Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 264843 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS
Journal Title AbbreviationsCHEM COMMUN
ISSN1359-7345
Impact Factor (2017-2018)6.290
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)5.20%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/cc
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/chemcomm
Open AccessNo
PublisherROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1996
Annual Article Volume2748
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1359-7345%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 1.7 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 82%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)
  Reviews on CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS: Write a review
Author: little


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-10 09:44:04
After one week of submission, the editor is still in the hands of the editor. After one week, he will submit the review, and 15 days will be reviewed. Two minor repairs,Uploaded after modification, received directly on the same day, this speed is no one, and the review speed is very fast!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | little

Author: 大头


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 13:22:28
I have been with editor until June 25th.No. in peer review may be too large for the manuscript, but the editor is still trying to submit the
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 大头

Author: apple


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 10:38:38
All with editor9 days, does anyone know that the status of this journal will show under review?Mys is not already submitted for review?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | apple

Author: GGD


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-15 23:07:03
2018.01.10Submission;2018.03.10 rejected the draft, a minor repair, the arbitration said that there were serious chemical problems rejected;2018.04.24 re-entry;2018.05.26 direct reception, invitation backcoverRejection after arbitration is still promising if it is revised according to the reviewer's opinion. The overall feeling is that CC still emphasizes innovation, especially in writing, it must be built around the innovation center. The probability of this is great.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | GGD

Author: scdx


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-14 23:30:45
Very good, the review comments are positive and negative, directly accepted after the overhaul, it is recommended that everyone pay attention to the format
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | scdx

Author: worm


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-27 21:49:33
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | worm

Author: sciencewss


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-27 21:17:21
is getting more and more water, no wonder the influence factor is getting lower and lower
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | sciencewss

Author: 搬砖人


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-06 15:30:37
The first post of graduate students is also the most difficult way to contribute.From March 2017, the manuscript was submitted to the end of April 2018, and finally it was cast out.I will probably share with you my contribution experience:On August 25, 2017, he voted for JMCA and began an anxious wait for more than two months; the result was a rejection.However, the reviewer's opinion was very pertinent. After the revision of the reviewer's opinion, he then voted for the ACS AMI and did not submit it for review.There is no way to make up the experiment and vote for CC.Submitted on February 3, 2018, the reason for the possibility of a holiday in the middle, returned to the overhaul on March 6, 2018. I really need to thank Dr Jamie Purcell AMRSC.The speed of CC is fast, it will be repaired on March 25, 2018, and the result will be accepted on April 4.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 搬砖人

Author: 某某某


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-05 08:24:37
2018.2.24 Submitted at 5 pm, and submitted to the trial at 11 pm that day;2018.3.14 With Editor, the review is finished, one reviewer highly recommended minor repairs, and another reviewer said that the article did not quote some people's results, Barabara's, simple change.The editor is looking for a third reviewer to arbitrate;2018.3.19 The arbitration reviewer strongly suggested that it be published after the minor repair, and the editor gave it to Xiao Xiu;2018.3.24 days of minor repairs (in the middle because the test has no time, minor repairs only took half a day);2018.3.26 at 12 am With Editor (25th is the weekend), 5 pm In Peer View, six points Accept2018.3.28 is invited to make a Back cover.Summarize the feeling of the first investment in Chem, Commun, the journal is very rigorous, very important to the innovation of the article, do not ignore the logic and fullness of the experiment because it is short communication.Editors and reviewers are very responsible and efficient. Unlike online, it is estimated that CC will reduce the amount of documents issued in 2018. After all, the current IF is not in line with its journal level. It is likely to break 7 next year. This isThe true level of CC.As long as you believe in the novelty of your article, feel free to vote, the submission period will not exceed 38 days!!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 某某某

Author: 977314966@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-29 20:57:02
03.083.12 Directly refused3.14 file a complaint, edit the complaint at night, and submit it directly for review.14 days have passed. No news yet, anxiously waiting....
Show Review in Original Language
(17) Thank | 977314966@qq.com

Author: Sigo


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-16 16:12:36
2017.1.19 Submission2017.2.21 minor repair2017.2.23 Back Accepted on the same day, online
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Sigo

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-03 09:49:31
Received comments 14 days after submission, a minor repair and a rejection.The comments were very deep and accurate, and the reviewers who refused to submit only gave a reason to point out the shortcomings of the article.However, this problem is really difficult to solve in the field.It took 6 days to integrate the comments and submit the revised draft, explain and discuss the problems that could not be solved, and re-emphasize the significance of the innovation of this article.Accepted two days later.The speed is very fast and the efficiency is very high. The reviewers are also very professional and knowledgeable.The key is efficiency!The research content is very innovative, can help and inspire peers, and needs to be published as soon as possible.Cc is doing very well in this regard, it is worth "home to urgent high quality communications from across the chemical sciences."
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 匿名

