Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

GREEN CHEMISTRY

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[GREEN CHEMISTRY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 153922 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleGREEN CHEMISTRY
Journal Title AbbreviationsGREEN CHEM
ISSN1463-9262
Impact Factor (2017-2018)8.586
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)9.40%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/gc
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/gc
Open AccessNo
PublisherROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started1999
Annual Article Volume613
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1463-9262%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 1.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 91%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【GREEN CHEMISTRY】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on GREEN CHEMISTRY: Write a review
Author: bwh113@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-03 10:05:14
Submission, returning to overhaul after 40 days of casting; three reviewers, one overhaul, one suggesting other magazines, one minor repair; carefully revised after half a month and returning, and then half a month laterReturning to the review comments, the first reviewer still has some questions, and has little relevance to the article. The editor has given the second revision; after one week of revision, the editor accepts it directly.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | bwh113@163.com

Author: bwh113@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-03 10:03:13
contribution, return to overhaul after 40 days of casting; three reviewers, one overhaul, one suggesting other magazines, one minor repair; after careful revision for half a monthAfter returning, I returned to the reviewer in half a month. The first reviewer still had some problems. The article was not related to the article. The editor gave the second revision. After one week of revision, the editor accepted it directly.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | bwh113@163.com

Author: dmuwxf@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-25 10:00:04
3月月4 submit, after about one week for review, on April 2, received comments overhaul, three reviewers have not a lot of questions, make up some experiments, May 5No. submit reversion, receiving on the 24th.The research direction is the application of platinum-cobalt bimetallic catalyst in selective hydrogenation. The experimental data is more, the GC is not enough, and the GC has not been tried.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | dmuwxf@163.com

Author: 沉


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-22 16:42:37
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 沉

Author: 沉


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-22 16:42:33
biomass conversion, editing the second data, only gave no innovation, no language##Id-sp##35558
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 沉

Author: ending


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-04 22:21:50
review time is veryLong, but I can really see the rigor of the editor and the seriousness of the reviewer. I saw that the overhauled opinions were tangled, and many people were speechless, but they did cut the points and had to take it. For more than a month, they experimented and madeA few dozen pages of responses.The summary is to wait patiently, once thought it was rejected, but in the end it was accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | ending

Author: miclebibi


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-06 21:15:08
February 6 submission, initial assessment 10 days, received the review results on March 16, three reviewers basically noComments, raised a few minor issues, another request to add a variety of negative control, edit to overhaul, March 22 repair, received on April 6th, the day onlineWhat is the chitin functionalization method?Continued again
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | miclebibi

Author: dingzheyuan@bjfu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-11 13:26:34
The research direction is that biomass conversion graphene material (GQD), which is considered to be innovative enough, did not dare to vote for JACS and Angew.This article really waited for a long time, three months before and after, 2017.10.26 submission, immediately submitted for review, the time of the external trial was surprisingly long, the middle caught up with Christmas, several times the state has changed, the state of Christmas is at that timeThe With editor and Peer review changed several times. After waiting for two and a half months, I finally gave a major repair at 2018.1.19. Three reviewers, one received, one directly refused, and one gave a major repair. In fact, they are all small.The problem was that the editor finally gave the overhaul. The brothers said that they were very lucky. Generally, this situation was rejected with great probability. It should be that the editor still liked the work, so he gave a major repair and rushed to answer the question for five days.2018.1.24 Revised, 2018.2.7 officially received without any modificationIn summary, if you invest in this journal for the first time, innovation is really important, the cycle may exceed expectations, it may be surprisingly long, and it is very important to prepare the map. Fortunately, the previous period has changed a lot, so the repair has not changed.Too big, I wish you good luck
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | dingzheyuan@bjfu.edu.cn

Author: 一头牛


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-07 20:49:21
contribution for 2 weeks, still with editor
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 一头牛

Author: 一头牛


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-07 20:49:14
contribution for 2 weeks, still with editor
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 一头牛

Author: vlp任逍遥


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-16 12:17:09
2018.01.02 Submission, selected by the Cambridge office, 01.03 initial assessment, 01. 12 with editor.No change so far.I stopped and refused. I changed my vote a few years ago........
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | vlp任逍遥

