7.6 stj
7.7 ur invites 4 to 2 (public number 0-2-4)
7.8 ur invites 4 to 3 (public number 0-3-4)
7.11 ur invites 4 to 3, complete 1 (public number 1-3-4)
7.14 rrc invites 4 to 3, complete 2 (public number 2-3-4)
7.15 ur invites 4 to 3, complete 2 (public number 2-3-4) rrc becomes ur, it should be AISWE期刊 requires 2, automatically enters rrc, editor considers that there is a need to wait for the third reviewer to accept the review, and then it is converted to ur. Waiting for the opinions of the third reviewer, at that time was very anxious, afraid that there would be conflicts between the opinions of the first and second reviewers, so the editor would wait for the third reviewer (don't think too much! In the subsequent revision opinions, the first two were positive opinions, the editor may be out of respect for the reviewers, after all, they decided without waiting for the opinions of the reviewers, the reviewers may feel uncomfortable)
7.20 rc invites 4 to 3, complete 3 (public number 3-3-4)
7.21 major revision three reviewers, no need for additional experiments, the questions raised are not sharp and easy to answer. Add performance comparison figures, the other two reviewers both pointed out grammar and format errors, I am suspicious that these are common comments in reviewer opinions.
7.26 revision stj that night found out that we+ur invite 3 to 1, complete 1 (public number 1-1-3)
7.27 Direct accept!!!

(0) Thank | huanghaha

Is Dip going to be rejected after the first trial?

(0) Thank | junction27

The day after submitting on April 28th, the paper was sent for review. Three reviewers were initially invited, but this number was later increased to eight. However, only two reviewers agreed to review the paper. The editor urged the reviewers to provide their feedback within a day. The responses to the reviewers' questions were sent back within two days. Three reviewers were invited for a second review, but only one agreed and accepted the paper for publication. In less than a month, the paper was published. The speed was incredibly fast, and the efficiency of the editorial department was extremely high. We hope the journal will continue to improve and return to the top tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences soon.

(0) Thank | 马优秀

Submitted on March 31st; first review completed on April 7th, with major revisions and insightful comments from all three reviewers. Revised manuscript submitted on April 28th; accepted on May 5th. Thanks to Dr. Ren, the editor-in-chief, for the prompt handling of the manuscript. Best wishes for the continued success of Materials Today Physics!

(0) Thank | liuyq

There is a high probability of rejection, and I was just rejected today.

(0) Thank | 旺仔

After submitting an article, I immediately noticed that there was no option to "DIP" with the editor.

(0) Thank | doudou fre

The submission was made on February 9, 2025, and accepted on April 6. Overall, the editing process was very fast. I hope to be promoted to a higher level soon.

(0) Thank | Min Zhao

Submitted on January 9, 2025
Reviewed on January 14, 2025
First reviewer reviewed on January 15, 2025
First reviewer completed review on January 16, 2025
Second reviewer reviewed on January 18, 2025
Second reviewer left on February 8, 2025
Editor invited third reviewer overnight on February 8, 2025
Third reviewer reviewed on February 9, 2025
Third reviewer completed review on February 21, 2025
Editor processed review comments that night (major revision) on February 21, 2025
Revised response to review comments on February 23, 2025
All reviewers responded on March 2, 2025
Editor processed on March 2, 2025
Accepted at 1:00 AM on March 3, 2025
Proofreading on March 4, 2025
The editor is very efficient and friendly, so I suggest everyone submit their work.

(0) Thank | 123

What are the results? Will the application be directly rejected or decided to be reviewed?

(0) Thank | BINGOSIX

Thanks to the good guidance of my postdoctoral supervisor.

(0) Thank | 小白001

Little White is so amazing to have accepted so quickly!

(0) Thank | shimin_7

Little Bai is so talented to catch on so quickly.

(0) Thank | shimin_7

The time was mistaken, the submission deadline is December 31, 2024.

(0) Thank | 小白001

Submission deadline: December 31, 2023;
Sent for review to two reviewers on January 15, 2025;
Revised and submitted on February 14, 2025;
Accepted on February 17, 2023;
The journal has a particularly fast processing efficiency, it's a good journal, hopefully its Impact Factor will increase soon.

(0) Thank | 小白001

The editing process was quick, and the reviewers' comments were very targeted and fair. Although the reviewers questioned whether our experimental results were due to component errors, they also provided an opportunity for major revisions. After responding promptly, our paper was quickly accepted. Overall, the submission experience was great!

(0) Thank | zzzZzZit

The overall speed of MTP is very fast, with the submission to acceptance taking just over a month. The suggestions from the two reviewers were also very insightful, and the paper was published immediately after acceptance.

Timeline:
10.22 Submit
10.27 Under Review
11.13 Major Revision
11.24 Resubmit
12.05 Accept

(0) Thank | Ushuaia

How did it turn out in the end, were you rejected?

(0) Thank | Lity

Did it become Dip after submitting directly with the editor, or did it become Dip after submitting 15 directly and then 16 becoming Dip?

(0) Thank | Lity

No, you can see the progress by registering an account with the submission mailbox.

(0) Thank | greedyboy

I want to ask, is it only through communication that I can check the progress? My supervisor submitted it for me today, but I haven't received the password. What should I do to check the progress? Can you please reply to me? Do I need to register myself?

(0) Thank | hyj

I want to ask, is it only through communication that progress can be checked? My supervisor submitted it for me today, but I haven't received the password. What's going on and how can I check the progress? Can you please reply?

(0) Thank | hyj

I want to ask, is it only through communication that I can check the progress? My supervisor submitted it for me today, but I haven't received the PASSWORD. What's going on?

(0) Thank | hyj

I didn't understand what the person upstairs was saying. I work in flexible electronics.

(0) Thank | greedyboy

Can you bring the up? Do we need to include additional documents?

(0) Thank | Fear-Jun-dreams

Received the review comments on 5.31, with two reviewers suggesting major revisions within one month. Responded to the review comments on 6.26, and the paper was accepted on 6.28. Grateful for the editors and reviewers.

(0) Thank | greedyboy