Author: ljb


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-03 09:43:52
Received comments 14 days after submission, a minor repair and a rejection.The comments were very deep and accurate, and the reviewers who refused to submit only gave a reason to point out the shortcomings of the article.However, this problem is really difficult to solve in the field.It took 6 days to integrate the comments and submit the revised draft, explain and discuss the problems that could not be solved, and re-emphasize the significance of the innovation of this article.Accepted two days later.It is fast and efficient.Reviewers are also very professional and knowledgeable.The key is high efficiency, the research content is very innovative, can help and inspire peers, and needs to be published as soon as possible.CC is doing very well in this regard, it is worth "Home to urgent high quality communications from across the chemical sciences."
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ljb

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-24 09:11:17
impact factorThe downtrend, the immediate impact factor has just been calculated. 6. The outlook is worrisome, and the insiders can blow the journal how to be good, but the school evaluation, the scholarship is good, the title is good, the introduction of talent is good, it is to see the impact factor,The influence factor of 6 or so, that is, the previous SR impact factor is 5, and there are still 4, at the school level, a CC equals 1.5 SR, and the journals below 10 are counted.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 匿名

Author: jay77


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-20 16:51:04
Very ribbed journal, it has no use, and the impact factor is not high.For those who have a relationship, the requirements are not high, and many articles are colluded with the editors.For those who have no relationship, the problem is that if my article is of good quality, it will not consider cc at all.So basically will not vote in the future.This time, the acie is based on it. I have a little regret to send the cc. I know that the nc
Show Review in Original Language
(18) Thank | jay77

Author: zhangjiesss923@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-29 08:41:34
The magazine is very efficient. It takes more than one month from submission to reception. The novelty of the article is high, at least in some aspects.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | zhangjiesss923@163.com

Author: 深海


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-05 06:15:01
A very fast magazine.The 10-day review draft was overhauled and returned two weeks later.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 深海

Author: 954912596@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-06 10:56:02
very fast, before investing OL almost threeAfter being rejected by arbitration for more than a week, I did not agree with the reviewer's opinion. I originally wanted to appeal, but I was forced to change CC directly because of time constraints. I really feel that CC reviewers are still quite responsible.Three reviewers (estimated to be small points in the middle), submitted on May 23, returned to overhaul on June 12, and rehabilitated on June 22, and received the result on the same day. This speed really shocked me, passed.Two or three days of Oline, then proofing, publishing, the whole process is very fast, and I feel that the editor is serious and responsible.As a result of the research team, the white mouse is very satisfied. During this period, I always come here to share the experience and give myself psychological comfort. Now the article accepts to provide some experience for more people to refer to.
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | 954912596@qq.com

Author: boyi


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-04 08:37:51
is very fast!5.29 Submission6.15 Overhaul6.26 Repair6.28 minor repair7.3 Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | boyi

Author: 58911112@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-05 20:15:00
2017.4.2 Submission2017.5.2 Overhaul2017.5.16 Revised2017.5.22 minor repair2017.6.3 Revised2017.6.5 AcceptThanks to ChemComm, thanks to letpub!
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 58911112@qq.com

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-20 17:36:41
cast an article a year ago, the editing efficiency is quite high, after the overhaul!!2015-12-20 Submission2016-1-4 Overhaul2016-1-14 Modified vote2016-1-28 Minor repairAccepted 2016-2-10Innovative requirements for work are high (previously cast an article, directly edited to request to switch to obc).The questions raised by the reviewers should be answered seriously. Even if they are overhauled, the possibility of acceptance is relatively high.The impact factor is long, it is estimated that this year will break 7.0,
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 匿名

Author: shitang@126.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-20 17:35:07
cast an article a year ago, the editing efficiency is quite high, after the overhaul!!2015-12-20 Submission2016-1-4 Overhaul2016-1-14 Modified vote2016-1-28 Minor repairAccepted 2016-2-10Innovative requirements for work are high (previously cast an article, directly edited to request to switch to obc).The questions raised by the reviewers should be answered seriously. Even if it is Shi Daxiu, the possibility of acceptance is relatively high.The impact factor is long, it is estimated that this year will break 7.0,
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | shitang@126.com

Author: shitang@126.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-20 17:34:59
voted an article a year ago, the editing efficiency is quite high, after the overhaul!!2015-12-20 Submission2016-1-4 Overhaul2016-1-14 Modified vote2016-1-28 Minor repairAccepted 2016-2-10Innovative requirements for work are high (previously cast an article, directly edited to request to switch to obc).The questions raised by the reviewers should be answered seriously. Even if it is Shi Daxiu, the possibility of acceptance is relatively high.The impact factor is long, it is estimated that this year will break 7.0,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | shitang@126.com

Author: 863587236@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-07-16 11:22:22
The second time CC was very miserable, I thought I would have a result soon!The result was dragged on for more than two months, during which we also tried the manuscript once. The two reviewers directly rejected the manuscript and were rejected, so the cc is still good for new ideas.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 863587236@qq.com

Author: 863587236@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-07-16 11:18:04
The first article of my own is published by CC. I feel that the CC article must be new!3.7 submission in 20143.28 received the feedback comments, two receipts and one rejection, the final overhaul4.10 back draft4.13 Accept!Time is fast, new ideas are good, and I am anxious to ask for an article!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 863587236@qq.com

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    Next    Last  (To Page
/5)

Start your review of [CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.