Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

CRYSTENGCOMM

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[CRYSTENGCOMM]Hello, you are Visitor Number 107421 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCRYSTENGCOMM
Journal Title AbbreviationsCRYSTENGCOMM
ISSN1466-8033
Impact Factor (2017-2018)3.304
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)9.10%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/ce
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.rsc.org/Publishing/ReSourCe/index.cfm
Open AccessNo
PublisherROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1999
Annual Article Volume792
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1466-8033%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.1 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 95%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【CRYSTENGCOMM】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on CRYSTENGCOMM: Write a review
Author: 1136946432@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-15 14:14:25
2018,3,01-cast-submitted2018, 4, 03-major revision (three reviewers have a total of 11 opinions, one rejects the manuscript, a major repair, a minor repair. The editor makes the overhaul.)2017,4,30- a revision Has been submitted2018,5,15-accept.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 1136946432@qq.com

Author: 123456


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-30 16:46:39
Not yet letter
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 123456

Author: jyxiayan@whu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-04 01:13:18
08-Jan-2018 Submitted (send it from the editor after about 5 days);20-Jan-2018 Major Revision (there are 5 comments from two reviewers, and there are about 3 additional trials! It is helpful to improve the quality of your thesis.)03-Feb-2018 A revision has been submitted (it is expected to return to the hands of 2 reviewers, one agrees to accept, one has some minor problems);24-Feb-2018 Minor Revision (may be delayed due to the Spring Festival, but it is still very fast!)01-Mar-2018 A revision Has been submitted03-Mar-2018 Accept
Show Review in Original Language
(17) Thank | jyxiayan@whu.edu.cn

Author: zzzaa


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-18 14:49:35
2017,11,02 one shot-submitted2017,11,27-Reject and Resubmitted2017,12,13-Resubmitted2018,1,22-Major revision2018,1,25-Revision submitted and accept.The total time is close to 3 months, and the individual feels that giving a re-review and re-investment is a great opportunity to make serious changes.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zzzaa

Author: jszb1324


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-18 16:27:17
November 6, 2017, submission, selection for the commication format, return to review comments on November 19, only one reviewer, rejectionOn November 19, 2017, a letter of intent was written to explain the professional level of the reviewer and the lack of reading the manuscript. The tone was strong.On November 21st, 2017, I received editorial comments and suggested that we re-invest in the article format and cast it out on the same day.On December 6, 2017, I received the review comments, (2 reviewers), positive opinions, and suggestions for publication. Each reviewer has about 6 questions, but no need to supplement the experiment.On December 8, 2017, reply and submitReceived on December 16, 2017Overall, CEC was very quick, accepted less than a month, the editor was very nice, and the week 6 was still replying to the mail.However, the level of reviewers was not flattering, and ACS's crystal growth
Show Review in Original Language
(21) Thank | jszb1324

Author: 浅念对白


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-02 20:37:21
2017.06.24 voted DALTON TRANSACTIONS, 2017.06.27 received an editorial rejection and strongly recommended to switch to CRYSTENGCOMM, because the article itself is to study nano-single crystals and crystal clusters, indeed as the editor said is more suitableCrystal Communications Magazine.2017.07.17 received the overhaul notice, the two reviewers respectively raised 6 questions, all of which were better to answer, added a decimal and returned to the editor after 07.20, and then were sent to one of the reviewers.2017.07.25 accept2017.08.06 proof2017.09.01 See publicationAfter switching to receiving less than a month, I still recommend that you vote for the magazine, which saves time and effort.Of course, do not rule out good luck published in a better magazine
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | 浅念对白

Author: dandan


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-14 09:14:29
2017-2-26Draft, 4-9 days to come back to review comments, refused to re-submit, three reviewers, a more positive work, minor repair; a major repair; editor sent to arbitrationArbitration overhaul; after careful modification, 5-12 re-investment, 6-13 days to receive.According to the editors and reviewers' comments, careful and careful revision will have good results.I wish you all the best, and the manuscripts that have been submitted have good results.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | dandan

Author: 天狼星


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-11 19:41:22
has been voted for 10 days, submitted on June 2nd, and became editor with June 3rd, then there is no more....I have been in the With editor state, I don’t know what the situation is. I voted for Communication ah
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 天狼星

Author: 1360870444@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-20 12:32:51
3.26Submission 5.03 Minor repair 5. 12th return 5.19 reception
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1360870444@qq.com

Author: 1150885049@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-15 19:00:19
2月25Submission, March 17 return, two minor repairs, March 29 modified return, April 13 accept online
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1150885049@qq.com

