It was submitted on April 7th and sent for review on the 12th. Minor revisions were required on May 26th. There were 4 questions. The revised manuscript was returned on 31st, and it was sent for review again on June 3rd. Then there was a long and endless wait... On July 10th, the review date changed. It is estimated that the editor found that the reviewer did nothing so he reminded the manuscript. It was accepted on July 25th. The mood is really like a roller coaster. I checked the ER articles, and there were many manuscripts which had been sent for review for more than one month after the minor revision, and I also saw that they were only accepted 4 months after the minor revised submission. It is really up to my fate to receive the results after the revised submission.

(9) Thank | 袖白雪

It was in the Nanomaterials Photocatalysis direction. 14 Feb, submitted to journal, and it was with editor directly; 18 Feb, under review; 21 Feb, under editor evaluation; 23 Feb, revision was required. There were 2 reviewers and 8 comments in total; 25 Feb, revision submitted to journal, and it was with editor directly; 27 Feb, under review; 02 Mar, accept. 03 Mar online available. Thanks a lot to editor Aijie Wang!

(56) Thank | Mango

Submitted on the last day of 2019, it was reviewed for about a month, letting us make a major revision, basically answering some questions of the meaning of the article, which are difficult to answer. But it's easy to revise the article. I modified it for a week and submitted it, and after another week, it was sent back and we continued to revise it because I misunderstood the reviewer’s comments. It was resubmitted the same day, and it took more than a week to be accepted on February 25. Overall it was very fast in less than two months. Don’t look at the reviews to know the journal’s speed. It mainly depends on the articles. If the editor is interested in your article and the quality is high, it will be fast. Now that the requirements have been changed, I don't know how useful SCI papers are. I graduated in January this year. This is my seventh SCI paper. I personally think it's okay. Students who are still in postgraduate, come on!

(35) Thank | 二班的男生

It is said that good comments bring good luck. I hope this can be approved and recorded before the May Day holiday. STJ on April 30th.

(0) Thank | Xiangfeng Bu

4.27 invited 19 reviewers, and currently 5 have accepted the invitation.

(0) Thank | zhuangy

2025.4.21 STJ
2025.4.22 WE
2025.4.23 UR
So fast, sent to 11 reviewers, a bit scared. I want to ask if this journal is OA? Why didn't I see the OA option when transferring from CEJ? I can't afford OA QAQ.

(0) Thank | Yu

25/04/21 2 reviewers, 3 opinions, thank you to the lenient reviewer.

(0) Thank | 啦啦啦elf

25/04/14 提交到期刊
25/04/14 与编辑联系
25/04/15 审稿中

25/04/14 submitted to journal
25/04/14 with editor
25/04/15 under review

(0) Thank | zhuangy

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 2025.3.30 STJ 2025.4.1 WE 2025.4.5 WE 蹲一个心软编辑

2025.3.30 STJ
2025.4.1 WE
2025.4.5 WE
Waiting for a soft-hearted editor.

(0) Thank | CC_NoCC

Hello, may I ask where can I see the number of reviewers invited for this invitation? The mini program is currently not working, and I would like to know the progress.

(0) Thank | 少管我

04-01 Invite 8, accept 1
04-04 Invite 15, accept 2
Accept one modification opportunity, please please please!

(0) Thank | 啦啦啦elf

I changed the time of my meeting on the 27th, but it has been a week and there has been no movement.

(0) Thank | Accept一万次

04-01 Under review, please contact the handling editor for the manuscript!

(0) Thank | 啦啦啦elf

I would like to ask which department you are in. I am in environmental process technology and submitted my application for the 29th position. I am still waiting for a response.

(0) Thank | 我想回家

Are there any EPT boards invested by friends? What are the speeds?

(0) Thank | 我想回家

25/03/31 提交给期刊
25/03/31 与编辑联系
25/04/01 与编辑联系
Looking for a kind-hearted editor.

(0) Thank | 啦啦啦elf

The difficulty of submitting articles to ER is increasing (due to the large number of submissions), and the quality requirements for manuscripts are also getting higher. However, the efficiency of the editors is still acceptable, so it is worth a try if the quality of the article is good.

(0) Thank | 顶刊收割机之锦鲤附体ing

How is the follow-up going?

(0) Thank | feiruyunduan

Just one day after submitting my application and it's already in the decision process. Does that mean I'm out of luck?

(0) Thank | feiruyunduan

September 26 submitted to journal; 
September 27 with editor; 
September 28 under review; 
A total of four reviewers accepted the review one by one within a week; 
October 24 revise, Environmental research seems not to distinguish between major and minor revisions, all are unified as revise, but from the comments, it should be a major revision (four reviewers, a total of 30 revision comments); 
November 13 revision; 
November 30 accept; 
December 2 online; 
December 3 proof; 
December 4 submit proof; 
December 6 officially published.

(0) Thank | 南星0729

Overall, it's not bad from what I can see from this submission. The journal actually processed it quite quickly. The only issue I encountered was with one of the reviewers, who kept bringing up the same problem that I couldn't resolve. I didn't make any changes, but the kind-hearted editor still accepted it. Grateful for that.

(0) Thank | 全都accept！

Did the editor accept it directly, or did they invite new reviewers for a third round of review?

(0) Thank | 张慧

06.19 submitted to journal
06.20 with editor
06.21 with editor
07.07 under review
07.08 under review
07.16 required reviews completed
07.20 required reviews completed
07.23 major revision
08.19 re submitted to journal
08.20 with editor
09.04 under review
09.05 accept

(0) Thank | 多多益善~

The editor requested the upload of the first draft in the email, but I forgot to upload the initial submission.

(0) Thank | 小菜包~

I would like to ask if you have submitted the initial manuscript when submitting the revised draft.

(0) Thank | 小菜包~