My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES]Hello, you are Visitor Number 93471 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCOLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
Journal Title AbbreviationsCOLLOID SURFACE B
ISSN0927-7765
E-ISSN1873-4367
h-index131
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.100.9291.095
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Q125 / 162
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Biotechnology
Q142 / 275
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Colloid and Surface Chemistry
Q25 / 15
Category: Chemistry
Subcategory: Surfaces and Interfaces
Q19 / 52

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)6.60%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/523888/description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/colsub/default.asp
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1993
Annual Article Volume894
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0927-7765%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.3 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 7.7 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Moderate
Data from Elsevier: 31%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 2.3 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-24 09:03:00
2012-3-24, Initial delivery to journal. 2012-4-19, The opinion is returned, saying that the format is not correct and the paper did not pass the technical review, need to correct and resubmit according to the requirements. Comments: 1. The language fails; 2. The chart exceeds requirements; 3. The order of the tables is not correct according to the template; 4. The paper is not carefully proofread.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 一只药学科研汪


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-02 14:23:53
on September 13th.Revised on October 9th, minor repair, two reviewers, 10 questions, relatively pertinent;Return on November 4th and continue under review;On the 20th of December, the second revision, a reviewer agreed to receive the previous review, and found another reviewer, and raised 10 small questions;It was retired on December 28th, and it was lucky to receive it on the first day of work on January 2nd. Thank you for reviewing the workman's holiday overtime.It lasted for nearly 4 months, which is relatively long. It is mainly that each time you go back to the reviewer, you will return it to the reviewer. The pharmacist reviewer did not see it and he has to go back to another reviewer for retrial.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 一只药学科研汪

Author: 490720612@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-27 15:51:54
Submission, the research direction is relatively new, the recommended reviewers are not reviewed, waited for more than 2 months, until the end of April, let the reviewers again, and at the end of June, they returned to the review comments, are someThe problem of clarify is not too difficult.After the question was answered, it was submitted in mid-July and accepted only in August.It feels really slow.This article was selectd on CC and was rejected by the second.Change select C
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 490720612@qq.com

Author: 676388738@qq.com


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-19 15:45:12
selectd on March 25th, returned to review manuscript on June 6th, returned on June 19th, directly accepted on August 14th, lasted nearly 5 months, this is what I encounteredThe longest submission time.The five reviewers, a total of 21 comments, are praised and not difficult to answer.The thesis has certain innovations, and it is written very seriously. The format is generally accepted according to the requirements of the journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 676388738@qq.com

Author: llf0807@126.com


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-18 15:54:23
2018.5.17 Submission, review for one month, two reviewers' comments, not much change,After returning, it was received directly after about one and a half months. During the period, the reviewer was changed. The reviewer indicated that the first-instance opinion was better modified, and several small grammatical errors were mentioned, indicating that it could be received directly.In the middle of the second trial, one reminder was made, and the editor was very NICE, indicating that the reviewer would be reminded to speed up the review process.The second SCI of the individual.
Show Review in Original Language
(16) Thank | llf0807@126.com

Author: 12345


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-05 04:48:23
Submitted on November 2nd last year, about the end of January at the end of January, I received comments on the review, two comments, saying that my writing level is too bad... there is a reviewer back and forthHe was replied three times and received on February 19.In general, it is OK, there is no situation that people can't receive too much...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 12345

Author: Jasperchen


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-09 20:53:50
I have a master's degree, and I submitted my first academic paper.One select for two and a half months to return to the opinion (because the summer is involved in the middle of the summer, it will take a long time), overhaul, but the problem is not difficult to answer, do not need to do the experiment; review the manuscript again after revisit, return to the opinion in 20 days, minor repair;After waiting for 20 days (with Christmas and New Year holidays in the middle), then acceptd.The editors work very efficiently, the reviewers are very responsible, and the opinions are very pertinent.Now I think that this journal actually has higher requirements for details, and the amount of data is average, but the article needs to be innovative, and the difficulty of submission is not too big.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Jasperchen

