Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

CATENA

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[CATENA]Hello, you are Visitor Number 66427 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCATENA
Journal Title AbbreviationsCATENA
ISSN0341-8162
h-index99
CiteScore
CiteScoreQuartiles within subject categoriesCiteScore Rank
3.67Earth-Surface Processes (Q1)

Subject fieldRankPercentile
Category: Earth and Planetary Sciences
Subcategory: Earth-Surface Processes
10 / 132

Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)10.60%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/524609/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/catena/
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject Area环境科学
Country/Area of PublicationGERMANY
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume366
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0341-8162%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 4.8 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 18.2 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 25%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 7.4 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【CATENA】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on CATENA: Write a review
Author: osborn


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-09 10:38:36
initial submission 4.11.2018Editor assigned 4.16.2018Under review 5.8.2018Under review 5.23.2018Under review 6.1.2018Under editor evaluation 7.6.2018Currently in the same result
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | osborn

Author: zm


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-31 05:21:53
I don’t know how slow it is, submitted in 2016, now one and a half years have passed, still in the review, really anxious!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | zm

Author: 不小水的鱼


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-16 12:45:14
review comments differ greatly, three reviewers, gave aOverhaul, and after minor repairs, the second district regular magazine, published still has a certain degree of difficulty
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 不小水的鱼

Author: yoyoyoyoyoyo


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-21 10:37:18
2 months under review, review for more than three months.Experts have raised many questions.The low impact factor of
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | yoyoyoyoyoyo

Author: zcl


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-23 22:09:27
I used to listen to others and said it was very slow, but this submission was quickly reviewed.Two reviewers, only one proposed six amendments.After receiving the repair, it was received very quickly. The language requirement was really high. At the time, there was no touch up at the time of submission, and it was directly returned to request to modify the language.This year's impact factor has dropped a bit, but it is acceptable.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | zcl

Author: sxh


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-07 10:55:47
Very good journal, the editor is very friendly!2014-2015 If=2.820. The language is required to be excellent, and the article should have a bright spot.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | sxh

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-11 17:19:16
from submission to receiving comments for a total of 4 monthsThe evaluations of the two reviewers were all good. After the revision, the original reviewers were reviewed for one month and received directly.The requirements for English are very high. Before investing, it is best to let foreigners look at it. The innovation is strong. The reviewers feel very responsible. The editors deal with the papers quickly. The article is published online after receiving it, but the volume number will take a long time to give.I hope to improve.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-30 16:16:00
Multi-year impact factor 1.8, IF is very stable, premonition IF will pass 2. Very good journal in soil science.After investing in an article, he first voted for Geoderma. Because the discussion was not deeply rejected, he was transferred to catena, and he was reviewed in two months. After the minor repair, he accepted the publication!When the revision is submitted again, the table and the graph should be uploaded separately, not included in the MS, and the tables caption and figures caption should be uploaded separately, but only the figures caption in the system, there is no table caption upload menu, so only the figure caption is selected.Now still reviewing, no
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-18 11:24:00
This journal is still good, although it was overhauled, but it was finally published, and it is also the best journal I published.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-05 15:03:00
Now how there is no introduction to the impact factor?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 14:26:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-17 16:47:00
2.16Submission, No. 4.28 for review, No.6.9 Major revision, No. 7.4 for revision, and No. 7.10 for acceptance.In this way, the main time is spent on inviting editors and reviewers, and the review speed and editing efficiency are quite high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-30 08:32:00
This journal pays more attention to the innovation of the paper
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-13 12:27:00
midstream journal, certainly not comparable to SBB, SSSAJ, but the quality is good, not much irrigation....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-13 11:27:00
An article on grassland vegetation cover and soil wind erosion and sand accumulation.It was the last revision of the submission, and it took three months to review the manuscript.I feel that the review is still very rigorous.The change was very careful, and it may be that the foreigner reviewers are more serious.The revised draft has been uploaded and is being edited.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-26 20:42:00
The journal mainly publishes articles on soil, geography and environment. The impact factors are still high in the journals of soil science, but the division is in the ecological discipline, so it is generally in four.District or three districts.The review cycle may vary greatly depending on the content of the article. My article took 4 months from submission to acceptance, and the publication was very fast. It was included in SCI for almost 7 months.However, some articles have not been reviewed in a year, so the speed of reviewing journals may depend mainly on reviewers.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 土壤侵蚀
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-12-15 21:21:00
The top journal of soil related research, the hit rate is low, and the requirement for innovative and strong review period is long. Generally speaking, the English expression is very high for 3 months to 5 months.Be sure to prepare adequately before.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [CATENA]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.