Author: simplezh@yeah.net


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-04 09:20:00
11.26Submitted, 28Initial assessment, 12.02 With Editor, no change, hope to be smooth!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | simplezh@yeah.net

Author: 1096484709@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-02 14:09:28
Two reviewers, one suggested to receive directly, and another reviewer had negative comments because the innovation was not enough.The editor directly rejected the draft and there was no arbitration.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 1096484709@qq.com

Author: x123


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-01 21:35:52
Although this submission has been submitted for trial for ten days, but the results are released three weeks after the trial, unexpected surprises, direct reception.I have submitted it many times before. This is the first time I received it. I am very happy and everyone is cheering.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | x123

Author: x123


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-08 17:07:28
My Initial assessment has been ten days, and I haven't used the editor yet. I remember it very quickly. Is the status upstairs updated now?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | x123

Author: wugongde@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-06 10:36:17
I voted for the article initial assessment status for 10 days, what is the situation!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | wugongde@163.com

Author: 糊涂虫


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-21 17:03:16
Recently, is RSC journals very slow??What activities do they have?My group's initial assessment status has been 10 days and has not changed.Now every day I brush the webpage, people are going crazy. I thought that the good journals are relatively fast. I took the attitude of trying to try the water and played it. The result is stuck here.Knowing that my work is relatively poor, the big cow editors can't look at it, they should be rejected soon, and the result has always been the first trial.God, save me, I am wrong, can you not play!Haha, no news is good news, it is estimated that it is doing very well, the editors can't put it down, no way, has been the first trial.Haha, Ah Q, I wish you all the best!
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 糊涂虫

Author: 123


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-02 23:25:56
The two reviewers sent the results for two weeks, one clearly rejected the manuscript, the editor gave the rejection, and now the requirements for innovation are very high
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 123

Author: jiyouan@126.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-29 11:29:28
I don't know if I will be lucky. This journal is quite demanding.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | jiyouan@126.com

Author: 123


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-29 01:12:10
submitted for review, hope good luckEveryone casts a journal for a long period of submission.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 123

Author: 小布丁


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-21 17:06:08
greenchemistry look like?How about a few pages?I want to know about it, prepare to write an article, ask for the big god to point
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 小布丁

Author: sunshine


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-19 15:20:47
has been submitted for more than a month, has been the status of underreview, waiting for
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | sunshine

Author: mm


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-12 10:12:09
3 Submitted on the 6th of the month, April 5th was given to Xiao Xiu, accepted on April 11th, the speed is very fast.This work has been done for more than a year. The preparation, mechanism and application are relatively comprehensive, and the process is green. I think green is the key.
Show Review in Original Language
(22) Thank | mm

Author: licunyao2008@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-05 18:10:59
first stage 20151228, and I have experienced the Christmas Spring Festival in the middle. The 20160217 review comments have finally come back, oneI agree to accept it directly, one proposal is revised and re-invested, and 12 questions are raised. The other said that there is a problem with innovation and it is not recommended.Editor Li Chaojun gave a heavy shot.In the second stage, after careful revision according to the reviewer's comments, 20160314 re-entered.20160401 returned to comments.The manuscript gave the reviewer who re-submitted the revised review proposal and strongly recommended it.A third reviewer who did not agree to accept it was also given, and the revision may be very careful. The third reviewer was moved, and the third person also accepted it.Editor Li Chaojun accepted it directly and recommended it as a cover article.I have seen a lot of people sharing experiences that are very reliable and have benefited a lot. Now I share my experience.As long as this magazine takes it seriously, acceptance is not too difficult.
Show Review in Original Language
(28) Thank | licunyao2008@163.com

Author: casc


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-04-28 16:59:29
Reviewers are more strict, one refuses, one agrees, and the result finds a third arbitration.Finally gave a heavy shot.After the overhaul, the project was re-invested for the reviewer, minor repair, and received directly after the minor repair. The whole process lasted for 4 months.The article is best to comply with the green concept.The journal now has a large amount of submissions, resulting in a low average employment rate and a rejection rate of between 75 and 80%.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | casc

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [GREEN CHEMISTRY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.