19.10.29-submit; 19.10.31-with editor. It was assigned to editor Romain Bordes; 19.11.4-under review; 20.4.24-review comments returned. There was only one reviewer, and the editor explained that the review cycle was delayed because other reviewers refused to review. The reviewer comments are very moderate, with only a few small problems in the format and a small experiment that needs to be supplemented. A minor revision was required and the editor gave 21 days for revision. Because of the epidemic, I couldn't return to school to make up the experiment, so I applied an extension of 2 weeks. 5.24-resubmit; 5.26-accept. Although the review cycle is relatively long, it is still very smooth. I was also busy with other things in the middle and there was no reminder received. The editors and reviewers are great, and it has been categorized to Q2 in 2020. I’m so happy.

(3) Thank | 卜楞喵喵

Jan 1, submitted; Jan 2, with editor; Jan 9, under review; Jan 14, under review; Jan 31, revision; Feb 20, revision submitted; Feb 22, under review; Mar 8, reviewer requested completed; Mar 12, reviewer requested completed; Mar 17, accept. It was the last article before the graduation of master. Thank you, editor R. Bordes!

(5) Thank | Biu

2018.12.7 submitted; 2018.12.8 under review; 2019.02.19 revision; 2019.03.7 revision submitted; 2019.03.7 accepted. The manuscript was under review the next day after submission, but the reviewer delayed for more than two months, I submitted the revision at noon, and it was accepted in the afternoon. I am very grateful to the editor, Professor Franz Grieser, for his high efficiency. The comments of the two reviewers were not a big problem. A test chart was added, and the others were all minor mistakes in language and pictures. Overall, it was easy to solve. It depends on the efficiency of the reviewers. The efficiency of the editor is fast. THUMBS UP！

(2) Thank | 9渣8渣5硕

I submitted my manuscript in April and received the review comments in May. One reviewer wanted a minor repair and the other wanted an overhaul. Total of 24 questions. When I saw that, I struggled between changing the paper and giving up. Later, I had to write a letter to the editor and ask for an extension of 2 weeks. The editor was very kind and agreed to my extension, but I still had to really struggle to get the revised paper in on time. I uploaded the manuscript of the overhaul just before the final deadline and the editor gave me good news after 3 days, directly accepting it.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The first paper was reviewed very quickly, with feedback provided within 3 weeks of submission. After making minor revisions, it was accepted for publication within a week.

(0) Thank | Lavieen

Excuse me, how long did you have RRC at that time? I have had it for almost half a month.

(0) Thank | Smith

May I ask how long did you wait for the RRC at that time? I have been waiting for almost half a month for my RRC and still haven't received the results.

(0) Thank | Smith

I am also this editor, beware.

(0) Thank | XIYYYYa

As a reviewer, I have recommended three major revisions and one rejection, and directly rejected one.

(1) Thank | XIYYYYa

The article was transferred from another journal, and I feel lucky to have received it before graduation. Encountering a reviewer with sharp and persistent opinions, otherwise it would have been faster. I took a screenshot of the email suggesting transfer when submitting, feeling that it would increase the chances of acceptance within the Elsevier system. Editor Yi Zuo is also quite good.
Timeline:
- 250130 submitted
- 250130 with editor
- 250201 with editor
- 250216 reminder email
- 250217 under review
- 250302 required reviews complete
- 250318 review comments
- 250325 submission of response
- 250325 with editor
- 250327 required reviews complete
- 250409 review completed
- 250417 revise
- 250422 submission of response
- 250422 with editor
- 250428 accepted

(0) Thank | yesjam

What is the deadline for the first review given to the reviewer?

(0) Thank | waaaaa98

When submitting the manuscript, the editor chosen was Katsuhiko Ariga, but later it was transferred to editor David Chelazzi. After 2 weeks of submission, the manuscript was rejected due to lack of innovation.

(0) Thank | Nano M

This is the selected editor.

(0) Thank | aber

2025.04.07 Submission
2025.04.08 Accepted
2025.04.11 Accepted
2025.04.21 Rejected

(0) Thank | ma_wenjie

27 January 2025 Submit
31 January 2025 With Editor
6 Feb 2025 Under Review
18 March 2025 Revise Two reviewers, both with revision comments, totaling 14 comments, not difficult to address
27 March 2025 Re-submit
28 March 2025 Under Review
10 April 2025 Accept

(0) Thank | HDUer

How long did it take you to review the RRC for the first time?

(0) Thank | 猪在海中游

May I ask how long it takes for the editor to send the manuscript to the reviewer?

(0) Thank | waaaaa98

You are not talking nonsense, isn't this the normal process?

(0) Thank | msq.

I have been with the editor for half a month, but there has been no submission or rejection yet, and the selected editor is blank.

(0) Thank | Francis

Classmate, there is no corresponding editor for the revised manuscript. What should we do about this? It's quite urgent.

(0) Thank | sidhajsfgauf

Classmate, there is no corresponding editor for the revised manuscript. What should we do?

(0) Thank | sidhajsfgauf

Mine too, it has been 10 days and it is still pending.

(0) Thank | 吃嗯陈

This was transferred from another journal, and the scientific editor who received it promised it would immediately enter peer review. However, it has been a long time already. What should we do, my friends? TAT

(0) Thank | 壁古天蓝

3.4 submission, 3.9 with editor has changed slightly, 3.17 still with.

(0) Thank | 猪在海中游

Could you please tell me how long it takes to work with Editor?

(0) Thank | cactuses