Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

CATENA

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[CATENA]Hello, you are Visitor Number 66622 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCATENA
Journal Title AbbreviationsCATENA
ISSN0341-8162
h-index99
CiteScore
CiteScoreQuartiles within subject categoriesCiteScore Rank
3.67Earth-Surface Processes (Q1)

Subject fieldRankPercentile
Category: Earth and Planetary Sciences
Subcategory: Earth-Surface Processes
10 / 132

Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)10.60%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/524609/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/catena/
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject Area环境科学
Country/Area of PublicationGERMANY
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume366
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0341-8162%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 4.8 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 18.2 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 25%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 7.4 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【CATENA】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on CATENA: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-30 16:16:00
The impact factor for Catena has been stable for the past few years; this is a good journal for soil science publications. To be honest, I ended up publishing in Catena after I was rejected from Geoderma. My manuscript was reviewed and accepted within two months – very impressed with this journal. My only other piece of advice is to format and submit your article as recommended by the journal (this can save a lot of time and emails).

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 安小默


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-22 16:13:31
My manuscript is quite fast, submitted on October 7th, 18th, and the results of the external review on November 1st will be revisited around December 10th, January 15th, 2019.Left and right second-instance opinions, repaired on January 24, received on the 29th
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 安小默

Author: 朱小抗113


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-23 17:37:38
2018.3.1 Submission2018.5.12 Overhaul, 3 reviewers have a total of ten comments, very positive, the editor gave a major overhaul2018.9.23 Rework, procrastination...2018.11.22 Intermediate repair, plus 2 new reviewers, and submitted 10 small comments2018.11.29 repair2018.12.10 minor repair, because of the addition of two new authors, let the confirmation letter2018.12.11 Rework2019.1.22 ReceivingAccording to the citations of last year, the final impact factor in 19 years should be around 3.5, the speed is really slow, and the emergency graduation select
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 朱小抗113

Author: 因为不变


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-22 14:20:22
2018-4-18 with editor2018-12-10 minor revision2019-1-21 acceptFor the first 8 months, please consider it if you want to select.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 因为不变

Author: 拾艺


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-15 11:31:23
From initial submission to first decision, 28 days.The speed was unexpected.Hope to have a good result
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 拾艺

Author: 路人斌


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-06 11:01:23
My ten months gave a major overhaul and is now being revised. Most of the articles in this journal have been submitted for more than one year, special pit
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 路人斌

Author: 一二三


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-04 12:12:53
This journal is really too slow. After submiting for 6 months, we are still inviting reviewers. Everyone must be in a hurry and don’t select. It’s really anxious, I want toRetracted.Moreover, it is more than half or more from the time of submitment. It is too slow.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 一二三

Author: 韩朔


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-28 14:12:16
The review was quick, and the results were returned in less than two months. The overhaul was given for three months. Because the experiment was to be completed, the draft was submitted in the past three months.After another month, the opinions were minor; after three days of return, I received it one week.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 韩朔

Author: osborn


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-27 12:35:31
Connected:Decison in process 7.16.2018Decison in process 7.17.2018Moderate revison 7.17.2018Authorized submitted 9.5.2018Editor assigned 9.6.2018Reviewers invited 9.20.2018I feel that the efficiency of editing is not too high.Submitted for repair to more than 20 days now, the reviewer has not received the manuscript
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | osborn

Author: skydj


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-23 11:12:43
2018.04.16 Submission2018.05.28 overhaulOverhaul two experts only gave 7 big opinions, gave them 3 months, and dragged them to the last week before returning to the draft...2018.08. 19 Rework2018.09.18 receivingThe speed is really fast, and the review period depends on the efficiency of the reviewer. I think this is fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(23) Thank | skydj

Author: 路人斌


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-18 08:23:20
Today it has become under review, for 8 months, stillNo news.无语
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 路人斌

Author: 路人斌


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-16 22:21:43
Review for 8 months, see todayWhen I got to the editor, I didn’t know what the result was, oh, too slow, and cautious.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 路人斌

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-18 09:38:28
I thought that the second district was a good journal. I didn’t expect the editor to be too perfunctory. I was super irresponsible. I gave the opinion in the first instance. The opinion was very good. I submitted it very seriously and the second trial experienced 4After a month, the final editor refused according to the reviewer's opinion. It was found that the reviewer's opinion was other manuscripts. The burner was not right, and the article was not correct, and then the email was appealed.The editorial department did not respond!The rigor and seriousness of the former superstitious foreigners, I did not expect it to be very ridiculous!
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | Anonymous

Author: osborn


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-09 10:38:36
initial submission 4.11.2018Editor assigned 4.16.2018Under review 5.8.2018Under review 5.23.2018Under review 6.1.2018Under editor evaluation 7.6.2018Currently in the same result
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | osborn

Author: zm


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-31 05:21:53
I don’t know how slow it is, submitted in 2016, now one and a half years have passed, still in the review, really anxious!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | zm

Author: 不小水的鱼


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-16 12:45:14
review comments differ greatly, three reviewers, gave aOverhaul, and after minor repairs, the second district regular journal, published still has a certain degree of difficulty
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 不小水的鱼

Author: yoyoyoyoyoyo


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-21 10:37:18
2 months under review, review for more than three months.Experts have raised many questions.The low impact factor of
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | yoyoyoyoyoyo

Author: zcl


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-23 22:09:27
I used to listen to others and said it was very slow, but this submission was quickly reviewed.Two reviewers, only one proposed six amendments.After receiving the repair, it was received very quickly. The language requirement was really high. At the time, there was no touch up at the time of submission, and it was directly returned to request to modify the language.This year's impact factor has dropped a bit, but it is acceptable.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | zcl

Author: sxh


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-07 10:55:47
Very good journal, the editor is very friendly!2014-2015 If=2.820. The language is required to be excellent, and the article should have a bright spot.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | sxh

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-11 17:19:16
from submission to receiving comments for a total of 4 monthsThe evaluations of the two reviewers were all good. After the revision, the original reviewers were reviewed for one month and received directly.The requirements for English are very high. Before submiting, it is best to let foreigners look at it. The innovation is strong. The reviewers feel very responsible. The editors deal with the papers quickly. The article is published online after receiving it, but the volume number will take a long time to give.I hope to improve.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-18 11:24:00
This journal is still good, although it was overhauled, but it was finally published, and it is also the best journal I published.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-05 15:03:00
Now how there is no introduction to the impact factor?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 14:26:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-17 16:47:00
2.16Submission, No. 4.28 for review, No.6.9 Major revision, No. 7.4 for revision, and No. 7.10 for acceptance.In this way, the main time is spent on inviting editors and reviewers, and the review speed and editing efficiency are quite high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-30 08:32:00
This journal pays more attention to the innovation of the paper
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [CATENA]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.