The first review lasted for four months, and there was a total of four experts. Two reviewers’ opinions were difficult to answer. It got accepted after two months. Thanks to the reviewers. I agree with what was said by the previous poster. Generally speaking, it is a good journal, but many articles are of the level around Q2. There is still a gap with TRNS.

(31) Thank | 勇往直前吧

The paper was submitted three months ago. During the period it was under review twice, and under editor evaluation twice. I don’t know what the situation is. You can join the group at 561729076 to communicate with each other.

(88) Thank | 教书育人

Although it is not a CCF recommended journal, the quality has improved significantly in the past two years. My two submissions were rejected. The rejection rate is indeed higher than Trans. However, all manuscripts are resubmitted to the journal after rejected by Trans. This rejection rate itself has no reference significance. There must be no objection to choose trans rather than this one.

(20) Thank | kcg

One month review. Reviewer level is high. Overall, it is still a very good journal.

(0) Thank | wer

In the morning of the same day, the review results were emailed out in the evening.

(0) Thank | Finley

Is it still WE now?

(0) Thank | hjkluo

How are things going now?

(0) Thank | hjkluo

It's been 30 days, has the reviewer disappeared?

(0) Thank | legal

What reason did they give?

(0) Thank | curry-zhao

After the minor repair, can it still be rejected?

(0) Thank | curry-zhao

Last year went by quickly. This year has been incredibly slow. The rework has been under review for two months, and there has been no news from RRC for almost a month. The journal is pretty good, but it's just not suitable for those close to graduation or in a rush.

(0) Thank | loddg

Boss, was the initial status of your submission on that day "we" or "stj" before it changed to "we"?

(0) Thank | mm

Hello, boss. Are you in a state of submission just like "we", or do you have STJ?

(0) Thank | mm

1. Submitted in August 2024.
2. In December of the same year, major revisions were requested by three reviewers. They were given three weeks to respond.
3. In March 2025, minor revisions were made and an additional reviewer was consulted, making a total of four reviewers. Three of them agreed to accept the paper. They were given two weeks to respond.
4. Rejected in July 2025, the editor called in two new reviewers who provided a lot of criticism.
In total, there were 3 rounds of reviews involving 5 reviewers. The third round was delayed for a long time, solely at the discretion of the editor.

(0) Thank | yoyoyahha

1. Submitted in August 2024.
2. In December of the same year, major revisions were requested with input from three reviewers. A deadline of 3 weeks was given for the revisions.
3. In March 2025, minor revisions were requested and an additional reviewer was consulted, making a total of 4 reviewers with 3 agreeing to accept the submission. A deadline of 2 weeks was given for the revisions.
4. Rejected in July 2025 and the editor contacted 2 new reviewers who provided a lot of criticism.
Overall, there were 5 rounds of reviews, with the third round intentionally delayed for a long time, solely based on the mood of the editor.

(0) Thank | yoyoyahha

Did DIP produce any results? How many days has it been?

(0) Thank | 橘络

Hey guys, is it normal for a paper to be accepted without revisions on the first submission, without any suggestions for changes? Is this a sign that it will be desk rejected?

(0) Thank | mm

May I ask how long it takes for your dip test to show results?

(0) Thank | 橘络

On July 19th, received feedback from five reviewers, suggesting a major revision.

(0) Thank | Finley

Oh my goodness, is there still this operation? Won't they give a major overhaul anymore?

(0) Thank | Meilusin

Yes, it's "we"

(0) Thank | hs

Where to see who is assigned to.

(0) Thank | hs

I am unlucky and have no tricks.

(0) Thank | wmhnnn

Brother, what's going on? Can a major overhaul still be rejected? I'm now in the first review of DIP and I'm very anxious.

(0) Thank | ttcsy

Rejected after the major overhaul.

(0) Thank | wmhnnn