Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | FASEB JOURNAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | FASEB J | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0892-6638 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1530-6860 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 257 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 3.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.fasebj.org | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL, 9650 ROCKVILLE PIKE, BETHESDA, USA, MD, 20814-3998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1987 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 740 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0892-6638%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: Average 1 Month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 25% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on FASEB JOURNAL: | Write a review |
Author: 幸福猎人1991 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-11-01 15:33:01 The result of the first review returned in 45 days. There was no big problem. After delayed for a month, it was submitted again. They said that there was a term that was controversial. I revised it and it took me three or four days to submit it again. Then it was sent for review for half a month, and accepted in 4 days. It took about three months in total. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 殷先生 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-12-02 15:40:42 I submitted the manuscript on January 24, 2019. The first review result came back on February 7. It took 4 months to make up the experiment. The revised version was returned on July 9. On July 16, I received the notification that manuscript will be acceptable. Two months were given to make up the experiment. The revision was submitted on September 1, and it was accepted on September 16. It was online on October 24. The journal impressed me at the following points: 1. The first review charged $50, and the final publication fee was very expensive. It costed 20,000–30,000 in total. 2. The reviewers were very strict and all the original data of western blot must be provided. 3. The review speed was very fast! ![]() ![]() |
Author: maryZP Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-08-10 08:42:16 It took one and a half week for the first review after submission, and 60 days was given for the revision. It took 40 days to supplement experiments, and I submitted it after editing the language. So far everything was still normal, but it took 3 months for the second review. During the period, I sent 5 inquiry letters, but only the second one was replied by the editor. Waiting made me anxious. It took 6 months from submission to final acceptance. It was so slow. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 353683055@qq.com Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-04-15 21:07:09 Submitted on Dec. 27, and the review results came on February 5, about 5 weeks. Major revision and I was given 2 months. I revised it in 6 weeks. It was accepted after 3 weeks. Submission fee 50 dollars. Publication fee very expensive. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ssiktoday Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-05-29 23:16:52 Page charge fees Starting from January 1, 2022, authors who do not choose Open Access will be required to pay a flat page charge fee for each article (replacing the previous fee per page charge). For articles accepted in 2024, the page charge fee is $3100 plus any applicable taxes. For articles accepted in 2025, the page charge fee is $3255, plus any applicable taxes. From: https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/15306860/homepage/author-guidelines#author-licensing FASEB Journal requires payment of page charges! ![]() ![]() |
Author: ssiktoday Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-05-29 21:18:37 You can choose non-OA, but I'm not sure if there will be a charge. From the comments of other peers, it seems that even if you choose non-OA, you will still have to pay page fees in the end. I hope we don't have to pay. I will let you know if there is any information later. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 大红快到我手里 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-05-29 19:00:06 Do we need to pay for layout fees? Or can we choose not to have an OA? ![]() ![]() |
Author: ssiktoday Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-05-29 16:39:02 The first contact with Faseb Journal, overall feeling the reviewers were very professional, they even conducted additional experiments. The manuscript was submitted on January 23, 2025 and accepted on May 28, taking a total of four months and five days. The only regret is that Faseb Journal is no longer listed as a top journal in the second zone. When on May 25, the review process showed "Full version manuscript accepted for publication", it was exciting. However, the current status was under consideration, which was confusing. I wrote an inquiry and the editor replied very nicely, saying "...Your manuscript is tentatively accepted. It is going through the image screening process. Once that is cleared you will receive a final decision." Three days after the image review on May 28 late night (Beijing time 22:08), the acceptance letter was received. The letter mentioned that the proofreading email would be received in about 5-7 working days, and it must be completed within 3 working days. Wishing all colleagues smooth submissions. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 豆芽12 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-19 19:36:40 Could you please tell me the outcome of this question, blogger? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 一只西瓜瓜kkk Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-11 00:18:03 Under external review! Good luck sought. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 张雨垚 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-11 00:08:43 请问你的名字是什么? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 花落无音 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-10 23:02:54 Hello, where can I see the editing suggestions provided by the FASEB journal editor? ![]() ![]() |
Author: jenny_ Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-01-24 22:17:20 Hello, may I ask which editor reviewed your work? Chinese or foreign? ![]() ![]() |
Author: molly Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-12-05 13:50:01 The paper was published on 24.11.30, and on 24.12.03, I received an invoice from Wiley for a layout fee of $2940 for the traditional subscription model (non-OA). I checked the author's guide on the official website and indeed, even for non-OA, a layout fee is required. The price listed on the website for 2024 is $3100, which does not match the amount in the email. Has anyone else encountered this situation? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 小小肖123456789 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-28 16:23:18 Thank you very much to my editor and reviewers. For this journal submission, you can choose the editor that you think would be most suitable for your paper. When I submitted my paper nearly a month ago, I emailed the editor in charge to inquire about the status of my manuscript. She replied that they were still looking for a second reviewer and would provide feedback once they had enough comments. After a week, the feedback came back, and the editor personally acted as the second reviewer to provide comments (mostly minor issues). It was then that I found out I only had one reviewer, and the editor requested major revisions. A month later, after conducting additional experiments, I resubmitted the manuscript. Both the editor and reviewer handled the process very quickly, with the submission being processed almost immediately - submitted today, processed the next day. The reviewer raised one minor issue, which the editor approved for minor revisions. I spent the weekend revising the manuscript and resubmitted it. The next day, the editor processed it, the reviewer completed the re-review without issues, and the editor accepted the paper, sending an acceptance email the following day. The overall submission process was very comfortable, with the editor and reviewers working at a rapid pace (details can be seen in the images). I would be happy to continue submitting to this journal in the future. Thank you to the responsible editor and kind-hearted reviewer. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 蒙德采珍 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-10-21 21:48:24 Why can't I view the status after submitting the manuscript, and I can't find the status using the communication account either. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Bruce2024 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-10-03 12:16:02 Does the rework time given by the editor start counting from the day the editor sends the email? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Bruce2024 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-10-03 12:15:19 Could you please clarify if the rework time given by the editor should be calculated from the day the feedback is received and the email is sent? ![]() ![]() |
Author: panpan Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-27 14:11:21 Hello, may I ask if there is a resolution yet? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 安南殿下 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-26 08:25:30 No need to make changes, just wait for further instructions. If there are no issues, it will be sent to the editor. If there are any problems, you will receive a "Quality control check failed" notification and an email requesting revisions. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Adelaide Lawson Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-05 23:34:49 One week is not too long, you can wait a little longer. The workload of FASEB J journal is also relatively high, so the proof may take a little longer to be sent out. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 北冥浓绮 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-05 15:00:40 No need for manuscript submission fee anymore. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 北冥浓绮 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-04 20:12:48 Review speed: 3.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0 Emphasis research direction: Tumor; Exosome experience sharing: How long does it take to receive proof after acceptance? I haven't heard anything for a week. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 一阳运诚 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-04 13:25:19 I have the same problem as you. Have you found a way to deal with it? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 一阳运诚 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-03 20:47:05 Could I ask everyone, after submitting, the status displayed is "Quality control check underway", then I received an email about sciscorc, and the status is still "Quality control check underway". What is the situation? Do I need to make any changes to the content in the email about sciscorc? What should I do next? ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last (To Page |