The reviewers for this journal are extremely critical and it is time-consuming to address their comments. Honestly, not sure if I’m for up it again, although their reviews did strengthen my paper.

(0) Thank | Taban

The reviewer is very serious

(0) Thank | 沐鑫守卫

Contrary to the structure of the introduction and conclusion in the discussion section, it takes a funnel shape from small to large, gradually expanding. Starting from the rationality of each research result, anomalies, and the principles behind them, slowly analyze in depth. After laying the foundation, the main conclusion of the paper can be naturally introduced for discussion, followed by further analysis to point out the importance/significance/universality/application value of the research

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

There is no fixed requirement for paragraphing in this discussion. Please write according to your actual situation

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How many paragraphs are usually used in a discussion?

(0) Thank | 龙鳞孝礼

What is the difference between an introduction and a discussion?

(0) Thank | 平原文波

I don't know if there is hope to enter a top journal this year. The reviewers selected by this journal are very meticulous, and they ask all questions very carefully

(0) Thank | 藤原振营

The past was great, but the current drastic fall is quite frightening. I hope to return to a 3-point level next year, but it may be too difficult

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