3.23 Submission; 6.21 comments returned, requiring a major revision; 9.5 accepted; 9.14 Proofreading.

(2) Thank | NickN

The speed is really slow. Two months after the first submission, the reviewers suggested us to make a major revision and supplement experiments. It took nearly two months to make up the experiment and revise the paper, and then I resubmitted it. After waiting for more than 50 days, the status changed from with editor to accept. It was too difficult for me...

(3) Thank | Bxx

It was difficult to submit my manuscript on their website at first, but apparently it worked. Three months later I received reviews recommending major revisions. It was annoying because I had to redo my entire experiment, which took another 3 months. Plus, I had to rewrite most of my manuscript as a result. In the end, my paper was accepted! If I didn’t have to complete the experiments, this would have been a smooth submission experience.

(0) Thank | niming

Three months

(0) Thank | 苍风庆洲

A model diagram is a depiction of your theoretical model. This diagram is optional in the submission

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese, and title them ":" and ":"

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Is a model diagram necessary?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

Can my results include video results?

(0) Thank | Oswald Edie

May I ask, how long does it take with the editor?

(0) Thank | 半城~

Excuse me, can anyone tell me how long the review cycle is for this magazine recently?

(0) Thank | 太枝mio

Comrades who have experience in having their articles accepted can share their experiences

(0) Thank | Parker Smith

This is the only double-blind peer-reviewed journal I have submitted to so far. I don't feel like it's true that you only get accepted if you have a relationship with the editor or the editor-in-chief, the review process seems quite fair. I received the review comments 3 months after submitting, then spent 2 months revising (adding data). The day after submitting the revisions, it was accepted

(0) Thank | 妙音大叔

This is the only double-blind review journal I have ever selectd on. I don’t feel like it’s only related to the editor or editor. The review is fair.of.Three months after the submission, I received the review comments, and then spent 2 months to modify (complement data), and the second day after the revision was submitted.

(0) Thank | Jenniffer

I submitted an article on dental materials with a try attitude. Initially, it was difficult to submit this journal online, so I didn't have much hope. Three months after submission, the editor notified me of major revisions, and the reviewers suggested adding experiments. It took me three months to complete the experiments and almost completely rewrite the discussion section of the article. I didn't expect the editor to email me acceptance just one month later. The speed was acceptable, considering that the editor only took four months, excluding the three months I spent on experiments. I hope everyone can submit successfully!

(0) Thank | 百花芳林

Slow, there is no other way to describe it

(0) Thank | 苍风静涵

is slow, no other can describe it.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

In 2014, IF increased again and became the number one journal in the field of dentistry

(0) Thank | 削月悦乐

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed is quite slow. It is often submitted after three or five months with the editor. Then it is under review for three or five months. Of course, after entering the under review, it is relatively fast, and often onlyA review opinion.The editor only has two or three days to process the article each month. If it is an acquaintance, it will be faster.Of course, editors often skip the review process and directly cut the article or receive it directly.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review process is quite slow, often taking three to five months to be with an editor after submission, and then another three to five months to be under review. Once under review, the process speeds up relatively, often with only one review feedback. Editors only have two to three days a month to process articles, and if you know them personally, the process tends to be faster. Of course, editors also often skip the review process and either reject or accept the article directly

(0) Thank | 无极彦霞