JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE

2020.02.08 Submission; 2020.02.09 The system sent an email to confirm the submission; 2020.02.09 under review; 2020.03.03 Comments returned, major revision, 45 days; 2020.04.06 The revised manuscript was sent back, and the status changes to under review; 2020.04.21 accept Prof. Debora Berti, PhD Co-Editor Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. The following is my personal experience: this journal still values innovation, and the other thing is the integrity of the story. In addition to response to the reviewer’s suggestions in detail, the editor also gave a general opinion, including the format, grammar, and summary of innovations and so on, which should be answered one by one. The conclusion should be written strictly following the requirements of the journal. The paper has been polished, and I don’t know whether the other minor revisions are the same.

(5) Thank | 星星的空

9.16 Submission; 9.17 with editor; 11.06 major revision; 12.21 submit revision; 12.26 accept. The opinions given by the two reviewers were very professional. In my opinion, the journal had high requirements for innovation and novelty, and it was likely to be rejected or transferred for lack of innovation; in short, the processing efficiency of the journal was very high but the reviewers’ comments came late. If you are required to submit Credit Author Statement and Declaration of Interest statement during the second submission for review, it means that the editor value your paper and the article has an 80% chance of acceptance.

(1) Thank | 生的倔强和坚持

Aug 7 Submitted to Journal, Aug 8 With Editor, Aug 21 Revision Submitted to Journal, Aug 21 With Editor, Aug 21 Under Review, Date change, Sep 15, Major Revision, 45 days for revision, Sep 18 Revision Submitted to Journal, Sep 19 With Editor, Sep 19 Accept, Sep 20 Article published online. Good luck. I wish that every article would be accepted. It is my second article in Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. There were two reviewers. One that was a peer from large fields of research, required major revision and raised eight questions. The other had positive opinions. The editor was Prof. Julian Eastoe, the same as the first time. The editor previewed for a day or two. Pay attention to the journal format when submitting: three-paragraph abstract and came to the conclusion with references. The editor commented that “Competition for journal space in JCIS is very stiff (the rejection rate is over 70%)”. Rejection rate was about 70%.

(10) Thank | 试验优化设计

I think the journal is very good, the review is fast, and the editor is absolutely responsible. Personally feel that the originality of the articles are relatively high. Two reviewers: 1 review raised 10 small questions). 1 review proposed a supplementary experiment and a small common sense problem.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

12.2 Submission; 12.27 First review comments returned; 1.14 Resubmit: 2.7 Second review review comments back; 2.8 Resubmit: 2.19 ReceiveVery happy, the reviewers given by the reviewers and editors are very professional and efficient.Thank you very much

(0) Thank | 李夏徽

10.22 submission10.23 with editor10.24 under review (date changed 4 times)12.30 minor revision1.13 22:30 revision submited1.14 23:50 accept (received within one day, edit Prof. julian eastoe)The old-fashioned journal of interface science has high recognition in the industry, and the editing efficiency is very high. It stays for one or two days, and the rejection rate is about 80%. It has high requirements for innovation and requires a certain depth of theory. Other colleagues in the research groupThe second select of the select, the reason for lack of innovation.

(1) Thank | 试验优化设计

The first SCI,It’s worth it, a total of 6 submissions2018.10.25 submission2018.10.26 with editor2018.10.28 under review (the date of the period has changed, it may be submitted again)2018.12.04 major revision2018.12.17 summarize revision2018.12.21 acceptVery happy, but happy for half an hour, thinking of my own efforts, moved my heart, a cup of solution, in short, there is always too much bitterness behind the not easy and the person who supports you.

(11) Thank | 做一只化学dog

Submitted in mid-OctoberAt the beginning of November, the review was over. The overhaul was very pertinent, and the questions raised were sharp.Drag and drop for 20 days to repairReceive accept in early December1.5 months for sharing, 1 month for review, and half a month for revisionThank you for editing and reviewers. The second SCI

(8) Thank | 王同学

to return comments in less than two months.After the amendment, accept it directly.

(0) Thank | chemhehe

Received 31 Jul 2018Article revised 18 Oct 2018Article accepted for publication 21 Oct 2018

(4) Thank | 微光凌天河

4 months Already gone or no news...

(6) Thank | 123zy

7.30 submission7.31 with editor8.21 major revision (something happened during the period, it took more than half a month to process)9.19 22:00 presentation revision9.20 15:30 acceptVery efficient!

(5) Thank | 好丽友1314

Nanosorbent directionSubmitted on June 20th, returned to the overhaul opinion on July 9th, returned to change on August 24th, continued to review on the 26th, and returned on September 10.I selectd twice before and basically accepted it the next day.This time is relatively long, and I have been frightened for a long time, but the result is good.Thank you very much, I wish JCIS IF is getting higher and higher!

(0) Thank | xiaoxun204

When can I generate a district, then it is happy

(2) Thank | cnhk

A total of 20 days from submission to receipt, submission for review the next day, review comments for ten days, minor repair, return to revision after seven days, the next dayreceive.The questions asked by the reviewers are very professional.Thanks to the editor, thank you for the reviewer.

(0) Thank | 会飞的鲁

Is this journal going to receive the page fee?

(0) Thank | 化工小卒

7.6 days of submission, received the revised request on August 8th, overhaul, the comments are very pertinent and professional, returning on 8.28, receiving on the 30th, super efficient, thanks to the editor prof. deboraBerti, very NICE! I hope the journal is getting better~

(0) Thank | wangmm

8.1 Submission, 8.2 for review, 8.16 for comments (overhaul), repaired at 2 pm on August 28, and received directly at 6 pm.The journal is particularly efficient, and I hope that JCIS can be better and better!

(1) Thank | 2823425327@qq.com

Submitted on July 2nd, more than one month to the news, August 8th to return the revised comments, after the revisionUploading the next day, the efficiency is very high, thanks to the editor Prof. Debora Berti, the article on my is very nice, such a high IF thought it would be directly shot~ I wish the journal will be better and better~

(0) Thank | lafinner

7.9 submission, 8.3 overhaul, 8.20 return, 8.21 reception.high speed.

(1) Thank | 503731188@qq.com

From submission to acceptance within 1 month, received 2 review comments in about 3 weeks, after a week of reply, I did not expect to accept the notice the next day.Overall, the speed is very good, I hope to get better and better.

(0) Thank | KKSDF

From submission to acceptance just one month!

(1) Thank | 夜

Very good journals, the speed is also very fast, the industry recognition is very high, I hope that the impact factor continues to advance rapidly

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Very good journal, the speed is amazing, it took only 5 days from submission to receiving, the speed of the gods, the editor is too powerful, it is worth submiting.I wish you better and better.

(9) Thank | 海帆远航

TThe experience can be said to be very bad, the two reviewers, the opinions are very positive, the editor directly refusesIt is.The journal was invited to attend the meeting a while ago and refused. I don’t know if it has anything to do with this.According to the logic of this editor, only the kind of direct reception will not refuse.Will not select again in the future, huh, huh.

(0) Thank | ST