Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 178117 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ AM CHEM SOC
ISSN0002-7863
Impact Factor (2017-2018)14.357
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)7.20%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/jacsat
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1879
Annual Article Volume2633
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0002-7863%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 60%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY: Write a review
Author: bluesky


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-21 16:01:00
just cast, expect results
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | bluesky

Author: PEDOT_in_a_MOF


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-08 23:46:48
The first time (2018.2.6) was required to re-attend (2018.2.23) and was revised for half a year.After the re-investment (2018.3.1), it was overhauled (2018.4.9) and then hired (2018.4.23).Re-submitted to the recruitment for a total of about 2 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | PEDOT_in_a_MOF

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-08 23:22:45
was requested to re-attend for the first time, and it was revised for half a year.After the re-investment, he gave a major repair and was hired.Re-submitted to the recruitment for a total of one and a half months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 匿名

Author: gws


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-26 17:39:18
Submitted to Angew not long ago, tragedy!According to the reviewer's comments, the manuscript was submitted to JACS. The first round of review was 40 days. Three reviewers, one refused, one directly modified and gave a lot of 5%, a small repair.The deputy editor refused to comment but said that he would consider re-investment after the change.After carefully reviewing the manuscript for 3 months, he resubmitted the manuscript and edited Sanford to the reviewer who refused to submit the manuscript for the first time. After 20 days, the reviewer accepted the small repair and accepted it after spending 10 days of minor repairs.Accepted by the day.This article is the full text, I hope more people will help.
Show Review in Original Language
(21) Thank | gws

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-17 10:27:01
Review, after receiving the minor repairs received within 1 month, I feel that the review time and article type have little to do with, and the longest time is generally communication.After two submissions, after more than a month, the editors took the initiative to say "We are having some difficulties obtaining reviews from reviewers but we are actively attempting to do so." It seems that reviewers are the speed of the decision-making time.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 匿名

Author: math


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-08-15 16:27:49
are very strict.The resolution of each picture in the article is high and the size must be appropriate. It is rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | math

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-06 09:57:00
August 11th submission, one of the authors was delayed for a few days because of the name, and the email was sent to the review, Yang's editor.On September 19th, the review comments were received, one was received directly, and the other was overhauled, but the problem was not too big.Complemented a calculation, repaired on October 9th, and submitted for trial ~ less than a month after the interval, directly received on November 5.The article is an article, personally think that the new idea is still enough, the experience is to pay attention to the details, although the article does not require a certain set of templates, but it will really look good after the set, and the other pictures should be beautiful, answer the reviewer's opinion when "啰嗦".
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-05 10:10:00
The second revised draft was cast on the evening of October 1st, and was accepted on October 4th on the day of my birthday!Ecstasy!The best birthday present from small to big!
Show Review in Original Language
(115) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-01 01:11:00
Research direction: Asymmetric catalysis Article type: Communication Experience: Submitted to JACS soon after the deputy editor (GCFu); more than three weeks (slightly longer) return to review commentsBoth reviewers gave higher evaluations, all of which indicated that they received after minor repairs (suggestions in several language expressions, no experiments or data need to be added); the next day after the revision, the two days after the official reception(JustAccepted); The next day's proof, confirmed on the same day, ASAP on the day.From the initial submission to the final reception, it took exactly one month to complete.Very
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-24 10:09:00
jacs generally has two to four reviewers.I voted twice for the article and returned opinions for more than a month. One of the reviewers disagreed with the publication, but the editor was more optimistic about the paper (closer to the editor's research direction), giving the opportunity to modify, the paper did notDadong, responded to the comments of the reviewers, and soon the editor agreed to receive it.There was another vote of communication, which was quickly rejected by the editor.This paper has some problems in writing. Although the peers know the importance of the paper at first glance, it seems that the layman is not very attractive (later changed the title and the magazine for the change).Therefore, the best way to write a paper can be of great interest to readers.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-19 23:47:00
I look forward to my own article
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-10 05:18:00
twice as a co-author, reviewing speed and editing processing are very fast, very good magazine,Worth trying.However, as far as our condensed matter physics is concerned, the difficulty is still relatively large. Generally, it is not a new material, and there is no new physical property. Generally, we dare not try.A recent article as a communication author has been sent for nearly two weeks, and hopes to go smoothly.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-30 02:44:00
This year was a communi, and was selected as the cover.The cover is just a little drawn with powerpoint.I feel that I may still look at different research groups. Some foreign cattle research groups are still quite easy.But it really needs some innovation.My main area is liquid crystal, not chemistry.My boss thinks that for the LCD field, JACS and Angewante, advanced materials, and even soft matter are almost the third grade.The first is nature and science, and the second is some sub-studies of nature.It seems that the submission with chemistry is not very the same.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-27 13:22:00
Last year, a commu, Yang editor, made a round trip 3 times, the requirements are extremely high.This year, I got an article, Thomas's editor, and made two round trips. The editor gave each comment.Each time there are 3 reviewers, the speed is faster, one month at a time, and the requirements are comprehensive.Recently, I voted again for the JACS commun, which was submitted for trial in three days, and the efficiency was really high.The requirements are novel, beautiful and efficient.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-22 11:14:00
JACS has high requirements for article innovation and a wide range of reading stars.After two rounds of review, the article has been recognized for innovation, but one of the reviewers has been questioning the breadth of the article. After demonstrating its extensiveness, the editor received it directly and did not submit it for the third time.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-16 20:35:00
cast an article, look forward to!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-11 16:26:00
Received the reply in less than three weeks. The opinions of the two reviewers are highest top 5%
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-03 21:04:00
1 voted last year, reviewer20 days, overhaul, the two reviewers' novelty was given to moderate, 2 weeks after the revision, and overhaul. One of them said that it was completely Ok, and gave a few 5%. The other said that he liked the article very much, but saw it.The first reviewer's opinion, again the novelty gives the moderate. The second reply reviewer wrote 5 pages, all saying that our article is novel.Received after the last 2 weeks.I voted again this year, reviewing the draft for 24 days, tragedy.One of the reviewers' novelty is all 5%, and the other novelty is lowest.From a novelty point of view, I feel that my second manuscript is new, but there are reviewers who can't see it.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-27 22:47:00
cast a jacs, looking forward to it!After a month, I was rejected... I found a major breakthrough. After nearly two months of revision, I appealed again... After forty days, two minor repairs...half a monthAfter that, return to the revised manuscript... After a week, accept...
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-27 17:58:00
The small repair head was thrown out one night, and the next day was informed.Good luck
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-13 15:20:00
Mei Tao is a very influential magazine, editors and reviewers are very responsible, the article must have strong novelty, organization and integrity.The review speed is still relatively fast. There is news one month after the overhaul and three days after the minor repair.The speed of editing the manuscript is still very fast, a good journal, really very good
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-04 14:21:00
Article About 50 days in the first trial, three reviewers, I feel that the review cycle is a bit long.The minor repair notification will be received 5 days after the vote.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-07 19:19:00
JACS The article pays attention to the novelty of the topic, the wide versatility of the topic, the importance of the conclusion, the scientific quality of the scientific research work and the gracefulness of the written expression.I have a deep understanding of it, especially for language requirements.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-23 13:09:00
Article Casted for 34 days, no news, anxious!How long does the article review now (in 2012 or later)?Experienced bugs share their experiences!On December 27th, the deputy editor sent an e-mail requesting the submission of the consent, and now, no news, no hurry!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-04 16:14:00
Organic Chemistry No.1 Review cycle is very short.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.