In 2010, the impact factor for this journal was 4.019. Unfortunately, there is very little information on the journal website, and it looks like this journal only published two articles last year!! As expected, the review cycle is long; the editor mentioned that the reviewers have 16 weeks to reply. The number of submissions has increased recently, so hopefully the review period will become shorter.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

7.10 submitted to the journal
7.11 with editor
7.21 under review 5-6-1//
7.23 under review 7-2-9//
7.26 under review 0-7-6//
Group............................

(0) Thank | kekeshijie

7.10 submitted to the journal
7.11 with editor
7.21 under review 5-6-1
7.23 under review 7-2-9
7.26 under review 0-7-6
group
8.4 under review 5-6-1
8.8 under review 7-2-9
8.9 required reviews complete 0-7-6
8.14 required reviews complete
8.21 review complete / major revision
9.10 resubmit group
9.13 under review 5-6-1
9.15 under review 7-2-9
9.16 under review 0-7-6
9.29 accept

(0) Thank | kekeshijie

Don't be anxious to submit, it's a slow process, the first round takes about six months. After submission, it takes more than eight months to find reviewers and for the review process. The final minor revisions, one rejection, and a direct rejection. The main issue is that the reviewers are very unprofessional, very perfunctory, didn't even read through the paper, just pointed out a few formatting issues, plus one felt it wasn't innovative enough and rejected it directly. Eight months of waiting in vain

(0) Thank | scizzz

Don't give up, suffer slowly

(0) Thank | 狮吼秀敏

Any updates lately?

(0) Thank | 北国统元

Abstract mainly explains the purpose of the paper, the methods used, the results obtained, and their significance. The abstract should only include 4 or 5 of the most important points, results, or meanings

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese with titles ":" and ":" respectively, and keep the translations under 250 characters. Generally, the abstract should not exceed 5% of the full text

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How detailed should an abstract be?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

How many characters are typically recommended for an abstract?

(0) Thank | 上清雨真

Submission success rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: IF has been continuously decreasing over the past few years, I wonder why?

(0) Thank | Quincy II

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Summarize the review situation. Only papers that have been personally decided are counted. A total of 20 papers, with acceptance rate for original submission at 0%, minor revisions at 15%, major revisions at 50%, and direct rejections at 35%. Most articles require 2 rounds of revisions, and a few articles require 3-4 rounds. 30% of the articles require production editing. My principle in handling manuscripts is to use them if possible, but sometimes, due to reasons of peer review, some manuscripts have to be rejected. We hope everyone can actively submit papers, and wish you success

(0) Thank | 雅凡baby

One tip when submitting papers is to recommend good reviewers. Try to recommend several, as not all may be available. However, it can be really important at times. Also, the review time depends on the availability of peer reviewers; editors generally do not delay manuscripts. Sometimes, after seeking feedback from multiple experts, a paper may still be rejected, which can waste a lot of time. After all, all this work is purely voluntary. Performance evaluations don't matter, and academic titles are also irrelevant. The same goes for Associate editors

(0) Thank | 雅凡baby

The magazine is acceptable, with an IF of 3-4 or 4+, and an acceptance rate of around 45%. It focuses on the field of new energy, with relatively high language requirements, and must have a certain level of novelty and innovation

(0) Thank | 云来一禾

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: Submitted two weeks ago, currently under review, over a month has passed, still waiting

(0) Thank | 妙音大叔

submission for two weeks, under review, more than one monthNow, waiting for

(82) Thank | 1358615840@qq.com

The editing seems very meticulous, with only over 100 articles published in a year. If there were more articles, the impact factor should be even higher

(0) Thank | 昭巫艳蕾

Just dropped IF in the middle

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

I am an associate editor. Your submission is welcome. It is a relatived new journal, but shows a good prospect

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Submit a week after Under ReviewNo news for more than two months, continue to wait

(0) Thank | Anonymous

After one week of submission, it is under review. It has been over two months since then and there is still no news. I will continue to wait

(0) Thank | 墟散元芹

The 2012 edition includes the 3 areas of energy & fuel

(0) Thank | Conrad Bernal

2012 is the 3 zone in Energy & fuel

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Just won an article, I want to ask, which district is it now? Why can't I find it all the time, or hasn't it been indexed yet? 2013 if=4.25

(0) Thank | 魔都芸欣

just got one, I want to ask,How many districts is this now?Why haven’t you been able to find it all the time, or have you not included it?2013 IF=4.25

(0) Thank | Anonymous