My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

IEEE Access

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[IEEE Access]Hello, you are Visitor Number 238293 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleIEEE Access
Journal Title AbbreviationsIEEE ACCESS
ISSN2169-3536
h-index56
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
3.900.7751.734
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q2155 / 460
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Engineering
Q147 / 299
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Computer Science
Q145 / 221

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)35.10%
Official Websitehttps://ieeeaccess.ieee.org/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ieee-access
Open AccessYes
Publisher
Subject AreaCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume14985
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2169-3536%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors:
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【IEEE Access】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/16)
  Reviews on IEEE Access: Write a review
Author: wyq_em@163.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-02 10:08:43
2017.11.3 submitted, 11.22 assigned associate editor, 12.18 received Decision, rejection and re-submit. Four reviewers, the first three suggested re-submission after revision, and the last reviewer suggested rejection. Revised the paper according to the comments (major revision, the third reviewer asked to redesign the experiment), and wrote the Cover Letter and Response Letter. 12.27 re-submitted, 2018.1.15 assigned associate editor, and 1.22 received the acceptance notice. Afterwards submitted the final draft and paid the fee on Jan. 25, published by Early Access on Jan. 29. Based on these two submission experiences, overall the cycle is stable except for the step of assigning the associate editor, which was slow. I feel that overall it not difficult to publish in Access, although the impact factor is very high. However, the journal is not highly recognized in the field (very few papers from Access have made great contributions to the field, and people don’t cite papers from Access). Therefore, if you are interested in doing long-term scientific research, aim at the top journals.

(36) Thank | wyq_em@163.com

Author: 哈哈哈哈哈


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-25 13:38:49
Review time is getting longer!The difficulty increased a lot
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 哈哈哈哈哈

Author: 躺在麦堆上看星空


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-19 19:50:47
Reply to the 384th floor: If the two opinions are not duplicated, they should be answered. It is recommended to number each reviewer's question one by one.Answer one by one, don't miss any of the comments of any reviewer.good luck!Such as:Responses to reviewer 1:Comment 1: ...Response:...Comment 2: ...Response:...Responses to reviewer 2:...
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 躺在麦堆上看星空

Author: yy511


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-18 00:06:19
Please ask the big cow here, and submit a reply email:The comment of each review is written in the email. Each review comment is a paragraph, saying that the results should be compared.The key is that the mail is also accompanied by a separate file named comment, which is directly a very specific issue.Have you ever encountered this situation?Is this document named comment a specific question for the reviewer?If this is the case, I should modify it by referring to the file named comment.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yy511

Author: 躺在麦堆上看星空


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-14 22:20:47
2018.11.7Submission2018.11.14 Assignment AE2018.12.2 The results of the first trial, four reviewers, two receipts and two rejections, AE gave a re-request for the rejection of the draft, looked at it, the reviewer is very responsible, the comments are very professional, also mentioned the idea, a total ofThe 14 opinions are mostly better, and 4 or 5 are more difficult to change. One of them requires an experiment. Because the experiment itself is time consuming and there is something delay after this, the change is slower, only 50 days later.Re-enter2019.1.21 re-submitment2019.1.29 Assign AE2019.2.2 Notification reception, two reviewers in the second instance (should be the two rejected in the first instance), all indicated that their concerns have been better responded and improved, and there is no new opinion this time.The author has also reviewed an article for the journal. The AE email said that if the invitation for review is accepted, it must return the review comments within 7 days. It seems that the manuscript processing process of the journal is still very fast.Another: If you give a rejection in the first instance
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | 躺在麦堆上看星空

Author: 转头棒棒棒


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-11 05:39:57
01-17-2019, contribution;02-10-2019, received the review comments.The first trial was very fast and there were a total of six reviewers....3 minor repairs, 2 overhauls, 1 rejection, and the editor gave the revised re-attend.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 转头棒棒棒

