Let’s talk about my submission experience. It is the second article being accepted. There were three reviewers in the first review, one of them accepted it, one required minor revision, and one rejected it. The editor rejected it. The reviewer who gave rejection was very serious, he firstly affirmed our work, including the plan, theoretical analysis, etc., and gave a good evaluation. The only thing was that the editor thought our assumptions were problematic. So, the editor gave the rejection finally. I was not reconciled to this result, so I sent an email to the editor-in-chief, explained the rationality of our hypothesis, and asked if there would be a chance to resubmit. The editor-in-chief was responsible, he wrote back in a few days and asked me to revise it carefully and contact with him when I resubmitted. I resubmitted it after revision in two weeks. The review was so quick this time, the review comments came back in about one month. The editor gave minor revision; the reviewers who originally rejected the manuscript gave acceptance. But there still one reviewer gave minor revision. This reviewer left me speechless. In the first review, he gave minor revision and asked me to cite four of his articles. To be honest, these four articles were not really related, but the scenes were similar. So I only cited two of them. In the second review, he still asked me to cite the rest two articles, which made me speechless. I had no choice but citing. I revised it for three days and submitted it. The editor-in-chief was awesome this time. It was accepted 40 minutes after submission. The editor was still quite responsible and replied the email every time. A controversial experience succeeded.

(13) Thank | 吴迪小哥

Generally speaking, the time is relatively normal, and the review comments are much professional. The specific opinions are as follows: Decision: 24-May-2019 Accept; Resubmission: 21-May-2019; Decision: 15-May-2019; Minor Revision Resubmission: 12-Apr-2019; Decision: 12-Feb- 2019; Major Revision Submission: 27-Nov-2018

(7) Thank | Wireless Lee

I submitted it in the middle of June 2018, and it was not until August 2018 that the editor sent it for under review. At the beginning of January 2019, the results of the first review came out, two major revision, one minor revision. At the end of January 2019, I submitted the revision. At the beginning of March 2019, the results of the second review came out, two acceptance, one minor revision. It should be accepted if there’s no accident. Maybe the content I wrote met the topic of this journal very well, so it went well. It was just the (period of) first review was too long, even though I sent an email to urge it.

(0) Thank | 大朱气气

Broad range and large backlog of accepted articles.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Could you please tell me if this journal offers external review? Is there a "with Editor" stage, or does it go straight to "Under Review" after submission?

(0) Thank | SCI冲！

投出: Launched at the end of October 24
大修: Overhaul at the end of March 25
小修: Minor repairs at the beginning of May 25
接收: Handover at the end of May 25

(0) Thank | ZH12

The speed is a bit slow, but the reviewer's comments are pertinent. After two rounds of revisions, the quality of the article has been effectively improved. Overall, the journal is quite good.

(0) Thank | ZH12

May I ask in what state it becomes ready for external audit? Currently, it is only in ADM and Under Review status.

(0) Thank | SCI冲！

The journals under PES seem to all show "under review" once submitted, without any external reviews yet.

(0) Thank | 3/2700

What is the status of the external audit?

(0) Thank | Timehh

It should not be.

(0) Thank | 接接接accept!

Hello, I am also on the same day. Has this journal Under Review been sent for external review?

(0) Thank | Timehh

Hello, has this journal Under Review been sent for external review?

(0) Thank | Timehh

18-Nov-2022: Original Manuscript Submission
02-Feb-2023: 1st Round Review: MAJOR Revision
22-Mar-2023: 1st Round Revision Submission
09-Sept-2023: 2nd Round Review: MAJOR Revision
01-Nov-2023: 2nd Round Revision Submission
07-Jan-2024: Accepted
08-Jan-2024: Copyright Transferred
02-Feb-2024: Published
Published in: IEEE Systems Journal (Volume: 18, Issue: 1, March 2024)

(0) Thank | The Frontier

Always been asking for no more than 12 pages.

(0) Thank | The Frontier

2024.11.26 Submit
2024.11.26 Under Review

(0) Thank | Climber

Do not accept articles with heavy military color.

(0) Thank | hunter_5

The impact factor is almost dropping below 3. It would be good if we could maintain it in the 3 range.

(0) Thank | PQOGJCK

Can this journal return to Zone 2 this year?

(1) Thank | 大头丸子

July 17, 2024    Submitted to journal

(0) Thank | wyyflww

Is there a page limit for submissions?

(0) Thank | chahahaha

Is there a limit on the number of pages?

(0) Thank | chahahaha

The pre-coding direction I submitted was submitted at 10 pm on May 21st, and the response received on May 22nd exceeded the scope

(0) Thank | 旅行者

Do you have any rejected articles that are beyond the scope? How long does it usually take to receive a rejection response?

(0) Thank | guo776

After submission, the status will be under review. What will it change to if an ADM is invited or enters the review stage?

(0) Thank | guo776