The first review lasted one month, two reviewers recommended minor revisions and no additional experiments was required. I feel pretty good. But it has been 20 days since revised submission, it’s still Under Review, the time of status have not changed. Is anyone in the same situation? The brothers who also submitted manuscripts said that they processed the revised manuscript fast!

(9) Thank | 一投就有

I saw that an undergraduate from a certain college published nearly 10 articles in this journal, which is really amazing. ------------------As far as I know, most papers that International Immunopharmacology used to publish were research papers. As a classic time-honored journal in the field of immunopharmacology, although the IF is not so high, the reputation has always been good. In recent years, with the development of bioinformatics, editors occasionally received such pure bioinformatics articles that he found quite interesting and published them. There were eight or nine associate editors. Every time this buddy submitted a manuscript with a different last author, no one noticed that they were all this buddy's masterpiece. This time this guy injured the journal and blocked the way of many others. It is said that the journal is taking this matter seriously.

(12) Thank | SIMMImmunology

After submitting the manuscript, a major revision was required one month after the first review, and three months were given. I finished it in half a month, but did not make up most of the experiments required, because there were no conditions in the laboratory. Explanations were given for those parts, and it was accepted directly after half a month after the overhaul. The reviewer looked carefully and asked a lot of questions. As long as each problem is solved and a reasonable explanation is given if it cannot be solved, the reviewer will not embarrass you too much.

(1) Thank | Zhimiao Zou

Personally think that the journal has relatively easy acceptance.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

Is it normal for the review process to take so long? It has been 5 days and I am still "with editor".

(0) Thank | liunian xie

Hello, my days have been with the editor recently, it seems like it's a technical review.

(0) Thank | 刘娇娇

How long until it is submitted for review later?

(0) Thank | 刘娇娇

How long will it take to submit for review later?

(0) Thank | 刘娇娇

4.11 Submission
6.21 Review comments received, a total of two reviewers, with 17 comments.
6.30 Revision
7.3 Acceptance.

(0) Thank | smart宋

Do you still accept bibliometrics?

(0) Thank | 是宝宝吖

Could you please tell me how to view the specific process? On which day did the reviewer accept the invitation? On which day did they complete the review?

(0) Thank | grinning

Half an hour ago, I was hired. Let me update the timeline:
4.15 Third reviewer accepted the review.
4.27 Comments from the third reviewer returned, and both reviewers completed the review, automatically leading to RRC.
4.28 Editor requested major revisions.
5.3 Revised manuscript submitted for second review.
5.4 Submitted for review.
5.13 RRC.
5.15 Editor requested major revisions.
5.20 Revised manuscript submitted for third review, sent for review the same day.
5.29 RRC.
5.30 Accept.

The first reviewer was obviously an AI reviewer, and their comments were quite silly. However, they were kind and had a bias in their opinions.
The second reviewer was very sharp, hitting the main points directly, and even mentioned concerns about the scientific rigor of the article. I am not sure if it will require major revisions, I even thought they might recommend rejection in the first review. But it seems like in this journal, major revisions + rejection = rejection, so it is likely to be major revisions.

For the second review, I was quite casual in addressing the comments from the first reviewer, but they still said I addressed all their concerns...haha, what a lenient reviewer.
In the second review, the second reviewer still found some errors in my manuscript. This person indeed paid attention to detail.

After 8 days of revisions for the third review, the second reviewer also accepted it. I thought this person might have some negative comments again, and it almost scared me to death.

(0) Thank | 晚风吻尽荷花叶

I am also in this state, what state are you in now?

(0) Thank | Wang jingtao

Oh my goodness, I don't need external validation.

(0) Thank | 冰凌忍冬

It shouldn't be, right?

(0) Thank | 冰凌忍冬

How is everything going?

(0) Thank | 冰凌忍冬

I also want to ask how long it will take for changes to be made after "with editor", and when can I be notified.

(0) Thank | 冰凌忍冬

3.13 submitted for review
3.13 invited 6 reviewers
The first reviewer accepted the invitation on 3.13
The first reviewer completed the review on 3.15 (accepted the invitation on the same day, completed the review in 2 days, this reviewer is super fast)
The second reviewer accepted the invitation on 3.15
4.10 added 4 more invitations (a total of 10 reviewers invited) because the editor thought the second reviewer had disappeared
The third reviewer accepted the invitation on 4.15

(0) Thank | 晚风吻尽荷花叶

After submitting my paper, I was rejected with comments, feeling frustrated. The main issue was with the writing of the paper. I wanted to ask if I need to change the title of the paper before resubmitting it? Is the problem of duplicate paper titles preventing submission?

(0) Thank | 北方大虾

After I went back for rework, my speed was not as fast as the first review. Have you got any results?

(0) Thank | 我懒

Please translate the following paragraph into English: "Shabi Chinese Academy of Sciences."

(0) Thank | 小卖铺老板

Region 2, subregions 2 and 3, not top.

(0) Thank | 小卖铺老板

Does anyone know what the latest partition is?

(0) Thank | 爱学医的墩墩

Could you please tell me if you send emails directly to the editor for inquiries? My submission has not been updated for over 40 days, and it seems like the responses to emails are automated. Is there a way to directly contact a specific editor to follow up on my submission?

(0) Thank | wmomo

Both the editor and the reviewers are very serious, and their suggestions are particularly insightful and helpful. The overall content of the article is quite rich. After receiving the first round of suggestions, I consulted a large amount of literature, supplemented and improved the content of the article, ensuring logical coherence. The revised version was accepted.

(0) Thank | 璐瑶y