Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

PLoS One

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[PLoS One]Hello, you are Visitor Number 432151 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePLoS One
Journal Title AbbreviationsPLOS ONE
ISSN1932-6203
Impact Factor (2017-2018)2.766
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.plosone.org/home.action
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/default.asp
Open AccessYes
PublisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, USA, CA, 94107
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume20328
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1932-6203%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PLoS One】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)
  Reviews on PLoS One: Write a review
Author: yuanyue284@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-04 18:53:57
7 submitted at the end of the month, revised in mid-September, revised for one and a half months, accepted in early December.Still very fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yuanyue284@163.com

Author: 1234


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-04 16:29:13
The whole process is more than 6 months, overhauled once, minor repairs, and happy to receive.The original 9-point nucleic acid study was originally planned. People said that the methodology was too special and could not be examined.Later, he voted for plos computer, and people said that the expert library experts did not have plos one more. They had to vote for this. There are suitable experts, and the reviewers are very professional.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 1234

Author: 41056009@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-04 13:57:21
I also talk about this journal.Submitted on February 2nd.I got a major repair in late June.The first trial was nearly five months.The two reviewers can say that the responsible person has to do not want to, 60 questions, big and small.Response to Reviewers wrote 20 pages, and the manuscript has been basically changed beyond recognition.After overhauling for three months, it became a minor repair, and there were ten problems in minor repairs.The reviewers basically agreed to make serious changes, and the articles were greatly improved.The editor gave the minor repair and indicated that the revision could not be read by the reviewer.Finally relieved.Received half a month after minor repairs.It lasted for 9 months.Let me talk about this publication. I don't say how good it is or how bad it is.It is true that this publication is not very demanding on innovation, so everyone said that he is a good mix of water journals. It is mainly to make clear the whole idea of ​​scientific research.But I just want to say that the reviewers of this journal are indeed very bullish, and it is really difficult to meet the insiders and want to mix them.I met the two reviewers. I just asked the papers all the best, and I didn't have the possibility to get away with it. I made a lot of suggestions.In addition, for each analysis process of the data, the detailed operation of the data behind each graph must take a screenshot of each process, even if it is a software operation, not just the problem of the original data.I feel that after they reviewed the manuscript, my article sent a score of about 2 points and no problem.Thanks to the reviewers, thank you for their hard work.
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | 41056009@qq.com

Author: 朗格里格拉


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-04 02:01:03
This journal is rubbish, water magazine.Whoever casts is not to cherish his academic reputation, in order to send papers to send papers
Show Review in Original Language
(20) Thank | 朗格里格拉

Author: 查尔莫斯


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-03 09:45:26
I don't know why, my review period is a little over a five-month notice overhaul, compare and break
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 查尔莫斯

Author: 11


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-02 23:52:42
is faster and easier.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 11

Author: 934001560@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-24 16:36:48
is faster and the editor is very responsible.Too much water?Personally feel that it is more rigorous
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 934001560@qq.com

Author: 管理小菜


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-27 16:16:26
This journal has become more and more strict.The paper was co-operated with the external director. The result was two major overhauls and one minor repair.The first submission to return to the overhaul is 2 and a half months. It is one and a half months to return to the revision and return to the overhaul. The third time to return to the minor repair is 1 month. Finally, the return is modified to receive one month. After receiving and editing, it is edited.Two format changes were sent.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 管理小菜

Author: 计生科


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-22 14:08:46
PLoS one can't change the 7-year continuous decline.Now the impact factor has fallen below 3 points, but once it breaks 3 points, it is a watershed and will fall sharply in the future.Because of the 3 points or less, the quality of the manuscript will be seriously degraded. There will be a lot of retraction.And some units have clearly banned PLOS ONE in terms of job title, project review, and rewards.Sci Rep dropped from 5.2 to 4.2, and this trend is basically 3 points or more next year.This is the next PLOS ONE.
Show Review in Original Language
(28) Thank | 计生科

Author: hunanyan@aliyun.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-25 10:29:11
would like to ask, submitted for 2 weeks, or editor invited, normal?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | hunanyan@aliyun.com

