Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | Journal of Hydrology | ||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | J HYDROL | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0022-1694 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | 192 | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 14.80% | ||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-hydrology | ||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/HYDROL | ||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||
Publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE | ||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Geoscience | ||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Semimonthly | ||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1963 | ||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 1400 | ||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0022-1694%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 8.3 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 50% | ||||||||||||||||
Online Article Publication Time | Data from Elsevier: Average 6.8 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on Journal of Hydrology: | Write a review |
Author: xzw1995 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-09-13 08:05:44 Submitted: 2019-06-25. Editor assigned: 2019-06-26. Reviewer invited: 2019-06-27. Under Review: 2019-06-28. Reviewer invited: 2019-07-04. Under Review: 2019-08-10. With editor: 2019 -08-21. Moderate Revision: 2019-08-21. Revision resubmitted to journal: 2019-09-11. Editor Assigned: 2019-09-12. Accepted: 2019-09-13. Associate Editor: Jose-Luis Molina. Editor-in-Chief: Geoff Syme. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 930035683@qq.com Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-07-05 12:37:55 (Due to space limitations, continue with the previous comments) For the first submission, the status of Reviewers Invited lasted for almost five months. During the period, several emails were sent to inquire about the status. The editor-in-chief and deputy editor-in-chief are very nice, and responded every inquiry timely explaining to me the reason (it is difficult to invite reviewers). The status changed to Under Review almost in February, and then the result returned in mid-March: Moderate Revision. There are two reviewers, and both reviewed very carefully, requiring verification of the reliability of the model (supported by more test data) in the content of the article. Fortunately, the data is readily available and can be processed directly. One of the reviewers also asked a lot of questions about the structure of the article (I submitted it for the first time, and the structure of the article was a bit confusing. Very honored to meet such a responsible reviewer). It was revised for a month, and most of the time was spent to adjust the structure of the article (a lot of additions and deletions were made in the process). During the minor revision, the reviewers again asked more than 10 questions because of the big changes in the previous version, and the revisions needed to be submitted within a week. Accepted within 10 days. [In the whole process, I’m especially grateful to the two editors and two reviewers for their responsibilities. During this year, another article of mine was reviewed by a reviewer in China, and the whole process was not substantive. Opinions were all about little faults of all kinds. Two re-submissions, two tragedies (I only mean those people I met), and I had no choice but to submit to another journal. In contrast, I really appreciate the responsible attitude of the reviewers.] ![]() ![]() |
Author: boym Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-05-11 03:52:29 Let me share my submission experience here. I hope it will be helpful for everyone to submit to JH. Feb 4 2019 submitted to journal; Feb 12 2019 under review; Mar 4 2019 with editor; Mar 4 2019 decision in process; Mar 9 2019 moderate revision; Apr 7 2019 revision submitted to journal; Apr 11 2019 under review; Apr 20 2019 with editor; Apr 20 2019 decision in process; Apr 27 2019 minor revision; Apr 29 2019 revision submitted to journal; May 6 2019 accepted; May 9 2019 accepted manuscript online. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 751496002@qq.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-11-19 17:23:29 The initial submission was in October. In January of the following year, I received review comments asking for moderate revision. There were two reviewers and the first reviewer raised more than 30 questions, objecting to the rationality of the method chosen. After submitting the revision in February, the reviews were returned in March. The first reviewer rejected it, and the second reviewer accepted it. I resubmitted in April and after two more rounds of review and revision the article was accepted in November. ![]() ![]() |
Author: drifteraaa Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-29 09:54:25 Hello, may I ask which editor you have chosen? ![]() ![]() |
Author: drifteraaa Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-28 18:03:26 May I ask which editor you are? ![]() ![]() |
