Personally, I think this journal is more biased towards biological materials and biochemistry. At first it was a comprehensive journal, and later it was mainly in the field of chemistry, but now it seemed to be concentrated in the field of biological derivation. I feel that the articles in this journal are not in line with his official scope and positioning. In addition, the influence of this journal was said to be comparable to that of Nat. Chem. or JACS at the beginning. Now I feel that the influence is still far smaller, and it is relatively less popular (maybe the published field is relatively narrow). The above is my personal opinion. Maybe I mainly concerned with the fields of catalysis and physical chemistry, but I basically did not see the breakthrough results published in this journal.

(45) Thank | unni

The speed is quite fast, and the reviewer comments are super professional. I feel that this journal can be famous in the chemistry field.

(6) Thank | zhangyi

This journal is very unusual. The ideas you publish with the journal must be very current.

(0) Thank | wdhappy8665586@163.com

May I see the status of peer review, please?

(0) Thank | ocean萌萌

Submission will be reviewed within 15 days, feedback will be given within 45 days. One positive and one negative review. Editor may reject the submission

(1) Thank | CocuLiu

Excuse me, is there any notification after submission? Can it be checked on the website? I saw a comment saying that it has always been assigned to an associate editor.

(0) Thank | 33mia

It has been over two months from submission to reception.

(0) Thank | 德华学友

May I ask how long it took for your article to be accepted from submission? It's been 60 days since I submitted one for the first review, but I haven't received any updates yet.

(0) Thank | 梦回天明

It still feels necessary to have a certain amount of workload. The reviewers' demand for explanations of the mechanism should be stricter. It is quite satisfying to receive the additional requirements for characterization.

(1) Thank | 德华学友

As a completely open-source journal, it is surprising that they do not charge any publication fees. They definitely deserve praise! Although there is still a gap between their current level and the original positioning of a prestigious national conference, there is still great potential for an increase in impact factor.

(9) Thank | 11

After submission, no editor was assigned (possibly the editor-in-chief reviewed it). After 20 days, it was mentioned that the content is logical, but the senior editorial board feels that the audience is not wide enough. They suggested transferring it to four other subsidiary journals, and I chose to transfer it to ACS applied materials & interfaces. Currently awaiting the outcome.

(4) Thank | Rayon

Voted two articles, one co-author and one work, all of which have been accepted.It is easier to look at now than PNAS and Nature Comm.Bull school cattle groups, as well as interdisciplinary, new ideas articles are easier to receive.There are very few articles in each issue, so it is easy to control the quality and there is a lot of room for growth in the future.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

It is the big cow that can be sent on it. As the ACS flagship journal has great growth potential, I am going to send a few articles now, otherwise it will be very difficult in the future.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Absolutely cattle, watch it

(1) Thank | Anonymous