Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

PLoS One

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[PLoS One]Hello, you are Visitor Number 429474 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePLoS One
Journal Title AbbreviationsPLOS ONE
ISSN1932-6203
Impact Factor (2017-2018)2.766
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.plosone.org/home.action
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/default.asp
Open AccessYes
PublisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, USA, CA, 94107
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume20328
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1932-6203%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PLoS One】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)
  Reviews on PLoS One: Write a review
Author: 马桂伶


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-05 19:12:57
Review faster, higher receiving rate
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 马桂伶

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-17 18:34:00
Help you heroes: Plos one seems to be very strict with the ethical review, I wrote in the method that the survey protocol was approved by...And ...After conducting the study. Informed consent was obtained from the subjects at the time of the first examination. The editor still returned the manuscript and asked to explain the following questions: Please amend your current ethics state
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-11 20:30:00
7月11Submission, August 28th major revision; October 12th, resubmit; October 15th, with editor; October 24th, under review; November 13th, minor revision; look forward to good luck!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: cell


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-11 14:26:19
this year's influenceThe factor has dropped, but it is still worthy of attention. After all, the number of published articles is very large.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | cell

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-29 22:55:00
was cheated by the foreigner so much money, but also very happy
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-29 18:18:00
rotten magazine, kicked out SCI early.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-23 21:41:00
IF3.7, fell out of 4
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-19 14:05:00
first trial for more than two months, overhaul, reviewer gave advice very professional and very detailed,Rehabilitated in 45 days and received two weeks later.Happy!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-15 08:36:00
The first trial was more than 50 days. After the overhaul, the second trial was more than 20 days. After the minor repair, it was received more than 20 days.Still relatively strict, four reviewers.The editors basically don’t give their opinions, and all the reviewers have the final say.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-08 14:51:00
charges, but the review is also very serious.The materials and methods are required to be written in great detail and the amount of data is large.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-08 11:49:00
Submission Requires overhaul
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-01 15:20:00
Is it SCI?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-28 16:29:00
PLOS ONE What papers are received?I see an article with a differential evolution algorithm and no biological problems, can I?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-27 16:42:00
The article on ecology, I heard that the submission will be easier, but a related professional article that has been recognized is rejected after reviewing the manuscript.In the 12th year of November, the manuscript was overhauled in January, and it was given 45 days. After the detailed revision of the year, I sent it abroad to find a co-author to help with the language. After returning to school in the Chinese New Year, I will cast the official revision, halfway because of a technical reason.Returned to repair once, then the editor directly reviewed the manuscript (not externally reviewed), and gave a minor repair in two weeks.It took only one day for the minor repair, but it was given for 45 days, so I waited a few days for the submission, and accepted it after more than a week...It is quite smooth...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-26 09:59:00
2012-12-13Submission, 28th day, 1-5 days with editor, 1-7under review, 2-2 repaired overhaul, gave 45 days, modified 3-14 submissions, 3-17with editor, until today is still in this state, I do not know what the situation, the first trial 3with editor 3 days after the under review, I look forward to a good result.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-09 16:38:00
cast an article a year ago, before the ethical review was very strict, the plants had to write clearly, and then the language problem, due to the Chinese New Year delay, voted back on February 23, has been EditorInvited, March 9, with editor, after ten minutes, became under review.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-06 09:06:00
Editor Invited It’s been almost a month, so I’m still not moving.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-04 21:38:00
Ask everyone a question, I voted for an item on the 1.28, and now I accepted it, but the boss asked me to modify the fund funding project. I haven’t found a place to change it for a long time.Where do you write the funding when you submitted the manuscript?Thank you very much for your help.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-21 09:03:00
has been submitted for two months, and has been under review, this is how it happened.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-20 22:11:00
This magazine many people say that irrigation is serious, butAfter my daughter-in-law was rejected, I saw that the editors were also very responsible. On the contrary, some people in China were not responsible for speaking. When people published articles, you said that people were flooded. I am afraid that there are problems with motivation. As far as I am concerned, I am here.The transposon article sent above is quite horizontal. After all, PLOS ONE is a comprehensive magazine. The reason why it will receive articles that are not accepted by some magazines of 3 o'clock is to take into account the differences in the research field of each person.Articles you are not interested in may be of interest to others.The quality of the article is also ok. I don't believe that you can't send the magazine at the level of 2 points. If you can help everyone graduate, don't say so much cool.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-15 09:41:00
12/02/2013 Manuscript Submitted14/02/2013 Editor Invited19/02/2013 With Editor
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-02 12:27:00
1 Submitted on the 29th, 4 days passed, even the manuscriptThe registration number has not been obtained yet, and the efficiency is too low now?Two years ago, I voted for an article. The editor was very serious and responsible. After repeated two times, I passed the technical review and got the registration number.The reviewers' comments were also in place, and the manuscripts were revised twice, and the quality of the manuscripts improved a lot.As a result, the manuscript was cited by peers after being published for 3 months, and the influence of the magazine is evident.However, it is not optimistic that the impact factor for 2012 will be reduced to around 3.8 due to the surge in publications.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-13 00:32:00
voted for a month or editor invited This is because the editor did not update the system information in time. In fact, it has been submitted for review. This is the editor who told me
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-28 23:20:00
The review process is very seriousThe reviewer's question is very good and professional. After the first revision, he answered the professional question. The reviewer asked to continue to modify the English expression. I carefully submitted it and submitted it. The reviewer and the editor thought it was not appropriate. I asked for a foreigner.The foreigner helped to polish English and submitted the third time for employment.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-17 14:14:00
Let me talk about my submission progress and feelings: I submitted a draft in August, I need to read the instructions for submitting the manuscript in advance, and I have a request for the picture. Of course, the picture has problems and it is ok. After receiving it.It is also possible to change it again.When submitting a manuscript, you need to fill in a lot of content, such as animal experiments, or moral proofs.If it fails, the review editor will ask for a refill.Each time you refill the content, it will be delayed by about 1 week.So be sure to fill in as much as possible.After the review, the manuscript will be sent to the editor and begin the three-month external review. At the end of November, the results of the external review are minor repairs. The three reviewers made some suggestions from different angles. The smoothness of the language is the most important.The problem needs to be treated carefully.The editor will notify you within 45 days
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)

Start your review of [PLoS One]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.