It is still “Awaiting Admin Processing” for 18 days since it was submitted on October 20.

(1) Thank | superaelisa

2020.03.20, submission; 2020.04.03, awaiting reviewer assignment; 2020.04.10, awaiting reviewer scores; 2020.04.20, awaiting AE recommendation; 2020.04.21, major revision; 2020.04.28, revision submitted; 2020.04.30, awaiting reviewer assignment; 2020.06.13, minor revision; 2020.06.14, revision submitted; 2020.06.23 accept.

(11) Thank | 如花美眷郭德纲

Submitted on May 28, 2019; a major revision was required by the editor until November 12; resubmitted on November 21, and it was sent for review again. After waiting for almost two months, a minor revision was required on January 13, 2020; resubmitted on January 18, and it was accepted on November 23. It took about 8 months in total. I feel that the overall revision is relatively smooth, but the review time is a bit too long. I urged it twice in this period, but the editor is still relatively friendly.

(3) Thank | xixi682

Review period is a few months. However, I personally feel that the editing is very good and very patient.

(28) Thank | 静以轩楠

Hello, do I need to pay a layout fee for this magazine?

(0) Thank | xu

Just submitted the article and it is already showing as "Under Review". Does this mean it is still in the hands of the editor? Will there be a status change or will I receive a notification via text for external review?

(0) Thank | 凡一一

What is the status after minor revisions? My paper after minor revisions is still in the reviewer selection stage.

(0) Thank | Gene+Model+Wheat

2024.02.04 Submitted
2024.05.10 Major revision suggestions
2024.05.16 Revised
2024.06.21 Minor revision suggestions
2024.06.22 Revised
2024.06.25 Accepted

(0) Thank | 补刀12

under review outside audit

(0) Thank | Gene+Model+Wheat

It has been one month since the submission, and the status has been under review. Will there be any other status changes between submission and receiving feedback? Does "under review" mean it is being reviewed by external reviewers?

(0) Thank | epimy

Rejection reason: The content of the article is biased towards germplasm resources and genetic breeding, and the nitrogen fertilizer treatment is "artificial," so it is not suitable for publication in this journal, and it is recommended to transfer it to a breeding journal

(0) Thank | 清河张

Try sending an email to the editor-in-chief to remind them, this magazine is originally slow, but the slow pace most likely means the article has been accepted.

(0) Thank | 易之

I'm really worried. It's been 7 months since I submitted it in February 2022, and the status has always been "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" without any updates. Is there something wrong? I've sent reminders 4 times, but haven't received any response.

(0) Thank | 忽然慧慧都

Submission 22-Oct-2021
Major Revision submitted (21-Jan-2022)
Minor Revision submitted (07-Apr-2022)
Minor Revision submitted (17-Jun-2022)
Accepted (24-Jun-2022)
A total of 3 reminders were sent. The low publication volume is not without reason. The editor is very prompt, sending reminders in the morning and seeing dynamic changes the next day or in the afternoon. It is not recommended to rush the graduation submission. Reserve one year of time.

(1) Thank | 寒天晨晨

Xiao Xiu has returned, it has been 40 days already, and we are still waiting for a decision. I give up. It's so slow, painfully slow.

(0) Thank | 寒天晨晨

Editor-in-chief, the initial review has taken about 7 months, and there has been no response even after two reminders. Just wait, don't worry.

(0) Thank | 易之

There will be news after 7 months. After a week of major repairs, there will be minor repairs. After a week of minor repairs, it will be ready for collection.

(0) Thank | 易之

2020.12.11 Submission
2021.03.09 Major revision
2021.04.30 Major revision
2021.05.07 Minor revision
2021.05.27 Acceptance
My junior sister has submitted to this journal before and felt it was good. Overall, my submission went smoothly. The journal is excellent and the editors are great. I wish the journal continues to improve, with a significant increase in impact factor, and early inclusion in the first quartile.

(0) Thank | 笑纳接受

It has been 6 months, crying while waiting for reviewer scores.

(0) Thank | 易之

Who is your editor? I have sent three reminders but received no response.

(0) Thank | 易之

"Three reminders have already been sent, but there has been no response. May I know who your responsible editor is?"

(2) Thank | 易之

In the article status section of the submission system, there is a "Contact Journal" button, through which you can directly send inquiry emails.

(0) Thank | 补刀12

May I ask if you are contacting ADM or the journal Jacs@julius-kuehn.de?

(0) Thank | 易之

2021.01.03 Submission
2021.04.16 Major revision
2021.04.19 Revised
2021.04.20 Minor revision
2021.04.22 Revised
2021.04.26 Accepted

Before the reviewer's comments came out, the status of the manuscript always showed "searching for reviewers." When it had been three months since the submission, I sent an email to the editor inquiring about the status. The editor said there was one reviewer's comment, but they couldn't find the second reviewer. They asked me to send a reminder email in two weeks. When I asked again after two weeks, the editor sent me the comments from the first reviewer and also provided some suggestions for improvement. They asked me to make the revisions and provide possible reviewers for the next round. After I revised the manuscript, I thought the editor would start looking for reviewers again, but they quickly returned with minor revisions. In fact, they just asked me to remove the highlighting from the previous major revision and create a final version. I realized that it meant the manuscript was likely to be accepted, but I also doubted if it was just to find the next reviewer. After a few days, I received an email saying that the manuscript was accepted. I noticed that the first reviewer actually reviewed my article around one week after my submission. It was probably difficult to find the second reviewer in the early stages, which caused the delay, but it was very fast afterwards. Overall, the editor was very good, both in handling the manuscript and replying to emails.

(4) Thank | 补刀12

Did you get any results?

(0) Thank | 易之