My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 477360 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ ALLOY COMPD
ISSN0925-8388
h-index145
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
8.901.1121.380
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Mechanical Engineering
Q133 / 596
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Mechanics of Materials
Q122 / 377
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Metals and Alloys
Q111 / 153
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Materials Chemistry
Q123 / 292

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)15.10%
Official Websitehttp://ees.elsevier.com/jalcom/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/JALCOM
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, PO BOX 564, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, 1001
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationSWITZERLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1991
Annual Article Volume4845
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0925-8388%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.4 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 7.6 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 81%
Data from Elsevier: 33%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 2.9 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/13)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS: Write a review
Author: 哈哈哈是我呀


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-11-07 11:19:24
Aug 13, Submitted to journal; Aug 13, With Editor; Aug 13, Under Review; Aug 18, Under Review; Aug 22, Under Editor Evaluation; Aug 23, Under Review; Aug 25, Under Review; Sep 02, Under Editor Evaluation; Sep 03, Under Review; Sep 22, Major Revision (It was sent to four reviewers, one required a major revision, two required minor revisions, and one agreed to accept it); Oct 11, Revision Submitted to Journal; Oct 13, Under Review; Oct 14, Under Review (I was sent to the fifth reviewer); Oct 30, Required Reviews Completed; Oct 31, Accept; Nov 05, Online. The processing speed of the editor is still very fast, mainly because the external review takes about a month. Thanks to the editor Thiagarajan Gnanasekaran. I wish the journal better and better.

(0) Thank | 哈哈哈是我呀

Author: 乐园小仙女


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-09-30 22:06:32
5.15, submitted; 5.19, with editor; 5.22, under review; 6.2, under review; 7.2, under review; 7.4, under review; 8.4, under editor evaluation; 8.4, major revision; 8.17, revision submitted to journal; 8.18, with editor; 8.19, under review; 8.20, under review; 8.31, required reviewer completed. 9.2, major revision; 9.15, revision submitted to journal; 9.16, with editor; 9.24, under review; 9.25, under review; 9.27, accepted. Thanks to Jin Li, Ph.D.

(3) Thank | 乐园小仙女

Author: Material-CHD


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-08-07 11:35:49
5.20 Submit; 5.22 With editor; 5.24 Under review; 6.5 Under review; 7.1 Under review; 7.7 Under review; 7.26 Under Editor Evaluation; 7.27 Minor Revision; 8.3 Revision Submitted to Journal; 8.4 With editor; 8.4 Accept; 8.6 Online. I saw everyone’s comments saying that it was slow and I was very worried, but overall it felt okay. Two reviewers, the first one was very positive and only suggested the language to be modified; the second one raised 6 comments. A minor revision was were finally required by the editor. The editor was Professor Xiao from Zhejiang University. The manuscript was processed very fast. The manuscript was accepted within 2 days after the revised manuscript was submitted, which was great. But it took a long period for the Under review in the early stage of review, and the review comments returned after two months. This was my first SCI paper in a top journal, and I can finally graduate. I wish you all the best in scientific research!

(20) Thank | Material-CHD

Author: daiviee


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-07-01 17:15:40
2.14 submitted to journal; 2.16 under review; 2.20 under review; 2.26 under review; 3.5 under editor evaluation; 3.7 under editor evaluation; 3.11 under editor evaluation; 3.20 major revise. 4 reviewers, three positive and one negative. The editor gave one month for revision. I applied for a delay because of the epidemic. 5.29 revision sent to journal; 6.1 with editor; 6.2 under review; 6.8 under review; 6.19 required review completed; 6.20 major revise. 3 reviewers, two recommended acceptance, one asked four questions; 6.28 revision sent to journal; 6.29 accept. It has been 4 months in total. However, the editor of Northwestern University of Technology, Professor Fan, processed manuscripts very quickly.

(3) Thank | daiviee

Author: 生如夏花08


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-06-29 13:42:18
Mar 03 2020, submitted to journal; Mar 06 2020, with editor; Mar 11 2020, under review; Mar 12 2020, under review; Apr 11 2020, under review; Apr 30 2020, under editor evaluation; May 03 2020, major revision; Jun 02 2020, revision submitted; Jun 03 2020, with editor; Jun 15 2020, under review; Jun 23 2020, required reviews completed; Jun 28 2020, accept. Thank you, editor Jennifer Aitken; the review was still very fast. Friendly reminder: The editor selected at the time of submission is uncertain, and the journal may reassign according to the research direction.

(7) Thank | 生如夏花08

Author: 论文虐我千百遍


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-04-22 08:39:21
The 380th floor continued. It was really too slow. If you have time requirements, please submit your manuscripts carefully. 8.14 submitted to journal; 8.24 with editor; 9.5 under review; 9.29 under review; 10.21 under review; 11.5 under review; 11.17 under review; 12.04 under review; 12.24 under review; 2020.1.06 under revision; 20201.17 major revision. All the comments were to change English in the recommendation of major revision. Three reviewers recommended acceptance after minor revisions. 2.14 with editor; 2.28 major revision. The first reviewer still thought English was poor and required modifying the language. My English is not good, but it would not be like this. It is not so good. I found an editing agency the journal approved to polish it and issue a polishing certificate. Then I submitted it. (The polishing agency basically did not change a few places, purely for earning money). 3.14 with editor; 3.24 minor revision; 3.29 finally accepted.

