The 2025 subclass has dropped to Zone 2. Ah.

(0) Thank | Jinge Yuan

The review process is very fast, with four reviewers who each take about a week on average. The paper was accepted after three rounds of revisions.

(0) Thank | Jinge Yuan

Slow, very slow, slow but not stagnant, graduate cautiously~ cautiously~

(0) Thank | xlj

It is simply too slow! Graduates, be cautious!
This article is a study on the impact of plant-microbe interactions on host resistance, involving transcriptome and metabolome analysis.
Submission timeline:
2022.1.1 Submitted
2022.4.16 Received reviewer's comments (two reminder letters were sent in between)
2022.6.15 Revised and resubmitted (not many revisions were required, but due to a busy schedule nearing graduation, it was delayed until the last minute)
2022.8.17 Received second round of reviewer's comments (only one comment)
2022.8.18 Revised and resubmitted
2022.8.31 Accepted
This article took a total of 8 months for the review process.

(30) Thank | lulu拉拉的sci

On Jan 13, 2022, the editor finally replied to request revisions. After reviewing the questions from two reviewers, there were a total of over ten points to address. They gave me a two-month period for the revisions. It can be said that they are quite laid-back.

(0) Thank | Lvpori

May 16, 2021 - Submitted, with the editor for about a month
Dec 13, 2021 - Second reviewer responded, reminded twice in between
Dec 13, 2021 - Required reviews completed, still in this state until January 4, 2022.

(2) Thank | Lvpori

All questions must be answered point by point, do not omit any; try to meet the additional experiments suggested in the comments, provide reasonable reasons if unable to meet them; make sure to cite the literature recommended by the reviewers and discuss thoroughly; when submitting the revised manuscript, make sure to check the corrections made in the original draft

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

After reviewers have completed rating the paper, they need to write a complete review. Typically, this includes a brief summary of the paper, an evaluation of its innovative aspects, pointing out any shortcomings, and providing suggestions on how the paper should be handled by the editor

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What are the opinions and suggestions of journal editors? What are the opinions and suggestions of reviewers? What are the differences between the two?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

How to respond to reviewers' comments?

(0) Thank | 陶宜三岁啦

Under review for three months, still no news. Graduates, please do not apply.

(1) Thank | zhangzhengkun

On the rise, optimistic about the future, what do you all think?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

After one week of submission, the status has changed from "with editor" to "under review"

(0) Thank | 蚀骨易真

The review process has been very slow, and it has been under review for three months

(0) Thank | Conrad Bernal

is very slow. The submission has been under review for three months.

(1) Thank | 1

It has been almost 2 weeks since I submitted my article, and it is still with the editor. It's really slow!

(0) Thank | 一只冰琴呀

It took nearly a year and a half from submission to receiving reviewer comments, and then they only allowed 60 days for revisions. The process is very slow, so if you're a student waiting to graduate, it's best not to submit to this journal

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

It took about 10 months from submission to the online version being released, and this is what I submitted!

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

How is the speed of this magazine? Is it easy? Has anyone submitted before? Please share, thank you

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description

(3) Thank | Anonymous