Submitted on August 30, 2012 to the English version, the paper was reviewed for more than 3 months and comments were returned on December 11, with a request for minor revisions. The review process is slow, but editor is very nice. After the minor revisions were made, I returned the manuscript on February 25. Another minor revision asked for, which I submitted on February 26.  Still waiting for the result

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewing is very fast, one overhaul in the first month of the month, I dare not sneak in two months to return, the second trial is also less than one month of minor repair, repaired for a week, returned to receive a week laterAfter seeing the journal one month later, it is very fast and very efficient.During the period, I was a little dragged. The editor also sent a letter to remind him twice. The next time I also called directly, the editor was absolutely responsible.A good submission experience, it is easy to attract more excellent manuscripts, and it is estimated that the factors of such journals will increase steadily.

(2) Thank | climate

is equivalent to the journal BULLETIN

(0) Thank | bnu

Reviewing speed is fast and efficient, and submission is published for 4-5 months.English version.

(0) Thank | norman

8Submission of about 20 months, revised comments on October 15th, revised revisions on the 16th, and revised comments on November 6th.Received on November 8.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

under review After more than a month, it became Awaiting AE Recommendation. Did you encounter this status when you submitted the manuscript?What does this state mean?The inconsistency of the two reviewers requires the deputy editor-in-chief?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

5 On May 8th, the select on May 24 became editor, and Wang YuanHuo on June 21 changed the editor Fu Li back on June 24.Review comments, minor repairs will be revised on July 1st, and the next day will return comments, no changes to the content, so that the revised format will be received on July 3rd and will be received on July 4th!

(4) Thank | Anonymous

this time to select for the album, I am sure of the article, just look at the results of the review.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This impurity is too slow, selectd for 4.28, and is still reviewing it~ depressed!How to let the people support their own impurities ~

(2) Thank | Anonymous

contributed, make a mark 27-Jul-2012 Awaiting Editorial Office Processing3-Aug-2012 Under review

(0) Thank | Anonymous

meI selectd once, and I didn’t see a reply in four months. The phone reminded me three times. When I was five and a half months, my opinion came back. It seems that a reviewer’s opinion was unqualified. After retrial, the opinion came back in six months and was defamed.I am mad at me!!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

05 When I was studying for a master's degree, it seems that I have returned my opinions in two weeks. I simply answered a few questions from the reviewers and sent them back within a week. From submission to seeing fourIt seems like a month.It is a good publication to say that the actual scientific bulletin is a pity, but many of our articles have been sent abroad.There are problems with our research system.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Science Bulletin As the top journal in China, although the impact factor is not high, the submission has certain difficulty. In many fields, it is no less than the foreign influence factor of about 3 journals.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Last month, I was looking forward to

(0) Thank | Anonymous

. The submission speed is very fast. I have already selectd for two articles, all of which are in English (the journal gives priority to the English version).One of them decided to accept it and then translated it into Chinese (an article in both English and Chinese). If it is modified, it will not be a big change. It is a small problem, so it is relatively easy. Finally, it will give a lot of finished articles.From submitteding to getting the finished product, it lasts for two or three months, very fast!As for the unclear cost, I directly crossed out from our boss account. I don’t know how much.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

selectd twice and was rejected.The scientific circular is a comprehensive journal, and the mechanical sense is more difficult.However, I feel that the reviewer is very responsible and the level is very high!Novices may wish to select, even if not, the review comments are very helpful!However, the second part of the select was just rejected this morning. The author's review system did not even see the review comments, depressed!I am consulting the editor...

(1) Thank | Anonymous

I submitted the manuscript to the news (small repair) and waited for nearly 6 months. I feel that the reviewer and the editor are very serious, and the comments are very touching to me..

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed is very fast, the acceptance is also very fast, the page number is very slow, and the online hang is very late.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted for two months after the submissionTwo minor repairs in two weeks, one of which is a reviewer or editor directly to refine the manuscript, modify the grammar and expression, ask whether he accepts it, make me feel very responsible, very serious, and very grateful to the teacher who helped me to polish.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

has just been changed and published, the level of reviewers is really high.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springer.com/New+%26+ ... lt%29/journal/11434

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just received, the editor is very serious, I feel lucky, it took about three months

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Review speed is OK, 3 months, but do not receive long articles.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The difficulty of publishing is still relatively large, and the difficulty is greater than many common SCI journals abroad.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

For the scientific circular, I feel that there is no good thing, or do not go up, of course, except for the way.Because the review is more strict.

(0) Thank | Anonymous