Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION]Hello, you are Visitor Number 57846 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleWATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
Journal Title AbbreviationsWATER AIR SOIL POLL
ISSN0049-6979
h-indexN.A.
CiteScore
CiteScoreQuartiles within subject categoriesCiteScore Rank
1.90Environmental Engineering (Q2)

Pollution (Q2)

Water Science and Technology (Q2)

Ecological Modeling (Q3)

Environmental Chemistry (Q3)

Subject fieldRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Water Science and Technology
52 / 191
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering
40 / 106
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
42 / 101
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Ecological Modelling
13 / 29
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
52 / 97

Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)8.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.springer.com/environment/journal/11270
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/wate/
Open AccessNo
PublisherSPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS, 3311 GZ
Subject Area环境科学
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1971
Annual Article Volume464
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0049-6979%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-16 10:54:00
This journal is not good. The processing efficiency is so low: a paper often stays in the “editor assigned” status for one month, and then gets rejected for the following reason: “Information is of local interest only. No new knowledge, science or discovery is presented.” Funny thing is that I recently submitted three articles to the journal, all of which were directly rejected with the above reason, but these manuscripts were later published in journals that are ranked much higher than this one. I don't know if this is because the journal doesn't want manuscripts from Chinese authors.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 天空


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-27 10:36:45
The speed is very slow. After submitting the manuscript for one week, the result is reviewed. The result is two and a half months before the review is finished. As a reviewer, the reviewer said that my content is not innovative enough.Finally, the editor gave the evidence, and the reviewer was too pitted. The article was in his hands for more than two months. The final review comments were a few words, and then the evidence was given. It was delayed for so long and missed a lot.In fact, it is quite wronged.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 天空

Author: wjy603@126.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-14 22:53:10
This journal is very boring. It is always a sentence "Not acceptable. No new knowledge, science or discovery is presented." It is estimated that it has not been edited.At the eye of the law, the probability of hiring should be quite large if there is a chance to submit it for review.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | wjy603@126.com

Author: tianjiao860528@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-07 14:22:21
9月10The reviewer was slower, and he was asked once in November. He received a notice of modification on December 14 and was directly acceptd on January 31 after a modification.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tianjiao860528@163.com

Author: 1227156535@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-18 15:47:00
In mid-month, the operator was assigned to the under review. On December 20th, the external review opinion was returned. The modification was changed for ten days. After returning the revised opinion, the editor was assigned for ten days. Accepted in mid-January, checkNot exactly four months...
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 1227156535@qq.com

Author: Shena


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-28 10:08:29
Really unhappy!!!Submitted on December 13th, maintained 10 days of editor assgined,An email was sent in the middle, but no one responded.On December 23, it became editor invited.The status has not changed since then..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Shena

Author: m13258392158@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-12 12:40:01
is not imaginary, the review efficiency is relatively low, 11.26 submission to 12.12 has been in the editor assigned state
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | m13258392158@163.com

Author: zhou66ha2@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-09 15:42:24
editor is very responsible, the system status update is particularly fast!One month after the submission, the editorial department sent an e-mail to recommend more reviewers, and responded on the same day. After one and a half months, the initial review comments came back, minor repairs, and received 15 days after the repair.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | zhou66ha2@163.com

Author: CUGBMAN


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-12 09:18:04
Recommended and acceptd!This is a very responsible journal, the editor respects the author's opinion, and the status change notice is timely.After the first draft was submitted for one and a half months, the overhaul was notified. After the revision, the manuscript was resubmitted and waited for ten days to notify Accept.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | CUGBMAN

Author: hh


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-01 13:02:19
Edit very serious SCI journals unfortunately the impact factor is not high now the old SCI factor is not even those SCIE high
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | hh

Author: ff


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-01-15 20:58:53
They are all free and true conscience journals
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | ff

Author: ff


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-01-15 20:56:14
The requirements for innovation are not low, the requirements are quite high, and the final revision is made after many revisions. 2 reviewers review the manuscript
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ff

Author: maoge


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-12 09:35:41
The review speed is very fast, it feels easier!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | maoge

Author: liyun19850816@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-05-24 17:42:24
Submitted for two months, an expert opinion,Minor repair, has been modified to return, waiting for the results.....
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | liyun19850816@163.com

Author: ~~~


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-12 04:33:08
is a photocatalytic degradation dye of graphene oxide composite nano-titanium dioxide. The innovation is generally, mainly to make things clear. After half a month, I did not find a reviewer, and asked to continue to recommendThe reviewer casually filled in a few good relationships, and the results were really found. Then he had to repair it in half a month. After the minor repair, he received it directly in the week, and then he saw it in the second half of the month. In general, the editor was very good.Luck is also good
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | ~~~

Author: SH0326


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-04 11:59:00
is rejected less than two months.I found a reviewer and reviewed it for 1 month.What I did was the direction of environmental chemistry. The reviewer who was looking for it was actually microbial toxicology.The result is a lot of questions such as how the chemical unit should be written and some of the spelling mistakes. ```The actual chemical unit is written. I have been writing this way and I have never been told that there is a problem.In the end, I refused to use `` because I have the habit of putting a series of pictures in a total large picture` so I will appear to be less```Ok``funny
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | SH0326

Author: zick079@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-09-19 13:28:10
As the legendary review is faster, but only one reviewer’s review request does not feel so easy to be legendary anyway, I was rejected, and the requirements for innovation are not so loose, I am doingSomeone did it a few decades ago...But compared to the Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, it's relatively easy. I didn't even have to submit the review.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | zick079@163.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-30 18:05:00
Put out and enter the review state one month later, and give it a major repair after one and a half months.It is about three and a half months of the words that can be published before and after.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-31 08:29:00
I regret not seeing it...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-30 12:37:00
The review time is very long, and the two revisions have been made in the middle. The review comments are constructive and finally accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-03 10:13:00
No new knowledge, science or discovery is presented. Information is of local interest only.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-11 10:58:00
Not acceptable. No new knowledge, science or discovery is presented.Information is of local interest only. It seems to be an excuse for rejecting the manuscript.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-22 14:58:00
Information is of local interest only. No new knowledge, science or discovery is presented tragedy.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-16 13:18:00
Information is of local interest only. No new knowledge, science or discovery is presented. Garbage publication
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-18 13:31:00
I also encountered the same situation, no longer in the futureCast it
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.