Author: hhhwwwlll Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-28 13:28:20 I hope to have it reviewed as well. ![]() ![]() |
Author: fuqiang Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-27 09:27:59 My situation is the same as yours, and the EA status has changed three times. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 过儿虫儿 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-26 19:11:45 I hope my paper can also be submitted for review. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 过儿虫儿 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-26 19:10:45 4.10 Submitted to journal; 4.11 Editor Assigned; 4.19 Editor Assigned; 4.2 Editor Assigned: Good luck求好运 ![]() ![]() |
Author: neverfate Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-25 17:11:36 The first trial is over, and now it's directly with the editor. It's been eight days.. anxiously waiting. ![]() ![]() |
Author: yzbao Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-24 16:28:31 Did you receive opinions from three reviewers in the first review? Was it an additional reviewer added after receiving opinions from two reviewers? Or were all three reviewers' opinions received together? Thank you! Looking forward to your reply! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Jay1224 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-24 05:15:04 I hope my paper can also be submitted for review. 2025.04.08 Submitted to Journal; 2025.04.09 Editor Assigned; 2025.04.20 Editor Assigned (time change); ![]() ![]() |
Author: 不朽阳神 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-23 19:46:04 2025.04.05 Submitted to Journal 2025.04.05 Editor Assigned 2025.04.10 Editor Assigned 2025.04.23 under review (invited 8, accepted 1) sent for review at 3:30 pm Good luck indeed with the reviews, submitted at noon and sent for review in the afternoon. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 不朽阳神 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-23 12:56:16 2025.04.05 Submitted to Journal 2025.04.05 Editor Assigned 2025.04.10 Editor Assigned Today is April 23rd and it is still in the editing process. ![]() ![]() |
Author: TheYi Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-23 09:38:21 2025.04.07 提交至期刊 2025.04.07 编辑分配 2025.04.20 邀请审稿人 Translation: 2025.04.07 Submit to journal 2025.04.07 Editor assigned 2025.04.20 Reviewers invited ![]() ![]() |
Author: 洲瑜 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-22 13:23:07 2025.4.21 Submit to journal 2025.4.23 Editor Assigned The editor was assigned quite quickly. Looking forward to a quick rejection if the editor feels the quality is not up to par. Comments in the review section say that the review process is slow. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 来年秋风 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-21 18:39:14 Update as of April 21, 2025: Under Review (Invited 10, Accepted 1, Completed 0) ![]() ![]() |
Author: 立早 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-17 11:04:57 The first few submissions to JH were sometimes fast and sometimes slow, but overall, this submission was acceptable. The reviewers were quick, with three reviewers in the first round and two in the second round. However, it took a long time in the hands of the editor. Overall, it took less than 6 months, and the process was relatively smooth. 2024.10.24 Submitted to journal 2024.11.09 under review 2024.11.29 Required reviews complete 2024.12.16 Major revision 2025.01.12 Resubmitted 2025.03.10 Required reviews complete 2025.04.08 Accept ![]() ![]() |
Author: drifteraaa Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-09 19:50:48 Hello, may I ask which editor you are? I have been with EA for 25 days. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 用好金水 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-07 17:18:50 April 7th Under Review. ![]() ![]() |
Author: liamxw Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-01 10:31:56 I have been inviting for over a month, but only two people have accepted. It's really unlucky to encounter editors who are not willing to work. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 月亮 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-31 20:36:01 I have been waiting for 3 months and the editor is still assigned in the system without any response to my reminders. I want to directly contact the editor to try, can someone kindly inform me how to know which editor it is? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 飘飞的梦00 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-31 09:23:52 I also went through three rounds of revisions for this piece. Each round involved finding new reviewers, and each set of suggestions was completely different. I was on the verge of a breakdown during that time. ![]() ![]() |
Author: shild18 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-31 00:41:04 Overall, it was relatively normal, lasting three rounds of review: Submission on August 11, 2024 Major revision on October 28, 2024 Resubmission on November 21, 2024 Moderate revision on January 20, 2025 Resubmission on January 23, 2025 Minor revision on March 9, 2025 Resubmission on March 10, 2025 Accepted on March 29, 2025. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last (To Page |