My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

BIOMATERIALS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design Service
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[BIOMATERIALS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 118092 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleBIOMATERIALS
Journal Title AbbreviationsBIOMATERIALS
ISSN0142-9612
E-ISSN1878-5905
h-index337
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
18.703.0691.961
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Bioengineering
Q17 / 148
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Biophysics
Q11 / 129
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Ceramics and Composites
Q12 / 106
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Mechanics of Materials
Q16 / 367
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Biomaterials
Q12 / 100

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)4.50%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30392/description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/biomat/
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyBiweekly
Year Publication Started1980
Annual Article Volume526
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0142-9612%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 3.7 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 29.58%
Data from Elsevier: 15%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 2.3 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【BIOMATERIALS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on BIOMATERIALS: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-07 16:04:00
The efficiency of this journal is commendable. The review period is only one month – highly efficient. I felt that the editor of this journal was revered in the field. Honestly, if the status had been “with the editor,” it was very likely that the editor himself was reviewing the manuscript.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: jmt


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-04 22:03:55
2018-04-19 submit to journal2018-04-20 with editor2018-05-21 under review2018-06-28 major revision necessary2018-07-17 revision submit to journal2018-07-30 with editor2018-09-04 accept
Show Review in Original Language
(39) Thank | jmt

Author: Boby


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-11 07:05:01
2018-03-15 submit to journal2018-03-23 ​​with editor2018-04-01 under review2018-04-12 under editor evaluation2018-04-18 Major revision necessary (six reviewers)2018-04-30 revision submit to journal2018-05-01 with editor2018-05-10 accept
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Boby

Author: mmm


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-12 19:54:19
...
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | mmm

Author: jiangzhenqi@nimte.ac.cn


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-02 09:51:58
2.13 Submission2.20 points edited2.27 Submitted for review3.9 Back to the editor's hand3.14 Overhaul, it is necessary to make up an experiment and change the article, and give it two weeks.3.28 repair4.2 ReceivingThe first article, used for graduation, feels good overall.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | jiangzhenqi@nimte.ac.cn

Author: tjuguoweisheng@126.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-21 17:41:41
7.2Submission to BMs, no review comments have been received for nearly 5 months, and 4 reminders have been made in the middle. There has been no substantial progress.About 10.30 became under editor evaluation, and there is still no news for one month.Also drunk.Disappointed with the BMs again.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tjuguoweisheng@126.com

Author: JNU


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-13 09:32:15
2017.3.23 Submission, (about 2017.4.3 state changed from with editor to under review)2017.5.28 Received review comments, overhaul, but not many problems2017.6.23 Return to review comments2017.7.4 Received
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | JNU

Author: 1362156559


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-10 11:02:30
Submitted for review in the past week, returned three comments in more than one month, selectd after the modification, and notified the next day to receive
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 1362156559

Author: xiaoding


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-19 22:14:53
wasting time.Never select for it.No animal test is definitely rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | xiaoding

Author: 小陈


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-07 19:41:11
The first review is for 1 month, then the draft is revised for 1 month;After submitting the manuscript for review, the manuscript will be reviewed for 1 monthSubmit the manuscript for another three weeks, accept!The whole process was too hard, and the questions answered were more than the content of the article.However, thanks to the instructor for guiding, you must have patience to answer all the comments, try not to argue.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 小陈

Author: 123sdf


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-22 17:56:20
is very fast, and less than 4 reviews are returned in less than 1 month.After the overhaul, I returned to the reviewer. After 2 weeks, I gave it to Xiao Xiu. After the minor repair, I edited it directly.The requirements are slightly higher than before, and there are many comments on the review, but the problem is not very sloppy, and it is better to answer.Reviewers may like more innovative articles and more complete articles on biological evaluation systems.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 123sdf

Author: 71529983@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-14 14:44:35
review cycle is long, lasts for three months, one accepts oneRefused, the editor refused to engage.The reviewers who refused to do so did not review them at all, and the supporting data was ignored.The complaint was fruitless and the editor said that he respected the reviewer’s decision.Transfer to Chemical Science for one and a half months.Interdisciplinary journals are afraid to encounter non-negative reviewers who are not peers.
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | 71529983@qq.com

Author: f s


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-03 19:57:46
can't tolerate that he spent a month without submitting a trial and refused to do it, and there is no reason
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | f s

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-28 12:33:00
For several years, the SCI partition has always belonged to Zone 1, and the quality is still very good.The editor has a great grasp of the article. The article I published was edited directly by the editor.The 2013 impact factor is estimated to remain at 7.6-7.8.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-19 18:25:00
The biomaterials that were submitted on August 29th, today is still with editor, why is it so slow??
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-15 21:30:00
July 22nd contribution August 12 with editor September 12 Minor Revision Necessary September 13 accept
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-07 23:16:00
has been submitted for 46 days, the first 18 daysIt is With editor, and has been in Under Review, which is not in line with Biomaterials style.The review period for Biomaterials is up to 21 days, which together with the expiration date.Feeling more fierce.The first time I was rejected, I modified it. This is the second time I selectd.It is best to be rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-29 17:58:00
I selectd for three weeks or with editor
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-12 17:29:00
?Have you selectd for 2 weeks or with editor?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-10 11:28:00
Prepare to select for an article, by the way, ask the students who have selectd, does Biomaterias journal use the recommended reviewer?What needs to be uploaded
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-05 19:14:00
is now biased towards biological characterization.In material science, most of them are not innovative, and they are very common preparation characterization.A well-known journal in the industry is also a journal.After all, there are limitations, the temporary industry boss, the future has yet to be tested.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-19 14:18:00
submitted an article last year, edited the manuscript for review, and gave me a reply in about a week, telling me that there is no scientific error, let me change some of the sentences, and make the conclusion into a paragraph, I was verySurprised, how did he actually decide not to accept a reviewer to give me a review?The first editorial comment is as follows: Dear Dr. Di,
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-18 19:26:00
feels the awareness of healthcare materials. The article is not bad, the database is also good, and it is the sister journal of advance materials, which may exceed biomaterials, biomaterials in the future.There are too many articles about the relationship.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-18 09:24:00
The second biomaterials reception, quite touched: 1) The idea is to be new enough, and it is easy to directly study the influencing factors. 2) To be clear and concise, especially with the formerThe highlight of the comparison of people's work 3) The content should be deep, the cells, the body, and more and more good
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-06 10:14:00
efficient.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [BIOMATERIALS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag



© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service