Author: 欢乐的树博士


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-28 17:24:36
The fourth time this journal was submitted, the old journal, the word of mouth is very good, and the difficulty of submission is not high.Write carefully, the picture is clear, and it has certain innovation.One and a half months of the first trial (the first trial time is mainly to look at the speed of the reviewer), the opinion given is a minor repair, a major repair, but the amount of data modified is not high, repaired after one month, reviewed for one month, received.In terms of format, the graph can be placed in the article or uploaded separately.The article format is relatively flexible.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 欢乐的树博士

Author: hkjl


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-08 17:10:49
2017.12.8. 17:00IF=3.369
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hkjl

Author: smilxin@126.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-03 17:35:10
The journal is very efficient. Professor Zhu Xinyuan of the country handled the manuscript very timely, received the modification notice more than 2 months, and the revised manuscript received the reply on the 10th day., received again after minor repairs.It lasted for 4 months and 5 days and was still very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | smilxin@126.com

Author: nick


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-21 11:32:15
is too slow, and is still submit to journal, really want to retract
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | nick

Author: yyk


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-10 16:55:31
Cast out for more than a month, or with the editor state.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yyk

Author: 爱你一万年


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-27 20:14:50
submitted almost two samples for review, one month later, was rejected, a reviewer, did not put forward any constructive opinions, I feel very irresponsible!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 爱你一万年

Author: 1096716722@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-03 20:02:13
5 months is not bad.
Show Review in Original Language
(15) Thank | 1096716722@qq.com

Author: 1525565367@qq.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-15 12:32:29
4 On the 25th of the select, there is no news at the moment. Today, the impact factor has dropped. The last time we selectd for one, and the trial for three months ended up with a very far-fetched reason.Refused....I will not select for this journal in the future
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 1525565367@qq.com

Author: wangbailiang2006@aliyun.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-28 14:16:56
The journal speed is still quite fast. It has been selectd about 4 times. Only this time, the domestic Chen Hong editor is very friendly!About 45 days to the news, minor repair, and then repaired back in 3-5 days.Thank you editor!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | wangbailiang2006@aliyun.com

Author: bhj


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-21 20:50:51
7 Submitted in the month, it took four and a half months to come back to review the comments, only one reviewer's review comments!Receive one week after submitting the revised draft!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | bhj

Author: lbf178888


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-01-24 06:45:12
The fastest experience of my submission is this journal, which has been submitted for less than a week, has not been reviewed, and received directly.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | lbf178888

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-11 14:50:00
4月28Submission; June 10, minor repair; August 8, return; August 20, English question, August 23 return, August 28, accept.The overall feeling journal has higher requirements for English, and there is a certain degree of innovation.The processing of the data is relatively strict
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-30 13:37:00
from the submission to the final acceptance for 5 months, wait for the crazy!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-08 23:28:00
The journal impact factor is steadily rising
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-08 16:11:00
2013.06.06 Submit the first draft; 2013.06.12 Technical review, telling up to 5 keywords, modify the submitted on the same day;2013.06.12 Submitted for the same day; 2013.07.19 Required Reviews Completed;2013.07.31 Review results: revise, one month; 2013.08.01 Submit revised draft; 2013.08.07 accept.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-07 11:39:00
October 31On the 4th, under review, November 14th, 15th, found 2 reviewers reviewing the draft, probably gave 3 weeks of review time, December 3rd, comments returned to minor repair due to 12.24, made up a small experiment, and repaired on December 21st.They have a holiday on Christmas, and the holiday ends on January 10th.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-05 10:16:00
2 The first submission at the beginning of the month, and the format is required after a few days.In mid-February, I modified and uploaded the results of the technical review. After that, there was no news. The status of the February 22nd display was under review. I don’t know if the journal format is correct. I don’t know if I’ve already taken it out. I’m looking forward to it.News
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-30 07:38:00
2011 Latest Impact Factors: 3.456
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service