waiting six months for the first review before...

(0) Thank | 菠萝干abc

Which journal did the original poster switch to?

(0) Thank | 影影绰绰

Which journal did you submit to next?

(0) Thank | wyl1115731297

May I ask how much reduction you finally accepted for my last revision, which required a reduction?

(0) Thank | tang

Submitted on 9.30
Rejected on 10.6, reason being a decision was made to no longer conduct a comprehensive review of your manuscript...

Found another journal on 10.6, accepted on 12.13. Published on 12.27.

I wonder if it's because of my school, they just rejected me directly, without giving any reasons...
But the journal clearly has articles in my field, written very poorly, is it just because the address is better?

(0) Thank | 泽泽yuk