Author: sszs@sina.cn


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-21 12:05:22
This is not easy now, the impact factor is relatively high, the proportion of Chinese is only 24%.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | sszs@sina.cn

Author: luckyzcx


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-19 16:06:00
has been overhauled for more than a month, then minor repairs, from posting to publication for 140 days. The editor is very responsible and quite professional.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | luckyzcx

Author: meng


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-04 03:16:54
remember where I saw the comment about plos one before, saying that there is an article in my life,It’s stinking when you voted more, and you agree!!
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | meng

Author: cykk


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-28 10:59:22
There may be less than 3 points next year
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | cykk

Author: 627395814@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-27 09:03:14
has been cast for more than one month, or under review
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 627395814@qq.com

Author: wxd123


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-26 14:49:30
voted for more than 1 month, or uner review
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | wxd123

Author: bigantbrl@hotmail.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-16 09:52:24
Overall, it was still very smooth, submitted on June 17th, and the reviewer returned to the major revision evaluation on July 16th. There are some good suggestions, and the change will be completed on August 5th.Voted, the 10th was received.From the trial to the formal acceptance of the entire process for nearly 2 months.Although the Chinese people are confused about their magazines, they believe that the so-called good magazines also have low-value articles. As a strictly prohibited researcher, you should not wear colored glasses on magazines. Every article should be the best for yourself.The degree, if it is worth to publish, the results that are unbelievable and the experiments that cannot be repeated are sent to magazines that no one is watching. It is also shameful for science.Therefore, it is not necessary to entangle this. This is a water publication, and it is only a matter of one or two years.
Show Review in Original Language
(21) Thank | bigantbrl@hotmail.com

Author: gtt


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-28 13:37:22
Ready to vote for this, who told me how much the next page fee?
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | gtt

Author: pppaaa


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-07 11:08:35
is indeed water magazine, good mix
Show Review in Original Language
(62) Thank | pppaaa

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-18 21:20:08
said that after the water magazine voted for it, it was only after 3 months of review that the reviewer encountered 2 big peers and 1 small peer opinion gave 46 big repairs 2 times but the journalsThe processing speed is really not very fast. It is not like other journals who have returned to the editors for a half-month to return to the reviewers. There is no news. However, the amount of documents is so large that it is stable to the 3rd district.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 匿名

Author: ADU


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-04 16:42:19
Long time, the journal's tolerance is strong, there are scruples when investing, but after all, it's fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ADU

Author: 358816637@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-13 09:14:35
voted rejected, modified Plos one, first trial for more than one month, two reviewers, edited toOverhaul, more opinions, wrote more than 20 pages, after uploading with the editor more than 20 days directly accepted.I feel that after the revision in 2015, from the format to the review, the whole is strict, the reviewers are very professional, the opinions are in place, and the article is improved a lot. I hope that IF will rise steadily!
Show Review in Original Language
(17) Thank | 358816637@qq.com

Author: 435966483@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-12-15 21:40:23
has already cast two articles, one is almost two months, let's wait for the news; the other is also editor invited for a month..Anxiety
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 435966483@qq.com

Author: huwg09@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-28 13:52:25
The first submission on August 22nd, the technical review has not passed, the upload was uploaded again on the 25th, and the review was completed one week later. On October 9th, the first review opinion was obtained, and two reviewers,The opinions were positive and negative, but the editor seemed to prefer a reviewer who had a positive opinion. He gave a major repair, 45 days, and after the revision, he voted on November 15th. At present, there is 13 days with the editor. I don’t know what the rhythm is.~~ Anxious~~ Pray for good luck!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | huwg09@163.com

Author: xiaomu


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-18 23:06:47
PLOS ONE This magazine is very good. Although it is slow, it is still accepted. The editors and judges are very sincere and very rigorous. Thanks to PLOS ONE for achieving so many people, so those who are disgusting.The magazine is dead!In addition, I personally think that those who are black magazines must be refused, or see many people who voted for this magazine are very successful, personal opinions,!
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | xiaomu

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)

Start your review of [PLoS One]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.