Submitted, 16-Nov-2019; Major revision, 14-Mar-2020; A revision has been submitted, 27-Mar-2020; Minor revision, 09-May-2020; A revision has been submitted, 20-May-2020; Accept, 26-May-2020. The review speed of this journal is relatively slow. Excuse me, can those who have articles published tell me how long will it take before receiving the result of proof? There is no news after acceptance.

(4) Thank | ya

It's pretty smooth. It got accepted after the major revision, and I urged the editorial office in the middle. There was only one reviewer's opinion in 2 months. However, the editor was very responsible and immediately contacted the reviewer and sent it for review. Wish the domestic journals get better and better!

(3) Thank | speedman

2019.1, submitted; 2019.5, revised R1; 2019.7, revised R2; 2019.8, accepted.

(27) Thank | Jason89

This is a representative publication of the Chinese Ocean Society and an authoritative academic journal of the domestic marine industry. It has been included in SCI-E since 2003.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

It has now been divided into three zones, are there still any investments?

(0) Thank | King

May I ask how long you have received the proof? I haven't heard anything for six months.

(0) Thank | 梦幻大野狼

2022.01.01 Submission
2022.11.15 Minor revision
2022.12.27 Accept
2022.12.28 Awaiting Production Checklist
Having reviewed for nearly a year, it required multiple contacts with the editor, and the speed at each stage was slow, resulting in an unsatisfactory experience. I hope domestic journals can truly improve.

(0) Thank | oldbig黑手

Submission 29-Aug-2022
Major revision 03-Nov-2022
Accepted 05-Dec-2022

(0) Thank | 昨天太近6

The editor is very responsible, but the review process is really slow, very slow. It often needs to be reminded, and it is unclear when it will be published.

(0) Thank | wangke93511

Submitted for 12 months and got rejected! It shows that the requirements for AOS journals are becoming increasingly stringent. Keep working hard and continue to submit good papers!

(2) Thank | Zheng SW

Submitted in mid-November, received a minor revision and a major revision over a month later. Spent a month making changes and submitted the revised version at the end of January. After two more weeks, it was accepted in early February. The review process can be considered very fast.

(0) Thank | duts

Quite slow, submitted in early April, major revision in mid-October, re-submitted after modification in mid-November, minor revision in early December, submitted after 2 days of modification, accepted at the end of December. Took 9 months in total. It will take more than 10 months to be published.

(0) Thank | liyongxu

2021/06/26 Submission
2021/08/16 Major revision
2021/09/12 Revised manuscript returned (R1)
2021/10/10 Major revision
2021/10/28 Revised manuscript returned (R2)
2021/11/14 Accepted
The quality of the paper is average, and the research direction is physical oceanography. The entire submission process took five months, and the editors and reviewers were very responsible. The review process was also relatively fast. I wish the domestic SCI to continue to improve!

(0) Thank | chinastigers

5.6 Submission
10.13 Minor revisions
10.23 Return for revisions
11.10 Accepted

(0) Thank | TracyChen

It took nearly a year from submission to acceptance, and the review process was relatively slow with two major revisions. I feel that the overall quality of this journal is improving, and it is not as easy to have articles accepted as before. I support domestic journals that are open to the world.

(0) Thank | YuHangsong

Submitted in early August.
Received major revision comments one month later, including one minor revision and one major revision.
Received reviewer comments on October 17th.
Article accepted on November 25th.
Overall, the process was very fast. Support domestic journals in marine studies! Hope it continues to improve and prosper.

(4) Thank | cuoouc

It took one month for the submission review and three months for the manuscript review, making a total of four months. One reviewer made minor revisions, while another reviewer did not provide constructive comments and rejected the submission. The editor also rejected it. Overall, the level of the reviewers' expertise seems uneven. Additionally, the submission process was very slow.

(3) Thank | leileileia

is very fast!Give results for 3 months.After the revision,

(5) Thank | Anonymous

submitted for 4 months, but the middle of the year caught up with the New Year. Only now, I received some review comments. I don’t know if it’s good or bad. I’m worried about another review.After the comments came back, they refused to submit the manuscript.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

I think this journal has a lot of articles..In my case, I feel very sad, there are quite a few articles in it, I think, if it is in my trial, it may be sad.I have submitted this journal twice, and even the speed of review is within 24 months, and it is very bad...

(0) Thank | Anonymous