Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

BMC CANCER

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[BMC CANCER]Hello, you are Visitor Number 35451 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleBMC CANCER
Journal Title AbbreviationsBMC CANCER
ISSN1471-2407
Impact Factor (2017-2018)3.288
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)1.80%
Official Websitehttp://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/bcan/default.aspx
Open AccessYes
PublisherBIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 236 GRAYS INN RD, FLOOR 6, LONDON, ENGLAND, WC1X 8HL
Subject AreaMedicine
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started2001
Annual Article Volume889
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1471-2407%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: Average 6.8 Month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 38.12%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【BMC CANCER】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on BMC CANCER: Write a review
Author: blue


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-01-20 10:33:32
BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology of cancer, prevention, diagnosis and treatment..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | blue

Author: bang


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-01 13:24:33
lasted nearly one year, the magazine was submitted slowly, and finally see the magazine fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | bang

Author: wang024


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-28 15:36:56
has been in the process of posting for about 4 months, and has experienced 3 revisions in the middle.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | wang024

Author: zk907030@163.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-08 21:17:40
6 at the beginning of the month, in the originalFeel free to vote, try to see the idea, the format did not pay attention, and later in July minor repair, repaired, after the end of August minor repair, September 8 notification received, the overall feeling is good, not much demand, the magazine responded to the mail is veryTimely, the layout fee is too expensive, can not be reduced
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | zk907030@163.com

Author: billhappy001@163.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-02 17:32:08
From submission to employment for 13 months, the first revision is 8 months, the overall speed is extremely slow!Seriously on the format requirements!The review comments are pertinent!The editor's attitude is still friendly, it is too slow!Staying at 3.0 for the past 5 years is still a good choice.If you are holding a graduation or award, be careful!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | billhappy001@163.com

Author: hxl


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-11 17:01:13
review speed is super slow, the editorial attitude is not serious and positive.Submitted in early June last year, received reviewers report after New Year's Day this year. Re-invested within 10 days after the revision. After more than 2 weeks, the editor's slow response said to add a sentence to the material and method.Plus the same day.Yesterday I finally received an email saying that I received it.I feel that editing is not very responsible.During the period, I rushed for a long time and there was no good reply.If you want to send an article quickly, don't recommend this journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hxl

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [BMC CANCER]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.