Slow!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Just include it in the cover letter.

(0) Thank | XWZRBY

Hello! I also received feedback from the editor like you. When uploading the response to editor file, should I choose the type "response to reviewers"? There is no option for "response to editor" available.

(0) Thank | 论文全中

Hello, is the editing for plagiarism check done at the initial stage when you submit your work? Does the overall similarity rate not include the references?

(0) Thank | loop2025

Hello, is the editing and plagiarism check done at the stage when you first submit your work?

(0) Thank | loop2025

Hello, OP. I also received feedback from the editor. When uploading the response to the editor file, should I choose the type "response to reviewers"? Additionally, do I need to use a different color to mark the modifications in the original text?

(0) Thank | 多看论文少吃肉

Could you please ask everyone if the reviewers for the second round of review in this journal often decline the invitation?

(2) Thank | Accept!!!！

Original: 楼主，你一审几个审稿人

Translation: OP, how many reviewers do you have for the first review?

(0) Thank | kangzai123

OP, are you the first reviewer or the second reviewer?

(0) Thank | kangzai123

Can you please provide a detailed explanation of your review process?

(0) Thank | kangzai123

OP, what kind of draft are you reviewing for Xiao Xiu?

(0) Thank | kangzai123

OP, what is your major?

(0) Thank | kangzai123

Now I have reviewed two articles. The first article is very good, scoring 90 points. I made 6 minor suggestions for improvement, slightly stricter than before. If the author incorporates at least two of my suggestions, I will accept the article for publication as it is well-written, clean, innovative and well-researched. However, the quality of the second article is much lower. It adopts a minimalist approach, with very limited and small training and testing datasets. The writing style is also immature and does not seem typical of a Chinese author. It feels like it may have been a master's thesis submitted to meet graduation requirements. I gave it a score of 60 and suggested major revisions. I hope the author can make necessary improvements.

(0) Thank | Wy11

Limit comments to 500 words, and then I will continue:
On the evening of April 12, 2025, after quickly making the modifications to the article as his suggestions did not require major changes to the overall structure, his request was simply to emphasize key points and increase discussion. I wrote a three-page response to the editor based on his 12 suggestions, made some further adjustments to the article, and resubmitted it.
April 13, 2025 was a quiet day, and in the evening I checked the system and saw that it was in the waiting for editor (WE) status.
April 15, 2025, woke up in the morning and checked my email to find out that the article had been sent to peer review. Ten reviewers have been invited, and the review results have not been released yet. I will update in real-time.

(1) Thank | Wy11

Submitted around 9am on 04/12/2025, I received feedback on my paper at 9:01pm the same day. The editor reviewed my paper and sent it back to me immediately. They provided 12 suggestions, including a request to modify the abstract, add data, adjust the format, include citations from this journal, express doubts about my data, compare with the state of the art, emphasize theoretical significance, and various other issues. However, the editor's feedback was generally positive towards my paper, possibly because they found the title interesting. They said: "I have had a chance to read through your manuscript. The manuscript’s topic is interesting and is within the scope of IP&M. However, there are some changes you would need to address before the manuscript can be sent for formal review." Seeing the possibility of entering peer review, I immediately went to make revisions.

(0) Thank | Wy11

The journal's second review requires major revisions or the manuscript will be rejected and asked to resubmit, it's too harsh. Hopefully, the reviewers can be more lenient.

(0) Thank | Accept!!!！

Just reviewed a submission, gave some minor revisions, overall feel the quality of the submission is very good.

(0) Thank | Wy11

25.4.5 submit
25.4.6 send back to author
25.4.7 submit
25.4.8 with editor

(0) Thank | som tara

Hello, may I ask how many reviewers are there for your first round of review?

(0) Thank | loop2025

Excuse me, do reviewers often accept but not review for this journal? Do we just have to wait in this situation?

(0) Thank | 无条件哈哈哈

I wanted to ask, how long did it take for you to get the results in the end? I've been waiting for several days too...

(0) Thank | ccwait

It has been a month since the last time we sent the new reviewer, reminding them hasn't worked either. I wonder if they have gone on vacation.

(0) Thank | NLP小白

Submitted on 24.10.20 for minor revision on 3.6, resubmitted on 3.10, accepted on 3.11.

Started submitting since April last year, revised twice, rejected and resubmitted once, endured for a year. But mainly delayed by reviewers. The editor-in-chief is indeed a workaholic with very high efficiency.

(0) Thank | simpsun

Submitted on January 17, 2025, under review on the 19th of the same month. Currently, there are 4 reviewers reviewing the manuscript, with 3 already completed the peer review process. How long will it take to receive the first review result?

(0) Thank | baxiy

Can't wait anymore. Since 1.1, it's been with the editor. Sent a reminder in between. Waiting for the official response.

(0) Thank | 老发呆