Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 98942 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleSEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsSEP PURIF TECHNOL
ISSN1383-5866
Impact Indicator (2017-2018)H-index: 132

CiteScore: 4.25
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)11.10%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600251/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/seppur/
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1997
Annual Article Volume767
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1383-5866%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 4.1 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 6.8 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 76%
Data from Elsevier: 30%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: 五十五


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-18 10:54:35
This journal is too slow, it is better to choose faster, more than a few times, and start thinking that the journals in the second district will not be too slow. As a result, the journal is slow to explode.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 五十五

Author: 2332


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-12 15:56:29
2018.01.29 Casting2018.02.06 Submitted for review2018.04.01 Return to review comments Overhaul (to two months to modify)2018.04.30 Return to the revised draft2018.05.06 receiving2018.05.07 Internet
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 2332

Author: jimiro


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-11 16:05:57
This speed is the slowest in the journals that have been voted, wasting time
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | jimiro

Author: chenkun


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-10 14:38:35
This magazine is really effective in its efficiency. In mid-January, the review was submitted in early March. Because of the large papers, I was dragged to the March 20th to give them feedback.Then one week later, the notice was accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | chenkun

Author: lvhang@hust.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-10 20:07:49
It feels very slow, with editor 18 days, then Reviewer Invited 28 days...I don't know what to do next.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | lvhang@hust.edu.cn

Author: Arno


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-24 10:19:31
contribution is quite smooth, a reviewer minor repair, a major repair, 2 months of initial review, 3 months to see the magazine, the magazine's impact factor has grown steadily.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | Arno

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-01-10 18:47:09
published an article on Separation and Purification Technology. The time node information for submission is as follows:2016.05.07 Delivery2016.05.29 Submitted for review2016.12.11 Return to review comments Overhaul (to be revised for two months)2016.12.29 Return to revised version (modification time is 2 weeks)2017.01.01 Receive2017.01.03 Internet
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 匿名

Author: 815048960@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-06 08:45:03
This speed, I served, the slowest of the journals I voted, I feel that it is time to paySuch journals will be less and less popular
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 815048960@qq.com

Author: jack


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-27 15:05:13
just submitted an article, the editor is R. Aires-Barros, the direction is mineral separation.Who voted, what about this editor?Thank you!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | jack

Author: 123123


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-12 11:04:49
surprisingly slow, witheditor 21 days, still not responding, really out of the 歪
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 123123

Author: 402963101@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-17 17:58:41
for the first time, share the experience, I am doing the catalysis, the editor is Chen Guohua,Started voting on April 5On April 28, I received a reply from the overhaul. I am very happy that the editors and reviewers are too fast. One of the reviewers said that they will receive it directly after the revision.May 13 revised draft castThe next second trial is very slow, slow and slow.August 16 finally waited for the reception~August 17 gave the doi number to handle copyright.Overall it feels a bit slow, but it's okay, and the magazine's impact factor has been rising in the past three years.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 402963101@qq.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-24 21:21:00
From submission to giving advice, it took 11 months, several times in the middle, but it was given to Xiao Xiu; after minor repair, it was a long wait, with editor 1Month, urging 2 times... and then for 3 weeks, finally hired.2012.06-2013.08, 14 months, directly approaching the lab paper submission cycle!Recommendation: Environmental articles are still under-reported, and the review cycle is very long, which may be the reason for not being able to find reviewers.If there is no response for a long time, it is recommended to send a reminder letter to the editor. It may be that the editor has no time.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-23 11:46:00
with editor 1 month, no movement, reminder once, still no movement, this editor is really speechless, it seems that environmental articles are still not to vote for this journal, super slow, editor is not responsible.Wait a second half, if you can't do it, Grandma's, haven't seen such a junk journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-25 17:42:00
How to use the editor has not been submitted for 1 month?Is this something that people do?It is accurate to say that it is still not submitted for review in 50 days. How to withdraw the draft?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-23 08:12:00
13Submission of February 7th, 3 months, still under review.July 20, still under review.....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-01 09:14:00
Received at Editorial Office:31 Aug 2011Article revised:4 Mar 2013Article accepted for publication:8 Mar 2013Received at Elsevier:11 Mar 2013The manuscript is slower, and the review comments are returned in 8 months. Since this article was overhauled twice, the overall 18 months
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-12 11:05:00
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-23 15:38:00
graphic abstract Is it necessary, I don’t know how to do it,Please prawn pointing
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-19 14:21:00
just voted out at noon, selected Bart Van der Bruggen for editing, the future is unknown!I hope it will be faster.Helpless, our line seems to have no foreign journals to vote for.Ps I am a rare earth metal preparation and purification, prawn know what journals can be invested?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-12 22:53:00
Received at Editorial Office:11 Apr 2012Article revised:1 Oct 2012Article accepted for publication:6 Oct 2012Received at Elsevier:9 Oct 2012
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-11 10:26:00
voted for five monthsJust returning comments to overhaul, please give me some advice on how to modify the experience.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-12 18:40:00
Slow, technical check in process It has been three weeks, how to format review for so long!What is efficient?!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-09 09:25:00
Will the drawings and tables in the manuscript submitted by this journal be placed at the end of the article or in the corresponding position?I read the author's instructions, but I am still not sure about the format of the journal. Please expert guidance~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-11 22:20:00
2.17 submitted to journal2.20 editor invieted2.21 technical check in progress2.21 with editor2.21 under review4.4 required reviews completed4.6 revise4.26 revision submitted to journal4.30 underReview
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-03 10:37:00
I have been eight months old, and I am still under review. I have sent four reminder letters before, and I have not returned to me once. Now I am going to change to the magazine. I would like to ask you all the friends.Still need to write a retraction letter to the editor?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.