(2) Thank | 论文虐我千百遍

Author: zzq


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-12 21:32:25
The editor is slow. A few months for the review period.

(4) Thank | zzq

Author: are you sha diao?


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-22 10:53:54
Real pit, 7 months refused to draft, refused to draft the reason is that the analysis is not deep enough, you are giving a revised suggestion, Zhejiang University's Xiao editor, huh,
Show Review in Original Language
(25) Thank | are you sha diao?

Author: jingjingdadada


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-17 10:10:15
18.12.11 submitted to journal18 .12.16 with editor18.12.21 under review18.12.22 under editor evaluation19.1.02 minor revise19.1.06 revision submitted to journal19.1.08 revised submitted to journal (highlights word modification)19.1.11 with editor19.1.16 acceptThe speed is really fast, edit: Hiroki Sakaguchi
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | jingjingdadada

Author: happy healthy humble


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-08 12:50:41
contributed on December 7, 2018Rejection on January 7The time of change in the middle has been forgotten.My article is faster than my brother, and his revisions have been made for several months.It should be to look at luck.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | happy healthy humble

Author: 113


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-30 12:09:40
November 18th SubmissionSubmitted one week laterThere is no news for reviewing for more than a month. There is no change in the intermediate state.Speed ​​is really slow
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 113

Author: chentu


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-13 13:46:34
I selectd on April 18, 2018. During the period, I received the review comments on October 12, and three of the four reviewers gave it.The comments were revised and considered to be innovative. There was a rejection of the manuscript. The reason for the rejection was very simple and rude. The editor finally gave the opinion of the overhaul. The four reviewers submitted almost 30 comments. I made up the characterization and experiment and answered 4000.The word was sent back in the first 2 days of the deadline (November 11th), and then the editor sent it to the external trial. On December 7th, the editor accepted my manuscript.About 2 days or so, my manuscript has been online.The editor who handled my manuscript was an Indian. The person who sent the external trial was basically an Indian. I made a bunch of representations. Although the process was very long, I accepted it quite happily!I think it is important to pay attention to this journal. Don't push the manuscript. The draft is easy to cool.mutual encouragement!
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | chentu

Author: EJFaker


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-18 16:30:38
09.07 submitted to journal09.14 with editor09.25 under review10.08 under editor evaluation10.09 minor revise10.12 revision submitted to journal10.14 with editor10.18 acceptI am anxious to apply for the article, I feel that the speed of review is not as slow as everyone said, and the efficiency is quite high, thanks to UWaterloo's Holger Kleinke!
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | EJFaker

Author: 曲一心


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-18 03:06:14
8.239.6 with editor9.12 under review9.19 Overhaul9.29 repair10.15 minor repairs10.17accept
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 曲一心

Author: cangture


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-04 21:37:53
Last year's minor repair was dragged for 11 months, too slow, and has not been selectd for this issue.The select was fairly smooth, and the review speed was very good. It took 7 days to complete the external review. It took less than two months to accept it. The amount of submission was mainly spent in the editor’s hand.20180814 submitted20180828 with editor20180903 under review20180910 under editor evaluation20180911 major revision20180919 submitted to the journal20181001 accepted
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | cangture

Author: 起床困难户


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-26 15:52:50
2018.08.04 submitted to journal2018.08.22 with editor2018.08.28 under review2018.09.04 under review2018.09.10 under editor evaluation2018.09.16 revise2018.09.20 Revision Submitted to Journal2018.09.22 Sent Back to Author2018.09.22 Revision Submitted to Journal2018.09.24 With editor2018.09.25 AcceptIt may be due to a large backlog of manuscripts, which takes a long time in the early stage, but it is still very fast after the trial.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | 起床困难户

Author: Akari10032


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-26 11:42:03
7.68.19 Overhaul Term of one month9.18 return9.22Feeling still very efficient
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Akari10032

Author: 萌


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-21 19:30:11
Excuse me, how long is the under review of this journal?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 萌

Author: xcuwlj


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-21 11:15:24
I really feel that this journal is not up to date compared to other journals.I hope to speed up the review, there should be more articles to post
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | xcuwlj

Author: 菁聪年华


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-17 10:19:04
submit for a long time, but the efficiency is very fast in the later period. After the revision of the manuscript, I will receive it immediately. Thanks to the cook editor, very Nice!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 菁聪年华

Author: 916105989@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-11 11:34:59
Submitted on May 30, received on September 10, and overhauled twice in the middle, only received
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 916105989@qq.com

Author: 等文章考博那!!


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-07 20:06:54
Three months have not received the results, no more than Kaobo can not use the true heart slow in this life if you do researchI will consider this journal again, sad!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 等文章考博那!!

Author: 麦爱洲


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-05 00:30:39
Initial Date Submitted May 26, 2018Accept Sep 04, 2018

 All the way to the twists and turns, selected a material chemistry reviewer, a total of three reviewers, a life and death is not uniform, the comments can be written more than one article, and finally even the editor ignored him, the third trial directly accept
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 麦爱洲

Author: zhizaibide


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-03 20:17:19
6.25 Submission, intermediate submitted to journal 3 weeks, then one week to give advice, 8.5 major revision, 8.25 repair, 8.30 accepted.quite fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | zhizaibide

Author: 13273027056@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-03 11:11:50
6.13 contribution, then the middle has beenSubmitted to journal7.8 with editor7.13 under review8.6 major revision8.17 submitted to journal8.22 accept
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 13273027056@163.com

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/13)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service