Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

PLoS One

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[PLoS One]Hello, you are Visitor Number 429489 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePLoS One
Journal Title AbbreviationsPLOS ONE
ISSN1932-6203
Impact Factor (2017-2018)2.766
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.plosone.org/home.action
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/default.asp
Open AccessYes
PublisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, USA, CA, 94107
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume20328
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1932-6203%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PLoS One】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)
  Reviews on PLoS One: Write a review
Author: wyuwpp@126.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-09-05 05:41:13
15Submission on July 19th, with editor and under review within one week.It took nearly a month to review the manuscript, and on August 15th received the review comments, two reviewers, one of which recommended a theoretical experiment to verify, overhaul opinions; another reviewer Xiao Xiu received, mainly for certain issuesMade a simple explanation.It took a few days to replenish the experiment and repair the manuscript. It was repaired on August 31. On the same day, it was with editor. After three days, it directly became decision in process. On the fourth day, it was received directly, less than two months before and after.The editing efficiency is quite high, and the reviewer's opinions are also very pertinent. The opinions put forward are very entangled at the beginning, but after the completion of the supplement, I feel that the quality of the article is much improved, more systematic and more comprehensive.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | wyuwpp@126.com

Author: Felix888


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-08-06 12:30:49
PLOS ONE This junk journal is not generally slow. It has been submitted for 2 months. The editor still didn't submit the review. When I got fired, I sent it out.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | Felix888

Author: science


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-07-30 11:35:58
The impact factor has dropped for several years and may rise next year
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | science

Author: 110


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-11-24 08:56:07
Very fast, 2 months to give advice, repaired for one month, modified after receiving, half-month online publication.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 110

Author: 查理


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-11-23 12:36:39
The journal editor is very professional, careful. The response speed is fast. And the layout fee can be reduced.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 查理

Author: YY


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-11-10 15:42:29
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | YY

Author: plant


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-10-18 16:57:04
this journal is more controversial, butOverall, PLOS ONE also has more good articles published.Our group recently published an article.The second revision requires a change in the language, and the American experts at LetPub have helped us a lot.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | plant

Author: kucaicai


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-10-03 10:10:42
recording speed is very fast, repaired twice
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | kucaicai

Author: xiao


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-09-06 06:32:21
Since the purpose of PLOS one is different from other journals, the importance of the paper is no longer evaluated before publication, but is accepted by peers after publication, providing an opportunity for extensive exchanges..Then, there may be some articles with low academic value in the journal.Therefore, the Chinese do not want to use PLOS one to brag about how high the impact factor of their articles is, which is contrary to the purpose of the journal.There are still some good articles on it, but the layout fee is too high, which is difficult for general scholars to bear.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | xiao

Author: zhaoqm123


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-03-24 18:43:44
Reviewing speed is faster.But it is said that it is getting slower and slower now, and there may be too many manuscripts.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | zhaoqm123

Author: zhni2013


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-12-11 16:28:44
This journal has always been good, it is a bit expensive to pay money
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | zhni2013

Author: sicence1


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-12-01 23:16:50
It’s Christmas, this journal is more than everReply a little slower
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | sicence1

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-29 00:40:00
good journals I publishedThe reviewer of a disease-ecological model article is very professional and the comments made by the manuscript are very serious, which greatly improves the quality of the article
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-28 16:26:00
If you publish two plos one, u will never finda job^^ There are a lot of articles that don't go down...
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-19 09:53:00
I didn't think I joined the PLOS ONE team...
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-18 18:05:00
Doing this in bioinformatics is not as fast as the journal in the computer field!!!The reviewer is more professional.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-07 15:15:00
10 The 20-month draft, the current state of Editor Invited, has been for more than half a month.Newcomers to English submissions, do not know what this state means?Can anyone tell me what state changes will follow?
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-29 14:11:00
Editor Invited has been in the state for more than half a month~攒攒人品, hurry up~~~ Even drop a god~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-29 11:01:00
I voted with the colleague, the article we feel more water, want to try luck, the results returned a month or so, an editor, two reviewers, a full three pages, all the questions are very professional and demanding, there areThe problem is directly fatal, and the article was directly changed to other magazines.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-27 16:03:00
is very unpleasant.All along, everyone else is plos one. The speed is super fast. I resolutely gave up other TOP magazines and chose to submit plos one, just to make it faster.As a result, the submission was given 5 days later, the editor was invited for 18 days, and then with the editor is still 9 days!This rhythm is also called fast!!?I haven’t sent an external trial until now, is this speed??If the external trial has been dragged on for a long time, it can be understood. It is only this month that I have not sent out the external trial. I really cannot understand it..I am really disappointed with this magazine.Before the vote, there were teachers and classmates who advised me not to vote for this...I really regret it now.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-08 12:53:00
The calendar is close to four months
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-19 19:04:00
The review speed is very fast, the reviewer is more serious and compares NICE
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-14 16:35:00
4On the 16th of the month, I voted out, about half a month later, under review, it was almost 4 months, and there was no news. I was really anxious. Anyone who voted for me was fierce or Jiduo
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-12 14:26:00
I just dropped an article yesterday and joined the ranks of plos one. I am looking forward to good luck~~~~8.29 Supplement: 8.11 day submission, 15th to manuscript number, 19th with editor, until now this stateFor the delay, I will not give me a review~~~急啊~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-10 17:15:00
Garbage data collection station, the rejected magazines have no place to vote, the acceptance rate of this standard is 75%, official website introduction
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)

Start your review of [PLoS One]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.