CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS

October 1st submission; October 2nd with editor; October 12th under review; November 9th required reviews complete; November 21st revision; December 7th revised manuscript submitted to the journal; December 10th under review; December 15th required reviews complete; December 19th accepted. The timeline from submission to acceptance manuscript was shared for your reference. The editor is Professor George Sergi.

(13) Thank | spring_sh

This is my first submission. Because the similarity score was too high (29%), it was rejected. After the it was reduced, the manuscript was resubmitted. 6.6 submitted to journal; 6.8 with editor; 6.18 under review; 7.15 submission needing revision; 8.2 Revisions Being Processed; 8.14 accept; 8.16 Completed accept. There were two reviewers, one paid attention to details, and the other paid attention to the overall research ideas. The latter one raised more sharp questions. I wanted to argue, but the supervisor suggested me to revise it according to the reviewer’s comments @..@, and it was finally accepted. I have learned a lot during the first submission. Thanks to the editor and the reviewers for their valuable comments.

(4) Thank | 野萌君

A research on cement and concrete, which I have submitted to CCC and CCR before, was rejected. I feel that other journals are not as good as CBM, so all four articles submitted to CBM. The reviewer number of the first three articles are two, three, and four, respectively. The reviewers' opinions were very professional and I feel it gets more and more strict. Basically, review comments were received in two to three months, and the manuscripts were accepted in four to five months. The fourth article was submitted more than two weeks ago and is now under review. I am looking forward to it being accepted smoothly... Please recommend relevant journals on cement and concrete, thank you! I really don’t want all articles to be submitted to one journal, and CBM receives many articles and self-citation rate is high. I don’t know how it is evaluated in the industry, and I don’t want to submit to a Q3 or Q4 journal…

(7) Thank | 取名字好难啊啊啊

This journal used to have one of the highest impact factors in the field. Given that I was finishing my doctorate, I figured that it was worth my time and effort to submit to this journal. I didn’t, however, expect to receive so many negative comments from the reviewers. There was a total of 3 reviewers; one of the reviewers offered very professional and constructive comments, while the other two reviewers hardly had comments worth my time. Now I understand why my colleagues’ opinions of this journal have diminished in the past few years.

(7) Thank | bbbb007119

The review speed and editing processing speed are relatively fast, and the review comments are more pertinent.

(0) Thank | eskdes@gmail.com

Connect to the previous one201809-10 Under Review, a reviewer has agreed to review your manuscript10-12 Required reviews complete10-12 Required reviews complete10-12 Under Review11-02 Revision with justification of criticisms11-04 April Submitted to Journal11-05 With Editor11-08 Under Review11-08 Under Review, a reviewer has agreed to review your manuscript11-24 Under Review, a reviewer has agreed to review your manuscript201901-03 Required Reviews Completed01-04 Accept

(0) Thank | 秤砣

Connected to the previous one.201805-25 Submitted to the journal06-25 Under Review, a reviewer has agreed to review your manuscript06-26 Under Review, a reviewer has agreed to review your manuscript07-28 Required reviews complete08-07 Revision with justification of criticisms08-25 Submitted to the journal09-07 Under Review, a reviewer has agreed to review your manuscript09-09 Under Review, a reviewer has agreed to review your manuscript

(0) Thank | 秤砣

The first article published in this journal is 2016, accepted in more than one month. This is the first review. The opinions of the two reviewers are very positive.Just one time, but the editor has submitted the review, and there is one more review. The first two reviewers have Pass, and the third reviewer has raised a scientific statement. I thought it would be directly received after the revision, and the result wasI was sent to the trial. The first trial was two months. I finally received it. It lasted nearly 8 months.

(0) Thank | 秤砣

2018.05.02 submitted to journal2018.05.04 A manuscript number has been assigned2018.05.11 under review (a total of 6 reviewers accepted for review)2018.06.08 required reviews complete2018.06.27 rejectThe review speed and editing processing speed are relatively fast, and the review comments are more pertinent.

(1) Thank | 小北287790927

2018.08.15 Submitted to Journal2018.08.17 With editor2018.09.27 Under review2018.11.05 Required reviews complete2018.11.09 RejectAlthough rejected, the efficiency of the journal is still ok.The opinions of the two reviewers, one of the reviewers, are more detailed.The requirements of the journal are not low, and I hope that I can provide a reference for those who want to contribute.

(0) Thank | 菜鸟一枚

The journal is very efficient. It was submitted on August 4th and returned to the review on September 14. It is very strange that there is only one reviewer, but it is a minor repair, but I don’t think much.Seriously revised the comments for half a month, returned to the revised draft on the 28th, accepted on October 6.The journal emphasizes innovation and is very fast on innovative articles. Thanks to Professor Carlton Ho, very serious, the first SCI, I hope CBM will maintain this momentum, and the impact factor will continue to rise

(2) Thank | Dr.Frank

Received 25 April 2018Received in revised form 11 August 2018Accepted 14 August 2018For reference only

(0) Thank | 大壮M

The first review, 8 months of review, 2 months of rework, no results.

(2) Thank | yuanbin1988

2018.05.09 submit to journal;2018.07.23 minor revision;2018.07.28 submit revised edition to journal;2018.08.02 accepted.

(0) Thank | sandy

Submit for 8 months, under review is almost half a year, the middle reminder three times, but there is no news, this journal is doingwhat?

(0) Thank | 一声叹息

The editor is a bit unreasonable. The review is for four months, and the comments are returned. The two reviewers commented on the overhaul and the editor directly rejected the draft...Especially speechless,

(1) Thank | hh

忐忐忑忑 用 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,Introduced a bunch of nature work, also introduced the work of SR

(0) Thank | 1233333

The reviewer is very responsible, reviewing the draft quickly, overhauling it, and directly hiring it after minor repairs.Still very lucky to submitted the first draft.Ha ha...Go ahead, come on!Share it together: 725554986

(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Construction BM requirements are much higher, the reviewers are very strict, this submission has been reviewed for a long time but was rejected, sad reminder.2018 Impact factor 3.5, one district journal

(0) Thank | 钢结构

A lot of journals and nature and science belong to the same area. If you can select in one area, you can select directly for Nature\Science.

(0) Thank | 123456789

Received 8 consecutive emails that agreed to review, which is the one that sang?

(0) Thank | 5824002@qq.com

This journal is actually in the same area as CCR?It’s speechless.

(1) Thank | 我来评论

IF is greater than 3, there will be some good articles

(0) Thank | metal

self-introduction rate 30, the annual issue of 3000-4000 articles, irrigation good place

(3) Thank | matr

11/15/2017 SubmissionThere have been no suitable reviewers, only 2/28 found two reviewers4/2/2018 Return to opinion, minor repair4/16/2018 Submit revised draft4/17/2018 with editor5/5/2018 RecruitmentThe first one is done.Fortunately.

(0) Thank | kejun