Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | BMC GENOMICS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | BMC GENOMICS | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1471-2164 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 139 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 5.80% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.springer.com/journal/12864 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/GICS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 236 GRAYS INN RD, FLOOR 6, LONDON, ENGLAND, WC1X 8HL | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 1005 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1471-2164%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 6.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 32.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on BMC GENOMICS: | Write a review |
Author: 番茄嘟嘟 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-03-08 19:30:29 This journal was really slow. I submitted for the reason that it was a time-honored journal. However, the editor was fast, it was under review directly in three days after submission. Maybe it was really difficult to find the reviewers for my article. One reviewer who had good evaluation on my article quitted during the period. Let’s briefly describe the process, hope it will be helpful to you! 2019.3.13, submission; 2019.3.15, under review; 2019.7.20, major revision; 2018.8.15, revision was submitted; 2020.1.8 major revision (the reviewer changed, I urged once per month and wanted to withdraw it, but the editor retained); 2020.1.31, revision was submitted; 2020.3.2, the comments of review were returned; 2020.3.3, under editor’s evaluation; 2020.3.4, accepted. It took nearly one year, which was really slow. However, the quality of the review was high, which improved the article a lot. Different opinions were raised, and enough arguments were found; they also thought very carefully. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 李之一同学 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-02-20 16:18:23 25 Feb 2019 submitted; 06 Jul 2019 re-submit suggested; 26 Jul 2019 revised submission; 05 Sep 2019 re-submit suggested; 27 Oct 2019 revised submission; 26 Jan 2020 Minor revision required; 3 Feb 2020 revised submission; 14 Feb 2020 Minor revision required. The format needed to be modified; 19 Feb 2020 accepted. Cheers! It took a whole year before and after, the process was very long, but the result was very satisfactory. The editors and reviewers are very nice, and their suggestions have played an important role in improving the quality of the article. The fifth paper was successfully accepted by a SCI journal, and we look forward to the good news of the sixth one. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 李春季 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-02-20 16:10:19 25 Feb 2019 submitted; 06 Jul 2019 re-submit suggested; 26 Jul 2019 revised submission; 05 Sep 2019 re-submit suggested; 27 Oct 2019 revised submission; 26 Jan 2020 Minor revision required; 3 Feb 2020 revised submission; 14 Feb 2020 Minor revision required. The format needed to be modified; 19 Feb 2020 accepted. Cheers! It took a whole year before and after, the process was very long, but the result was very satisfactory. The editors and reviewers are very nice, and their suggestions have played an important role in improving the quality of the article. The fifth paper was successfully accepted by a SCI journal, and we look forward to the good news of the sixth one. ![]() ![]() |
Author: swallow Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-11-20 18:23:04 This journal is the worst. SO SLOW. It took 7 months to receive the first round of reviews. The editor claimed that the department couldn’t find suitable reviewers for our manuscript. Despite this, we ended up going through three rounds of revision with the editor. Once our article was accepted, we heard nothing from the editor until 3.5 months later. What a process. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 707145297@qq.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-11 19:04:50 The reviewer is very responsible, reviewing the draft quickly, overhauling it, and directly hiring it after minor repairs.Still very lucky to submitted the first draft.Ha ha...Go ahead, come on!Share it together: 725554986 ![]() ![]() |
Author: 无 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-11 09:01:10 first trial for 7 months, overhaul; second trial minor repair; third trial minor repair, soon received.It lasted more than a year. ![]() ![]() |
Author: happywu Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-03-27 09:37:25 Directly speechless, it took 8 months to return directly to the first trial, and the tragic result!I selectd on August 9 last year, and I rejected it directly on March 7 this year. This journal is a pit person! ![]() ![]() |
Author: minky Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-02-07 14:14:27 Submitted in mid-October last year, received review comments in January this year, accepted after minor repairs, and now returned proof, took a total of 3 months ![]() ![]() |
Author: Z Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-01-20 09:58:48 BMC Genomics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of genome-scale analysis, functional genomics, and proteomics. ![]() ![]() |
Author: bababa Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-11-30 15:14:57 After a month, I finally sent it for review. I can only wait slowly ![]() ![]() |
Author: seven Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-10-27 16:16:06 After my overhaul, I repaired it several times and finally received it.The reviewer is more responsible. ![]() ![]() |
Author: yuting Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-09-26 21:36:19 I would like to ask after the minor repair, why after nearly a month, the article is still in the hands of the editorial department, did not give the reviewer?Excuse me, do you need to send an email to the editorial office to ask? ![]() ![]() |
Author: hyjzy Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-09-18 20:18:38 has 2 articles, and the speed of the trial is not very fast.This two-year IF is falling, I don't like it. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-05-06 16:52:19 This journal was too bad, submitted for 6 months, still in the underreview, asked the editor once in the middle, and wrote a reviewer did not return, 2 weeks promotionReview draft.I asked again in the past month. I still told him the same message as I did last time. How can I still have 2 weeks? I didn’t respond this time. ![]() ![]() |
Author: sdchang Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-12-29 11:48:41 The article was transferred from GB.The review was received shortly.It is the layout fee is a bit high. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-10-16 23:11:00 How the recent review is so slow, all in January,The article is still in the hands of the editor, and it is not sent for review. What do you mean? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-04-10 23:48:00 BMC Genomics This journal is too slow, I hope everyone is cautious, I have been two weeks, how is the status: Initial assessment??? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-02-22 17:57:00 Recently contributed another article, that is, the layout fee is relatively high!The review is less than two months, and then it will be accepted for 4-6 months. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-09-14 20:36:00 Magazine is a slower pace, just contributed an article, a full 5 months time ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-12-25 14:13:00 Journals in the field of genomics are relatively easy, especially the annual supplement(The article selected by the meeting) is very easy.In addition to supplements, articles in other issues are generally slow to review, and even after a month, manuscript numbers are given. Sometimes, before the review, you will be asked if you would like to switch to other BMC series journals (not drafts).After acceptance, it can be directly online. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-09-13 14:51:00 The review speed is slow, the language requirements are high, the image format requirements are not high, and the post-receipt is fast. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |