Submitted in mid-October, and review comments returned one month later. Three reviewers, two stated that “Should be published in this journal” and one “Should be published as a VIP paper”. 10 days were given for revision, and we worked overtime in the middle of the night to revise and then resubmitted it. It got accepted in two weeks. I think the work is relatively new. I’m very happy to publish it on AM~

(29) Thank | 嘻嘻哈哈1234

Submitted on July 25th, and the first review comments returned on September 17th. Three minor revisions were required. The reviewers are all in the same field, and there were many insightful opinions. One of them was particularly careful. Revision was submitted on September 27th. The second review comments returned on October 13rd. The first reviewer raised a small question in response to our reply to the third reviewer. Resubmitted on October 17th. Accepted on October 29th. The first AM paper in the group.

(10) Thank | 老北京

I just submitted an article to Advanced Materials that I have done for more than 2 years. The research was not easy, but I gained a lot. I hope it can be accepted smoothly. I am very grateful to foreign supervisor for their support in recent years. This article is also very important and I rely on it to graduate~ I wish that the manuscripts of all the net friends will be accepted and they graduate as early as possible!

(70) Thank | Jason_323

In recent years, high-grade journals of optoelectronic functional materials and devices, nano-functional materials, and biological materials provide very good information on the novelty of materials and the performance of materials. This journal has high standards. If the editor feels that the quality of the article is poor, it will generally get rejected within two weeks. Generally, there will be review comments within two months. My submission experience: I received an editorial letter on the day of submission notifying me that the word count was too high, but that I could reduce it and submit again. I did so, and after one and a half months, I received the review comments and was asked to answer the reviewers' opinions. I uploaded a response to the review comments on the same day, received the acceptance letter the next day, and received the proof one month later. After two weeks, the article was posted online, and the journal page number was available four months later.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

May I ask if you are asking for the data check list to be submitted?

(0) Thank | 马克叔叔叔

Has anyone ever appealed to AM before? Encountered a malicious reviewer, damn it, how long does it take to appeal back? Such a waste of time.

(0) Thank | 谁曾是你这一首歌

May I ask how long it takes for a manuscript to go under review after being sent back for revisions by the editor? It feels like it's taking a long time recently.

(0) Thank | AM瞅瞅我

1/10 Submitted for review;
2/12 Received review comments, a total of 15 questions from three reviewers, with 20 days given for revisions;
3/4 Revised manuscript returned;
3/26 Article accepted.

(0) Thank | 万物生2

Did you go back to receiving after the repair? Were there any other status changes in between?

(0) Thank | HZY~

May I ask if the reviewer for this 30% minor revision after the second round of resubmission is the same as the one who rejected the manuscript in the first round?

(0) Thank | Alpenglow

Is this 50% rejection rate your opinion? Did the editor send the revised manuscript back to this reviewer again?

(0) Thank | Alpenglow

Have you been with the editor for so long??? It took more than twenty days to review???

(0) Thank | zhou-sy21

2025.2.26 with editor
2025.3.21 under review
The first submission to the top journal, success in the review, hoping for a smooth revision process!

(0) Thank | Till-I

Submitted on January 13th,
Returned on February 24th for major revisions and additional data,
Revised on March 3rd,
Accepted on March 20th.
Overall, the paper should be innovative enough.

(0) Thank | LabXu

May I ask how long it will take for you to submit for review? Thank you!

(0) Thank | 猫学长

2024.12.29 submit
2025.01.10 with editor
2025.01.13 under review
Today is 3.20, still under review
The wait is a bit torturous, hoping for a good outcome.

(0) Thank | 砚星河

OP, who is your editor? I feel like our progress is similar. My editor asked me to submit some additional data last night, but didn't reject the submission. The status is still "with editor."

(0) Thank | Till-I

3.19 Rejection, the reason for rejection is "Advanced Materials receives many more submissions than we can possibly publish."
It may be related to the topic, the submissions on biomaterials are too slow.

(0) Thank | 遇见飞

It has been two weeks with the editor, I don't know what the current situation is, and there has been no rejection or acceptance.

(0) Thank | 赵信

The review sent 19 days ago is still under review. It is uncertain why it is taking a bit longer, but at least it has been submitted for review.

(0) Thank | 蓝色雨天我

May I ask how you are doing? How long did it take for your submission to move from "with editor" to "under review" initially?

(0) Thank | 猫学长

March 14th, still with editor unchanged.

(0) Thank | 遇见飞

2024.06.18 submit
2024.06.26 With Editor
2024.06.26 Under Review
2024.07.26 Major Revision (15%/X/5%)
2024.09.02 Revised
2024.09.02 Under Review
2024.09.04 Required Reviews Completed
2024.09.04 Accept

(0) Thank | 老夫聊发少年狂

I have been editing there for 15 days.

(0) Thank | 邱明富

I submitted my document for editing on February 27th, and it has been 15 days now. Any updates or information on the progress?

(0) Thank | 邱明富