Author: jyrensdu@sina.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-02 09:20:32
2 submission on the 12th, March 31st to first-instance opinion, separated by 48 days, twoReviewers, all given minor repairs;After dragging on for so long, I thought that I was arbitrated. The final result is still good. It may be because of the reason for the New Year. Editor-selected Academician Zhang Hongjie~
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | jyrensdu@sina.com

Author: jiangaj1616


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-13 21:01:20
article. It is quite fast, nanomaterials.Direction, the first shot Crystengcomm, 2015.11.13 vote, 2015.12.07 overhaul, 2016.0-1.07 return revised draft, 2016.01.13 directly accepted.Zhang edits quite quickly!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | jiangaj1616

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-18 20:40:00
The time for editors to reviewers is relatively short, general communication for 1 week, full text and review for 2 weeks.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-18 11:38:00
first voted for the magazine, a Full Paper was submitted to the magazine from October 10th, and there is no first-instance news yet. After listening to the insects, the magazine is now reviewing the paper very slowly.I want to know how long the review period for the journal editor is for the reviewer.On November 27th, the results of the first trial, the two reviewers, a lot of criticisms on the review comments, made many suggestions on the sentences in the paper, another evaluation actively recommended the publication, the editor found the editorial board arbitration, the arbitration took the bugThe papers were incomplete, and actually said that under such inaccurate theory, there are still so many "ridiculous" data reported, and the rejection of the manuscript, the words feel very disrespectful to the author, it is doubtful that the judges morality.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-18 08:49:00
has a small job, cast Crystal Growth & Design rejected, changed to CrystEngComm, voted on the 15th, there is no news yet, I hope to give a force, at least send a review.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-03 10:10:00
This posting speed is really good!Three review comments in two weeks!Minor repair, upload the night to accept!Complete all the programs in less than a month!Zhang editor is very efficient!The quality of this article is really good, I feel a good article reviewer, the editor's attitude is really good!I hope everyone has to help!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-21 20:26:00
30-Aug contribution; 30-Sep revision comments returned, two reviewers, one minor repair one refused to engage, the editor gave an arbitration, arbitration minor repair, and finally edited to Xiao Xiu; 16-Oct Edited the manuscript, was scared to death, submitted a revised draft on the 17th; 21-Oct editorial notice accepted!From submission to recruitment for almost 2 months, I had some delays in the middle, and the editors and reviewers were very friendly and made some constructive comments...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-04 12:29:00
The first investment in Asian chemistry and pccp were not submitted for review, and the magazine did not report great hopes. The submission was submitted on July 29, minor repair on September 19, and received on October 3!!!!!It’s quite smooth, it’s been a little longer.....Pray for the National Award!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-30 20:34:00
27-Aug-2013Submission.13-Sep-2013 Review comments returned.Two reviewers, one overhaul, one minor repair.20-Sep-2013 revised draft is sent back.It is accepted 10 days later (today 30-Sep-2013).From submission to recruitment for 1 month and 3 days. High efficiency.Reviewers and editors are very friendly.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-23 21:18:00
Do not know the result of polymer crystallization. I just saw that this magazine has less polymer. But I heard that this magazine is faster, rush it.——————————————————————2013.10.15 reject or resubmit The reviewer is very expert, thank the editor for giving me the opportunity to modify the re-investment again.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-16 17:26:00
After the CC vote, the editor recommended to CEC, the current result is unknown
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-12 14:39:00
just cast, hope to be in.One of the 10 years, transferred from J. Mater. Chem., the evaluation is good.This is not very innovative, the data is not very attractive, but there is no effort to write.Crystal Growh Design refused to accept the trial, saying that it does not meet the scope of the journal.I hope this time can be done, Jesus, Jade Emperor, Guanyin Bodhisattva bless.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-09 19:59:00
CrystEngComm has also recently started to pick up manuscripts. It is estimated that the editors can guarantee the source of the manuscript after the number of articles has gone up.A job in the group has just been rejected, although we feel better than an article we just received in the group.A great many more papers are submitted to CrystEngComm than we can possibly publish and on that basis all manuscripts submitted to CrystEngComm are initially evaluated by
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-20 10:41:00
6.30-7.16 Submitted to J.Mater.Chem.CThe editor said that it is more specialized and prefers crystal growth. It has passed the editing channel of CrystEngComm. It can be directly transferred to 7.17-8.06 CrystEngComm for external audit. One has no opinion, one minor repair, and the editor receives the minor repair 8.10 Submit revised version 8.12 OfficialThe reception speed is very fast and the editor is also very responsible.The processing of the picture is very important. One or two highlights of the article are easy to attract the reviewer's attention.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-11 13:05:00
The first SCI, submitted for one and a half months of overhaul, submitted a revised draft one month later, and received it in a few days.The review speed is fast, mainly to find arbitration, so I waited for a month and a half.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [CRYSTENGCOMM]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.