Author: 奔跑的大棉裤


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-01 16:15:04
3 rounds modification 5 months or so Computer-software2018.7.19 The first submission, 2018.9.30, overhaul, re-projected, 4 reviewers, 2 minor repairs, 2 major repairs, editorial overhaul2018 10 27 Back, 2018 11 16 Back Minor 4 Reviewer 3 Minor 1 Overhaul Edit Minor2018 11 24 Back to 2018 12 20 Hiring
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 奔跑的大棉裤

Author: Avada Kedavra


Subject Area: Social Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-28 15:56:08
Share it wow.Not so good, the reviewers are also very professional, and the feedback is very targeted.2018.12.26 submit2019.01.02 reject but encourage resubmit (one accept, one reject)2019.01.16 resubmit2019.1.28 accept without any changesThe first paper is still very exciting, I hope that it will get better and better in the future.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Avada Kedavra

Author: 一个来自反转的钟


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-27 11:29:28
I have been looking forward to it for a long time. I selectd for it in June last year. It may be difficult for the computer major and the communication profession to select for the IEEE. I don’t feel how fast it is. I refused to submit the manuscript directly after 4 months.The manuscript gave more than 40 opinions, and should have met the insiders and directly hit the key.Although I admire the theoretical foundation of the reviewer, but the result is rejected, my heart is still very difficult.It was revised for one month, resubmitted, returned after 1 month, returned after 10 days, and accepted after 1 month, lasting about 7 months.2018.6.4 First submission2018.10.11 rejection, overhaul2018.11.3 Back2018.12.14 Rework2018.12.21 Back2019.1.19 acceptThe twists and turns of the submission process.The reviewers are different, the disciplines are different, and the speed may be different.experience:Reflecting the workloadProper innovationDerivation cannot be wrongFull experimentHave time to focus on the next format
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 一个来自反转的钟

Author: 蓝小胖


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-25 16:19:00
The first delivery was directly rejected, re-written an article submission, delivered in early December, returned on December 30, two reviewers, an accpet, a revise, editorIt is recommended to re-submit after the modification. After the modification in the afternoon, I will return. After one week, I will receive the acceptance notice. After uploading the revised manuscript, I will pay the fee. Because I chose the wire transfer, I can’t get it. I don’t stop contacting the editorial department. The editor is very nice, non-stop.Consolation, I showed the payment after two weeks, and notified me after a week that the access was in IEEE xplore. The 1.25 notification was officially published in the ieee xplore publish. Overall, it was very fast, but after the promotion to the 2nd district, it really required the article innovation.It is best to modify the format in advance to give the editor a good impression.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 蓝小胖

Author: stephcurrrrry


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-23 10:46:38
Exactly said that the submission period is 4.5 months, the review is more strict, 2 rounds of revision, record:2018 9.6 contribution, 10.27 first rework (opinion 6 pages, 4 reviewers, 2 collections, 2 rejections, 1 overhaul, 1 revision)
 2018 11.13 resubmit, 2019 12.18 return (3 reviewers, 2 repairs, 1 collection, review comments 4 pages)2018 12.29 Submission 2019 1.8 ReceivingCompared with IEEE TRANS ON VT, IEEE TRANS is more serious in recent years, so the price is currently higher.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | stephcurrrrry

Author: Cyndiwang


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-22 21:44:05
does not feel ieee access good2018/10/14 first submission, 2018/11/19 return results, two reject one acceptThe second submission of 2018/11/28, returning results on 2018/1/17, two accepts a rejectFortunately, I gave me a third chance to respond, but it is enough to see the reviewer is very strict, I hope that the third reply can be passed.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Cyndiwang

Author: 天天中论文


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-15 19:20:40
Record it12.05 submit12.22 reject (both are reject and encouraged resubmit)12.28 resubmit1.15 accept (both are accept)
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 天天中论文

Author: 两个学报的英文本


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-10 11:53:35
12.16 submit12.28 reject, recommended re-injection (both reviewers gave accept)12.30 resubmit1.4 accept1.9 early access
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | 两个学报的英文本

Author: TJXB


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-09 10:19:47
15-Nov-2018 contribution, 14-Dec-2018 returned for modification, 24-Dec-2018 re-entry, 06-Jan-2019 accepted.The processing speed of the article is very good, I hope that the journal will be better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | TJXB

