Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

PLoS One

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[PLoS One]Hello, you are Visitor Number 429490 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePLoS One
Journal Title AbbreviationsPLOS ONE
ISSN1932-6203
Impact Factor (2017-2018)2.766
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.plosone.org/home.action
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/default.asp
Open AccessYes
PublisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, USA, CA, 94107
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume20328
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1932-6203%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PLoS One】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)
  Reviews on PLoS One: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-10 20:59:00
No matter how many papers are sent by PLOS ONE, the first thing that can be affirmed is that it is absolutely not like some rubbish papers in some domestic conferences, reviewers and editors.The quality of the paper is still strictly controlled.As for some people who think that there is more irrigation, some people think that the quality of the article is very high, and it is understandable. After all, the level of each person is different.Another point is that we can guarantee that we don't go to SCI magazine to water it!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-10 20:37:00
Up to now, 21626 articles have a layout fee of 21626*$1280=$27681280, which is equivalent to RMB 200 million. I don’t know how much I contributed to Greater China....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-03 21:59:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-21 20:34:00
No.8 submitted on the 8th, and later found that the picture was not qualified, rebuilt, officially submitted on the 12th, thanks to the reminder of the previous bug, the ethical review is very important, so after the submission, the editor will be successful.But my with editor process is also very long, has been in mid-October, looked at it, or with editor, but did not remind, just think about it, the result arrived on October 30, directly received mail, minor revision, 2 reviewers, 4 suggestions per person, a total of 8 articles, 4 of which are about the symbols in the picture, the numbers in the table, and the ABC used to explain the picture should be consistent with the article (the article usesAbc), the other 3 are about normal in introductio
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-24 13:35:00
, now the speed of this journal is not as fast as before, I have also been to the letter, saying that it is for a faster review, in the choice of trialIt will take some time for the manuscript.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-23 23:11:00
voted for a month or is the editor invited?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-12 20:30:00
Reviewer must be on the top, specifically to find the mailbox!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-07 22:31:00
The first article, submitted on April 26, 2012, "minior revision" on June 3, three experts put forward a lot of opinions, but they are more pertinent.Since I was not in a hurry to write an article, I just went to Jiadong to play in the summer vacation. I submitted the revised version 3 days before the deadline requested by the magazine. I didn’t expect to receive the “accept” email on the third day. The article was accepted smoothly. At the end of August.Has been published.The second article was submitted on July 6th, and on August 18th, “major revision”, or three experts, put forward a lot of opinions, especially the experts in statistics, and made 15 comments. Submitted on September 20th.After receiving the second revision opinion "minior revision" on October 3rd
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-27 14:17:00
, the submission was rejected for one month, and my article was not biologically motivated.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-24 10:16:00
After three days of investing, I immediately became an under review. I waited for the result.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-22 23:02:00
has been submitted for 2 months, 1 month passed.Technical review, 1 month has been the editor invited... depressed, today is finally with the editor.....September 28th: ​​Finally, it is UNDER REVIEW, and wait for news.....December 3rd: The three reviewers are all minor repairs. The editor's opinion is Xiao Xiu. The editor will remind you: In the case of Xiao Xiu, it is recommended to repair it within 4-5 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-22 22:21:00
Reviewing is faster, the article has been accepted, but has been modified many times!Feeling reviewers and editors are very responsible.Publishing editors are very demanding!!!!For our direction, the impact factor is very high, very good!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-05 08:00:00
is not SCI, see the official website authority http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/ just checked the results
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-27 16:04:00
looks like PLOS ONE in 2012SCI was removed from the year!!!!!!Http://www.sci-thomsonreuters.org/
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-17 21:45:00
It is recommended not to vote for this magazine in the future. The irrigation in one year is too big. We may not calculate this magazine when we are in the assessment.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-04 08:41:00
The recruitment rate is less than 100%, and it is impossible to be so high. The review of plos one is still very strict.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-21 16:24:00
It would be much better if you don’t charge!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-21 12:27:00
My boss is also very contemptuous of this magazine, he said that many big names now look down on this magazine.The article is very watery.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-19 17:25:00
A good journal, the review speed is fast, but a bit expensive: the publication fee is US$1350.The research on biomaterials and cell behavior, the methods and drugs I use are relatively new.After submitting the manuscript at the end of March 2012, I returned to the revised opinion after 3 weeks. Both reviewers said that my results were very interesting, the writing level and logic were good, but they all said that there was no mechanism understanding, and the editor gave me a major overhaul.With reference to the review comments, I carefully carried out supplementary experimental verification and consulted the literature for mechanism analysis.The revised manuscript was sent back to retrial, and one month later today (June 18), the article was received directly.Feeling to answer the reviewer's review comments
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-30 15:37:00
A paper on the purification, properties and application of fungal proteins, the workload is very substantial, the results are small and innovative, and the language has been modified on foreign websites.BT was rejected, AEM was rejected, and the reason was somewhat far-fetched.The boss is keen on the reputation of the factors and magazines and insists on going to high investment.After plos one, he was trained to receive it, less than two months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-26 07:03:00
3Submission No.19, on April 25th, the two review comments were returned, and the results of the review were all good. The editor's opinion was “minor revision”, which is under minor repair. Overall, theThe review speed of the magazine is still very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-11 13:55:00
issued an article at the beginning of the year. The process of summarizing plos one is: October 20, 2011, 21, Editor Invited, 25, under review,November 23, Required Reviews Completed, 25th overhaul decision, submitted revised version on December 15th, accepted on January 2nd, 2012, reviewer recommended 3, but may only be used for one, editor recommended 1However, I didn't use him. I used to have two IF6 or so. I voted because I was preparing a doctoral thesis, so I wrote a shorter one. When I discussed it with my boss, I thought it might be possible to vote for IF>5, but the boss thinks PLoSOne is also a good magazine,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-26 13:06:00
PLos one's review speed is still very fast, the first trial is almost one and a half months, two reviewers, one medium repair, one minor repair, no need to supplement the experiment.People are recommending themselves and feel at least one reviewerIt was recommended by us. After half a month of revision, I went back and received it in two weeks. After one month, I saw it very quickly. The paper was purely bioinformatics. Without experimentation, BMC Plant Bilogy was directly rejected.I voted for PLOS ONE. I feel that this magazine prefers bioinformatics papers. The level of reviewers is still very high, and the impact factor will remain at this level. The magazine is good
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-23 09:14:00
Tiantou, today sent me the article number, and I look forward to having a good result.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-21 15:39:00
1 Month cast, overhaul, is being revised.....good and bad, too tortured.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)

Start your review of [PLoS One]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.