Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | ENERGY AND BUILDINGS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | ENERG BUILDINGS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0378-7788 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 14.80% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy-and-buildings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/ENB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA, PO BOX 564, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, 1001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Engineering | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | SWITZERLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Bimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 1135 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0378-7788%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 2.7 month(s) Data from Elsevier: Average 11.7 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Moderate Data from Elsevier: 39% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Article Publication Time | Data from Elsevier: Average 5.9 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on ENERGY AND BUILDINGS: | Write a review |
Author: 启航 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-06-06 15:43:37 Submitted to journal, 2020.03.24; With editor, 2020.03.24; Under review, 2020.03.26; Major revision, 2020.04.24; With editor, 2020.04.26; Reviewer invited, 2020.04.26; Under review, 2020.05.02; Ready for decision, 2020.06.01; Decision pending, 2020.06.05; Accept, 2020.06.06. The above are the timelines of the review process recorded in detail, for your information. It can be seen that the review time of the reviewers was basically finished in a month after under review; The comments of the reviewers were returned after major revision. Two of the reviewers required minor revision, one reviewer only have a word that the organization of the article was in a mess, which was opposite to the conclusion of the second reviewer: the organization of the article was good. It was estimated that this reviewer didn’t review it carefully. Ready for Decision and Decision Pending are respectively mean that the article is with associate editor and with editor-in-chief. The efficiency is high compared to other journals. ![]() ![]() |
Author: qwer123456 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-10-16 16:23:08 After submission, it was staying in the editor's hands for a week to find reviewers. Each time comments came back, the editor basically responded within 1 week. The submission cycle is mainly depending on the reviewer; the speed is okay. During the period, the reviewer delayed it for more than a month after one revision and I sent an email to urge. Three days later, the reviewer comments returned and it was accepted directly. ![]() ![]() |
Author: liusj2017@gmail.com Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-09-06 06:49:42 54 days to acceptance. Quite fast. Although it was an invited topic. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 潇洒_ Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-13 12:01:44 7/6 RRC dialed the wrong number. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 潇洒_ Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-13 11:50:31 ENB Second, share the timeline: 4/17 WE 4/30 Submission - 3 revisions, 0 acceptance 5/2 Submission - 4 revisions, 0 acceptance 5/12 Submission - 7 revisions, 1 acceptance 5/27 Submission - 9 revisions, 2 acceptance 6/15 Submission - 9 revisions, 2 acceptance, complete 1 7/16 RRC Submission - 9 revisions, 2 acceptance, complete 2 7/14 Major revision 7/21 Revision submitted + with editor 7/23 UR Submission - 2 revisions, 1 acceptance 7/24 Submission - 2 revisions, 2 acceptance 8/11 Submission - 2 revisions, 2 acceptance, complete 1 8/13 DIP + Accept The total duration is close to 4 months, slightly slow. The first-round editors and reviewers were quite picky (two reminders were sent in between), the second-round editor was Professor Hong Tianzhen, very efficient, highly praised. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 蚊子1234 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-04 17:02:27 I've been waiting for a week, still no response from WE. Do you know how long it took for you to be rejected? It's better to just get it over with. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ccccccc8888 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-08-04 14:12:25 The submission was rejected and the reason given was that it did not fit within the scope of the journal. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Yuu Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-06 08:54:59 Hello, may I ask how long until you are available? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Yuu Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-06 08:53:07 Hello, how long does it take to get from "we" to "ur"? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Yuu Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-07-06 08:47:23 6.20 submission and we don't know when it will be under review. It feels like it's taking a while. ? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 当一次天花板你 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-06-20 18:03:30 Is there any movement or noise? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 当一次天花板你 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-06-20 18:01:55 For nearly three months, only one person has been reviewing the manuscript. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 不吃糖的小硕士 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-06-10 08:16:22 How do you see yourself as the editor-in-chief? ![]() ![]() |
Author: accepter、、 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-06-09 20:08:24 Submitted in April, so far only one reviewer has been invited. After the review was completed, now going directly to the decision process... ![]() ![]() |
Author: dou Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-06-09 10:00:25 Hello, I submitted my paper on energy and buildings in early May, and it has been under review for a month without any results. Is this a normal speed? ![]() ![]() |
Author: June Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-05-30 09:10:21 March 22, 2025 Submit March 25, 2025 Under Review April 19, 2025 RRC 2 April 28, 2025 RRC 3 April 28, 2025 RC April 29, 2025 Major Revision May 15, 2025 Re-Submit May 16, 2025 UR May 26, 2025 RC 0→1 May 28, 2025 RC 1→2 RRC May 30, 2025 Accept ![]() ![]() |
Author: Terry Chung Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-05-14 17:42:36 I have also been in WE for 15 days, and the date has changed once. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Terry Chung Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-05-14 17:41:11 I submitted the manuscript half a month ago and it is still in the "WE" status. It feels like the review process is seriously out of line with what I have seen before. Should I send an inquiry about the manuscript? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 廷 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-05-09 10:03:48 Just want to ask everyone, when submitting the initial draft, do we have to strictly limit the number of pages to be within 20 pages? ![]() ![]() |
Author: KEEEV Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-29 11:29:01 Yes, I have been working for 10 days and still on WE, the date has changed once. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 潇洒_ Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-29 10:20:35 It has been 13 days since I submitted my article, but it still hasn't been assigned to an editor. Is ENB really this slow now? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 草文 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-24 08:43:06 Share a submission experience: If there are issues with generating a PDF format when submitting paper materials, simply convert the file to .doc format. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 草文 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-24 08:37:19 The first ENB paper, focusing on thermal comfort, was assigned to Cao Bin for editing. Teacher Cao was very responsible, and the comments from the reviewers were very professional. The two rounds of revisions lasted for 4 months and were accepted on February 21st. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 柠檬酸奶呦 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-16 10:52:35 May I ask how the current results are? Can the direction of power system optimization scheduling be submitted to this journal related to energy sources? Thank you! I hope to be hired soon. ![]() ![]() |
Author: jrlbj Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-22 13:26:41 Send 5 and receive 1, 1 is completed. It is currently in minor review on the system. The email has not been sent yet. Do we still need to wait for other reviewers? ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last (To Page |