Author: nyannko


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-29 14:57:18
Look at the people below who say that they selectd well. They also tried it during the summer vacation. The first trial two accept a reject.The second trial of an accept a reject was directly rejected...
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | nyannko

Author: Jun_Pro


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-23 17:56:05
Tragedy, submissions are too disgusting reviewers.A total of three, two accepted, one rejected, the editor made a re-submitment, the second one rejected the manuscript, the result was rejected, not allowed to re-submitted
Show Review in Original Language
(26) Thank | Jun_Pro

Author: 独自莫凭栏


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-23 12:17:34
9.12 Submission10.30 Give Rework Suggestions Two Reviewers11.28 Submission of the second trial12.21 Recruitment Reviewers did not submit new commentsThis is the second article published in ACCESS. In the past two years, ACCESS has progressed at a visible speed. I wish the journals will be better and better. Everyone will submit a smooth
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 独自莫凭栏

Author: 副叫兽


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-20 21:48:39
The first round of review was 56 days.Two reviewers, one minor repair, one acceptd.The editor makes the replay after the modification.The second round of review was up to 36 days.The previous two reviewers should have nothing to do, and they added a reviewer and asked a bunch of opinions.The third round of review has been 36 days.Still no results.I feel that the editors I met are not willing to let go of our articles, so not only do I add a new reviewer every time, but I don’t worry, I will slowly invite them one by one, and wait for the reviewer to reply...
Show Review in Original Language
(22) Thank | 副叫兽

Author: d调的果味儿


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-15 10:53:25
11.01, contribution;11.06, ADM;11.08, AE;11.22, 1 minor repair, 2 major repairs, reject;11.30, re-submitted after modification;12.09, 2 after the minor repair;12.11, submit the paper and pay the fee;Processing is still very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | d调的果味儿

Author: 小巴科研


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-11 08:46:45
Congratulations to IEEE access this year, the second class of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the last one of the second district, is the limit!
Show Review in Original Language
(172) Thank | 小巴科研

Author: 博士倫


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-06 11:18:20
firstSub-submission 4/12, 5/3 notice re-submitment, because the author field of the submit form only fills in the other authors.So everyone should be careful in this step, don't make mistakes.The second submission of 5/4, 6/6 returns the notice to the revised re-attend, 2 accept 1 update and resubmit.The third submission 10/11, 12/5 returned to accept.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 博士倫

Author: 李勤奋


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-29 09:45:58
The review speed was very fast. The AE and ADM were assigned on the second day of submission, and the acceptance message was received from October 12th to November 29th.The reviewer's opinion is very positive, so it was directly acceptd, and only a few minor modifications were needed.This article was originally submitted to another SCI journal. After undergoing major repairs, revisions and additions to a lot of content and experiments, it was rejected by the editor because it did not meet the requirements of the journal field. It was understandable that it was directly accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 李勤奋

Author: zxmmm


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-22 19:36:02
I was so excited to receive the results...8.16 submission,10.5 The first review came back, the three reviewers refused, and suggested to re-submit after the revision. The opinions were quite pertinent. After careful revision, 10.23 re-submitment11.20 Come back, two reviewers, one for one rejection, ae decided to accept!The speed is really conscience, plus the middle of the modification process lasted for three months.This journal has a high level of English proficiency and must reflect the workload and experimental content.Efforts will be rewarded, I hope everyone will have good results!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | zxmmm

Author: 风雪星月夜


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-18 12:19:03
Recruitment after re-submitment~ first trial, assign AE a week for a total of 20 days, 4 reviewers, 3 accepts, 1 reject, AE request re-request after modification;Re-submitment in the next day, the same AE is assigned in a week, a total of 23 days, 3 reviewers, all accept, no comments, AE accept ~ ~ from the record to the record, a total of 45 days ~ ~ difficulty and subject professional, speed andReviewer related ~~
Show Review in Original Language
(18) Thank | 风雪星月夜

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/16)

Start your review of [IEEE Access]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2020  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service